More Like this

1. Epigenetic Consequences of In Utero PFAS Exposure: Implications for Development and Long-Term Health

   https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22060917  

   Abdulkadir, Abubakar; Kandel, Shila; Lewis, Niya; D’Auvergne, Oswald; Rosby, Raphyel; Hossain, Ekhtear (June 2025, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health)

   In utero exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) presents significant health concerns, primarily through their role in inducing epigenetic modifications that have lasting consequences. This review aims to elucidate the impact of prenatal PFAS exposure on epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation, histone modification, and non-coding RNA regulation, focusing on developmental and long-term health outcomes. The review synthesizes findings from various studies that link PFAS exposure to alterations in DNA methylation in fetal tissues, such as changes in the methylation of genes like IGF2 and MEST, which are linked to disruptions in growth, neurodevelopment, immune function, and metabolic regulation, potentially increasing the risk of diseases such as diabetes and obesity. We also highlight the compound-specific effects of different PFAS, such as PFOS and PFOA, each showing unique impacts on epigenetic profiles, suggesting varied health risks. Special attention is given to hormonal disruption, oxidative stress, and changes in histone-modifying enzymes such as histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and deacetylases (HDACs), which are pathways through which PFAS influence fetal development. Additionally, we discuss PFAS-induced epigenetic changes in placental tissues, which can alter fetal nutrient supply and hormone regulation. Despite accumulating evidence, significant knowledge gaps remain, particularly regarding the persistence of these changes across the lifespan and potential sex-specific susceptibilities. We explore how advancements in epigenome-wide association studies could bridge these gaps, providing a robust framework for linking prenatal environmental exposures to lifetime health outcomes. Future research directions and regulatory strategies are also discussed, emphasizing the need for intervention to protect vulnerable populations from these environmental pollutants. 

   more » « less
2. Addressing Urgent Questions for PFAS in the 21st Century

   https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c03386  

   Ng, Carla; Cousins, Ian T.; DeWitt, Jamie C.; Glüge, Juliane; Goldenman, Gretta; Herzke, Dorte; Lohmann, Rainer; Miller, Mark; Patton, Sharyle; Scheringer, Martin; et al (September 2021, Environmental Science & Technology)

   Despite decades of research on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), fundamental obstacles remain to addressing worldwide contamination by these chemicals and their associated impacts on environmental quality and health. Here, we propose six urgent questions relevant to science, technology, and policy that must be tackled to address the “PFAS problem”: (1) What are the global production volumes of PFAS, and where are PFAS used? (2) Where are the unknown PFAS hotspots in the environment? (3) How can we make measuring PFAS globally accessible? (4) How can we safely manage PFAS-containing waste? (5) How do we understand and describe the health effects of PFAS exposure? (6) Who pays the costs of PFAS contamination? The importance of each question and barriers to progress are briefly described, and several potential paths forward are proposed. Given the diversity of PFAS and their uses, the extreme persistence of most PFAS, the striking ongoing lack of fundamental information, and the inequity of the health and environmental impacts from PFAS contamination, there is a need for scientific and regulatory communities to work together, with cooperation from PFAS-related industries, to fill in critical data gaps and protect human health and the environment. 

   more » « less
3. A critical review on the potential impacts of neonicotinoid insecticide use: current knowledge of environmental fate, toxicity, and implications for human health

   https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EM00586B  

   Thompson, Darrin A.; Lehmler, Hans-Joachim; Kolpin, Dana W.; Hladik, Michelle L.; Vargo, John D.; Schilling, Keith E.; LeFevre, Gregory H.; Peeples, Tonya L.; Poch, Matthew C.; LaDuca, Lauren E.; et al (June 2020, Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts)

   Neonicotinoid insecticides are widely used in both urban and agricultural settings around the world. Historically, neonicotinoid insecticides have been viewed as ideal replacements for more toxic compounds, like organophosphates, due in part to their perceived limited potential to affect the environment and human health. This critical review investigates the environmental fate and toxicity of neonicotinoids and their metabolites and the potential risks associated with exposure. Neonicotinoids are found to be ubiquitous in the environment, drinking water, and food, with low-level exposure commonly documented below acceptable daily intake standards. Available toxicological data from animal studies indicate possible genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, impaired immune function, and reduced growth and reproductive success at low concentrations, while limited data from ecological or cross-sectional epidemiological studies have identified acute and chronic health effects ranging from acute respiratory, cardiovascular, and neurological symptoms to oxidative genetic damage and birth defects. Due to the heavy use of neonicotinoids and potential for cumulative chronic exposure, these insecticides represent novel risks and necessitate further study to fully understand their risks to humans. 

