An official website of the United States government
Methods are fundamental to doing research and can directly impact who is included in scientific advances. Given accessibility research's increasing popularity and pervasive barriers to conducting and participating in research experienced by people with disabilities, it is critical to ask how methods are made accessible. Yet papers rarely describe their methods in detail. This paper reports on 17 interviews with accessibility experts about how they include both facilitators and participants with disabilities in popular user research methods. Our findings offer strategies for anticipating access needs while remaining flexible and responsive to unexpected access barriers. We emphasize the importance of considering accessibility at all stages of the research process, and contextualize access work in recent disability and accessibility literature. We explore how technology or processes could reflect a norm of accessibility. Finally, we discuss how various needs intersect and conflict and offer a practical structure for planning accessible research.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on April 25, 2026
Access InContext: Futuring Accessible Prototyping Tools and Methods
The popularity of accessibility research has grown recently, improving digital inclusion for people with disabilities. However, researchers, including those who have disabilities, have attempted to include people with disabilities in all aspects of design, and they have identified a myriad of practical accessibility barriers posed by tools and methods leveraged by human-computer interaction (HCI) researchers during prototyping. To build a more inclusive technological landscape, we must question the effectiveness of existing prototyping tools and methods, repurpose/retrofit existing resources, and build new tools and methods to support the participation of both researchers and people with disabilities within the prototyping design process of novel technologies. This full-day workshop at CHI 2025 will provide a platform for HCI researchers, designers, and practitioners to discuss barriers and opportunities for creating accessible prototyping and promote hands-on ideation and fabrication exercises aimed at futuring accessible prototyping.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2333220
- PAR ID:
- 10615886
- Publisher / Repository:
- ACM
- Date Published:
- ISBN:
- 9798400713958
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1 to 7
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Location:
- Yokohama Japan
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
AI education is rapidly becoming essential as artificial intelligence transforms industries, yet students with disabilities often encounter significant barriers to learning and engagement. This paper examines accessibility challenges encountered by learners with visual, cognitive, and physical disabilities when using foundational tools for AI development. Using HuggingFace, an influential open-source platform, as a case study, we analyze barriers such as insufficient screen reader support, complex interfaces, and information overload. We propose design recommendations to promote equity and inclusivity in AI tools, aiming to empower diverse learners to thrive in AI education. Our work highlights the importance of inclusive design for CS educators, researchers, and policymakers.more » « less
-
AI education is rapidly becoming essential as artificial intelligence transforms industries, yet students with disabilities often encounter significant barriers to learning and engagement. This paper examines accessibility challenges encountered by learners with visual, cognitive, and physical disabilities when using foundational tools for AI development. Using HuggingFace, an influential open-source platform, as a case study, we analyze barriers such as insufficient screen reader support, complex interfaces, and information overload. We propose design recommendations to promote equity and inclusivity in AI tools, aiming to empower diverse learners to thrive in AI education. Our work highlights the importance of inclusive design for CS educators, researchers, and policymakers.more » « less
-
Background: Personal health technologies, including wearable tracking devices and mobile apps, have great potential to equip the general population with the ability to monitor and manage their health. However, being designed for sighted people, much of their functionality is largely inaccessible to the blind and low-vision (BLV) population, threatening the equitable access to personal health data (PHD) and health care services. Objective: This study aims to understand why and how BLV people collect and use their PHD and the obstacles they face in doing so. Such knowledge can inform accessibility researchers and technology companies of the unique self-tracking needs and accessibility challenges that BLV people experience. Methods: We conducted a web-based and phone survey with 156 BLV people. We reported on quantitative and qualitative findings regarding their PHD tracking practices, needs, accessibility barriers, and work-arounds. Results: BLV respondents had strong desires and needs to track PHD, and many of them were already tracking their data despite many hurdles. Popular tracking items (ie, exercise, weight, sleep, and food) and the reasons for tracking were similar to those of sighted people. BLV people, however, face many accessibility challenges throughout all phases of self-tracking, from identifying tracking tools to reviewing data. The main barriers our respondents experienced included suboptimal tracking experiences and insufficient benefits against the extended burden for BLV people. Conclusions: We reported the findings that contribute to an in-depth understanding of BLV people’s motivations for PHD tracking, tracking practices, challenges, and work-arounds. Our findings suggest that various accessibility challenges hinder BLV individuals from effectively gaining the benefits of self-tracking technologies. On the basis of the findings, we discussed design opportunities and research areas to focus on making PHD tracking technologies accessible for all, including BLV people.more » « less
-
The rise of maker communities and fabrication tools creates new opportunities for participation in design work. With this has come an interest in increasing the accessibility of making for people with disabilities, which has mainly emphasized independence and empowerment through the creation of more accessible fabrication tools. To understand and rethink the notion of accessible making, we analyze the context and practices of a particular site of making: the communal weaving studio within an assisted living facility for people with vision impairments. Our analysis helps reconsider the material and social processes that constitute accessible making, including the ways makers attend to interactive material properties, negotiate co-creative embodied work, and value the labor of making. We discuss future directions for design and research on accessible making while highlighting tensions around assistance, collaboration, and how disabled labor is valued.more » « less
