More Like this

1. More accurate $$ \sigma \left(\mathcal{GG}\to h\right),\Gamma \left(h\to \mathcal{GG},\mathcal{AA},\overline{\Psi}\Psi \right) $$ and Higgs width results via the geoSMEFT

   https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2024)170  

   Martin, Adam ; Trott, Michael ( January 2024 , Journal of High Energy Physics)

   We develop Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT) predictions ofσ($$ \mathcal{GG} $$$\mathrm{GG}$→h), Γ(h→$$ \mathcal{GG} $$$\mathrm{GG}$), Γ(h→$$ \mathcal{AA} $$$\mathrm{AA}$) to incorporate full two loop Standard Model results at the amplitude level, in conjunction with dimension eight SMEFT corrections. We simultaneously report consistent Γ(h→$$ \overline{\Psi}\Psi $$$\overline{\Psi }\Psi$) results including leading QCD corrections and dimension eight SMEFT corrections. This extends the predictions of the former processes Γ, σto a full set of corrections at$$ \mathcal{O}\left({\overline{v}}_T^2/{\varLambda}^2{\left(16{\pi}^2\right)}^2\right) $$$O\left({\overline{v}}_T^2/{\Lambda }^2{\left(16{\pi }^2\right)}^2\right)$and$$ \mathcal{O}\left({\overline{v}}_T^4/{\Lambda}^4\right) $$$O\left({\overline{v}}_T^4/{\Lambda }^4\right)$, where$$ {\overline{v}}_T $$${\overline{v}}_T$is the electroweak scale vacuum expectation value and Λ is the cut off scale of the SMEFT. Throughout, cross consistency between the operator and loop expansions is maintained by the use of the geometric SMEFT formalism. For Γ(h→$$ \overline{\Psi}\Psi $$$\overline{\Psi }\Psi$), we include results at$$ \mathcal{O}\left({\overline{v}}_T^2/{\Lambda}^2\left(16{\pi}^2\right)\right) $$$O\left({\overline{v}}_T^2/{\Lambda }^2\left(16{\pi }^2\right)\right)$in the limit where subleadingm_Ψ→ 0 corrections are neglected. We clarify how gauge invariant SMEFT renormalization counterterms combine with the Standard Model counter terms in higher order SMEFT calculations when the Background Field Method is used. We also update the prediction of the total Higgs width in the SMEFT to consistently include some of these higher order perturbative effects.

    

   more » « less
2. Search for Higgs boson decays to a Z boson and a photon in proton-proton collisions at $$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 13 TeV

   https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2023)233  

   Tumasyan, A. ; Adam, W. ; Andrejkovic, J. W. ; Bergauer, T. ; Chatterjee, S. ; Damanakis, K. ; Dragicevic, M. ; Escalante Del Valle, A. ; Frühwirth, R. ; Jeitler, M. ; et al ( May 2023 , Journal of High Energy Physics)

   Results are presented from a search for the Higgs boson decay H→Zγ, where Z→ ℓ⁺ℓ⁻withℓ= e or μ. The search is performed using a sample of proton-proton (pp) collision data at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, recorded by the CMS experiment at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb⁻¹. Events are assigned to mutually exclusive categories, which exploit differences in both event topology and kinematics of distinct Higgs production mechanisms to enhance signal sensitivity. The signal strengthμ, defined as the product of the cross section and the branching fraction$$ \left[\sigma \left(\textrm{pp}\to \textrm{H}\right)\mathcal{B}\left(\textrm{H}\to \textrm{Z}\upgamma \right)\right] $$$\left(\sigma \left(\mathrm{pp}\to H\right)B\left(H\to \mathrm{Z\gamma }\right)\right)$relative to the standard model prediction, is extracted from a simultaneous fit to theℓ⁺ℓ⁻γ invariant mass distributions in all categories and is measured to beμ= 2.4 ± 0.9 for a Higgs boson mass of 125.38 GeV. The statistical significance of the observed excess of events is 2.7 standard deviations. This measurement corresponds to$$ \left[\sigma \left(\textrm{pp}\to \textrm{H}\right)\mathcal{B}\left(\textrm{H}\to \textrm{Z}\upgamma \right)\right]=0.21\pm 0.08 $$$\left(\sigma \left(\mathrm{pp}\to H\right)B\left(H\to \mathrm{Z\gamma }\right)\right)=0.21\pm 0.08$pb. The observed (expected) upper limit at 95% confidence level onμis 4.1 (1.8), where the expected limit is calculated under the background-only hypothesis. The ratio of branching fractions$$ \mathcal{B}\left(\textrm{H}\to \textrm{Z}\upgamma \right)/\mathcal{B}\left(\textrm{H}\to \upgamma \upgamma \right) $$$B\left(H\to \mathrm{Z\gamma }\right)/B\left(H\to \mathrm{\gamma \gamma }\right)$is measured to be$$ {1.5}_{-0.6}^{+0.7} $$${1.5}_{-0.6}^{+0.7}$, which agrees with the standard model prediction of 0.69 ± 0.04 at the 1.5 standard deviation level.