   more » « less
4. Absorption, distribution, and toxicity of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the brain: a review

   https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EM00228G  

   Cao, Yuexin; Ng, Carla (November 2021, Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts)

   Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a class of synthetic chemicals colloquially known as “forever chemicals” because of their high persistence. PFAS have been detected in the blood, liver, kidney, heart, muscle and brain of various species. Although brain is not a dominant tissue for PFAS accumulation compared to blood and liver, adverse effects of PFAS on brain functions have been identified. Here, we review studies related to the absorption, accumulation, distribution and toxicity of PFAS in the brain. We summarize evidence on two potential mechanisms of PFAS entering the brain: initiating blood–brain barrier (BBB) disassembly through disrupting tight junctions and relying on transporters located at the BBB. PFAS with diverse structures and properties enter and accumulate in the brain with varying efficiencies. Compared to long-chain PFAS, short-chain PFAS may not cross cerebral barriers effectively. According to biomonitoring studies and PFAS exposure experiments, PFAS can accumulate in the brain of humans and wildlife species. With respect to the distribution of PFAS in specific brain regions, the brain stem, hippocampus, hypothalamus, pons/medulla and thalamus are dominant for PFAS accumulation. The accumulation and distribution of PFAS in the brain may lead to toxic effects in the central nervous system (CNS), including PFAS-induced behavioral and cognitive disorders. The specific mechanisms underlying such PFAS-induced neurotoxicity remain to be explored, but two major potential mechanisms based on current understanding are PFAS effects on calcium homeostasis and neurotransmitter alterations in neurons. Based on the information available about PFAS uptake, accumulation, distribution and impacts on the brain, PFAS have the potential to enter and accumulate in the brain at varying levels. The balance of existing studies shows there is some indication of risk in animals, while the human evidence is mixed and warrants further scrutiny. 

   more » « less
5. Quaternary Ammonium Compounds: A Chemical Class of Emerging Concern

   Arnold, W.A.; Blum, A.; Branyan, J.; Bruton, T.A.; Carignan, C.C.; Cortopassi, G.; Datta, S.; DeWitt, J.; Doherty, A.-C.; Halden, R.U.; et al (May 2023, Environmental science and technology)

   Quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs), a large class of chemicals that includes high production volume substances, have been used for decades as antimicrobials, preservatives, and antistatic agents, and for other functions in cleaning, disinfecting, personal care products, and durable consumer goods. QAC use has accelerated in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the banning of 19 antimicrobials from several personal care products by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2016. Studies conducted before and after the onset of the pandemic indicate increased human exposure to QACs. Environmental releases of these chemicals have also increased. Emerging information on adverse environmental and human health impacts of QACs is motivating a reconsideration of the risks and benefits across the life cycle of their production, use, and disposal. This paper presents a critical review of the literature and scientific perspective developed by a multidisciplinary, multi-institutional team of authors from academia, governmental, and nonprofit organizations. The review evaluates currently available information on the ecological and human health profile of QACs and identifies multiple areas of potential concern. Adverse ecological effects include acute and chronic toxicity to susceptible aquatic organisms, with concentrations of some QACs approaching levels of concern. Suspected or known adverse health outcomes include dermal and respiratory effects, developmental and reproductive toxicity, disruption of metabolic function such as lipid homeostasis, and impairment of mitochondrial function. QACs’ role in antimicrobial resistance has also been demonstrated. In the US regulatory system, how a QAC is managed depends on how it is used, for example, in pesticides or personal care products. This can result in the same QACs receiving different degrees of scrutiny depending on the use and the agency regulating it. Further, the EPA’s current method of grouping QACs based on structure, first proposed in 1988, is insufficient to address the wide range of QAC chemistries, potential toxicities, and exposure scenarios. Consequently, exposures to common mixtures of QACs and from multiple sources remain largely unassessed. Some restrictions on the use of QACs have been implemented in the US and elsewhere, primarily focused on personal care products. Assessing the risks posed by QACs is hampered by their vast structural diversity and a lack of quantitative data on exposure and toxicity for the majority of these compounds. This review identifies important data gaps and provides research and policy recommendations for preserving the utility of QAC chemistries while also seeking to limit adverse environmental and human health effects. 

   more » « less