    

   more » « less
3. Hint of a new scalar interaction in LHCb data?

   https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12890-8  

   Datta, Alakabha ; Marfatia, Danny ; Mukherjee, Lopamudra ( June 2024 , The European Physical Journal C)

   We explain recent LHCb measurements of the lepton universality ratios,$$R_{D^{(*)}}^{\tau /\ell }\equiv \frac{\mathcal {B}(\bar{B} \rightarrow D^{(*)+} \tau ^- \bar{\nu }_\tau )}{\mathcal {B}(\bar{B} \rightarrow D^{(*)+}\ell ^- \bar{\nu }_\ell )}$$$R_{D^{(\ast )}}^{\tau /\ell }\equiv \frac{B(\overline{B}\to D^{(\ast )+}{\tau }^{-}{\overline{\nu }}_{\tau })}{B(\overline{B}\to D^{(\ast )+}{\ell }^{-}{\overline{\nu }}_{\ell })}$and$${R(\Lambda _c^+)}^{\tau /\ell } \equiv \frac{\mathcal {B}(\Lambda _b \rightarrow \Lambda _c^+ \tau ^- \bar{\nu }_{\tau })}{\mathcal {B}(\Lambda _b \rightarrow \Lambda _c^+ \ell ^- \bar{\nu }_{\ell })}$$${R\left({\Lambda }_c^{+}\right)}^{\tau /\ell }\equiv \frac{B({\Lambda }_b\to {\Lambda }_c^{+}{\tau }^{-}{\overline{\nu }}_{\tau })}{B({\Lambda }_b\to {\Lambda }_c^{+}{\ell }^{-}{\overline{\nu }}_{\ell })}$with$$\ell =\mu $$$\ell =\mu$, via new physics that affects$$R_D^{\tau /\ell }$$$R_D^{\tau /\ell }$and$$R(\Lambda _c^+)^{\tau /\ell }$$$R{\left({\Lambda }_c^{+}\right)}^{\tau /\ell }$but not$$R_{D^*}^{\tau /\ell }$$$R_{D^{\ast }}^{\tau /\ell }$. The scalar operator in the effective theory for new physics is indicated. We find that the forward-backward asymmetry and$$\tau $$$\tau$polarization in$$\bar{B} \rightarrow D^+ \tau ^{-} \bar{\nu }_{\tau }$$$\overline{B}\to D^{+}{\tau }^{-}{\overline{\nu }}_{\tau }$and$$\Lambda _b \rightarrow \Lambda _c^+ \tau ^- \bar{\nu }_{\tau }$$${\Lambda }_b\to {\Lambda }_c^{+}{\tau }^{-}{\overline{\nu }}_{\tau }$decays are significantly affected by the scalar interaction. We construct a simple two Higgs doublet model as a realization of our scenario and consider lepton universality in semileptonic charm and top decays, radiativeBdecay,B-mixing, and$$Z \rightarrow b \bar{b}$$$Z\to b\overline{b}$.

    

   more » « less
4. Search for the $$ {B}_s^0 $$ → μ+μ−γ decay

   https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2024)101  

   Aaij, R ; Abdelmotteleb, A_S W ; Abellan_Beteta, C ; Abudinén, F ; Ackernley, T ; Adefisoye, A A ; Adeva, B ; Adinolfi, M ; Adlarson, P ; Agapopoulou, C ; et al ( July 2024 , Journal of High Energy Physics)

   A search for the fully reconstructed$$ {B}_s^0 $$$B_s^0$→ μ⁺μ⁻γdecay is performed at the LHCb experiment using proton-proton collisions at$$ \sqrt{s} $$$\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 5.4 fb⁻¹. No significant signal is found and upper limits on the branching fraction in intervals of the dimuon mass are set$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{cc}\mathcal{B}\left({B}_s^0\to {\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}\gamma \right)<4.2\times {10}^{-8},& m\left({\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}\right)\in \left[2{m}_{\mu },1.70\right]\textrm{GeV}/{c}^2,\\ {}\mathcal{B}\left({B}_s^0\to {\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}\gamma \right)<7.7\times {10}^{-8},&\ m\left({\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}\right)\in \left[\textrm{1.70,2.88}\right]\textrm{GeV}/{c}^2,\\ {}\mathcal{B}\left({B}_s^0\to {\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}\gamma \right)<4.2\times {10}^{-8},& m\left({\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}\right)\in \left[3.92,{m}_{B_s^0}\right]\textrm{GeV}/{c}^2,\end{array}} $$$\begin{array}{cc}B\left(B_s^0\to {\mu }^{+}{\mu }^{-}\gamma \right)<4.2\times {10}^{-8},& m\left({\mu }^{+}{\mu }^{-}\right)\in \left(2m_{\mu },1.70\right)\mathrm{GeV}/c^2,\\ B\left(B_s^0\to {\mu }^{+}{\mu }^{-}\gamma \right)<7.7\times {10}^{-8},& m\left({\mu }^{+}{\mu }^{-}\right)\in \left(\mathrm{1.70,\; 2.88}\right)\mathrm{GeV}/c^2,\\ B\left(B_s^0\to {\mu }^{+}{\mu }^{-}\gamma \right)<4.2\times {10}^{-8},& m\left({\mu }^{+}{\mu }^{-}\right)\in \left(3.92,m_{B_s^0}\right)\mathrm{GeV}/c^2,\end{array}$

   at 95% confidence level. Additionally, upper limits are set on the branching fraction in the [2m_μ,1.70] GeV/c²dimuon mass region excluding the contribution from the intermediateϕ(1020) meson, and in the region combining all dimuon-mass intervals.

    

   more » « less
5. Measurement of the e+e− → $$ {B}_s^0{\overline{B}}_s^0X $$ cross section in the energy range from 10.63 to 11.02 GeV using inclusive $$ {D}_s^{+} $$ and D0 production

   https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2023)131  

   Zhukova, V ; Mizuk, R ; Adachi, I ; Aihara, H ; Al_Said, S ; Asner, D M ; Atmacan, H ; Aulchenko, V ; Aushev, T ; Ayad, R ; et al ( August 2023 , Journal of High Energy Physics)

   We report the first measurement of the inclusivee⁺e⁻→$$ b\overline{b} $$$b\overline{b}$→$$ {D}_s^{\pm } $$$D_s^{\pm }$Xande⁺e⁻→$$ b\overline{b} $$$b\overline{b}$→ D⁰/$$ {\overline{D}}^0 $$${\overline{D}}^0$Xcross sections in the energy range from 10.63 to 11.02 GeV. Based on these results, we determineσ(e⁺e⁻→$$ {B}_s^0{\overline{B}}_s^0 $$$B_s^0{\overline{B}}_s^0$X) andσ(e⁺e⁻→$$ B\overline{B} $$$B\overline{B}$X) in the same energy range. We measure the fraction of$$ {B}_s^0 $$$B_s^0$events at Υ(10860) to bef_s= ($$ {22.0}_{-2.1}^{+2.0} $$${22.0}_{-2.1}^{+2.0}$)%. We determine also the ratio of the$$ {B}_s^0 $$$B_s^0$inclusive branching fractions$$ \mathcal{B} $$$B$($$ {B}_s^0 $$$B_s^0$→ D⁰/$$ {\overline{D}}^0 $$${\overline{D}}^0$X)/$$ \mathcal{B} $$$B$($$ {B}_s^0 $$$B_s^0$→$$ {D}_s^{\pm } $$$D_s^{\pm }$X) = 0.416 ± 0.018 ± 0.092. The results are obtained using the data collected with the Belle detector at the KEKB asymmetric-energye⁺e⁻collider.

    

   more » « less