skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


This content will become publicly available on April 13, 2026

Title: An 81.7M Ω-lnput-lmpedance 179.5dB-FOMSNDR 1.8Vpp-lnput-Range Noise-Shaping-SAR-Based Sensing Frontend with Dynamic Input-Impedance Boosting and Prediction-Assisted Mismatch-Shaping-DEM
Award ID(s):
2239915 2151788
PAR ID:
10616283
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
IEEE
Date Published:
Page Range / eLocation ID:
1 to 3
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Recent years have seen growing interest in market-shaping – the intentional efforts of firms, consumers, governments, and nonprofits to transform, disrupt, or maintain market systems. However, the ‘dark side’ of market shaping – its strategic use to entrench power and shift burdens onto others – remains underexplored. This paper examines the historical case of U.S. beverage container production (1950–1990) using institutional work as a theoretical lens. Analyzing actions taken by container and beverage manufacturers, industry associations, activists, media, and government, we find industry actors collaboratively sustained dominance by simultaneously making and breaking institutions, with little regard for broader environmental and societal consequences. These shaping efforts were systemic, evolving, and increasingly channeled through specialized, strategically focused industry associations. In contrast, opposing actors lacked comparable coordination and influence. We contribute to market-shaping literature and extend critical macromarketing debates by foregrounding asymmetrical shaping and the urgent need to evaluate such strategies through normative frameworks that consider ecological and social limits. 
    more » « less
  2. This Special Issue “Shaping Tomorrow’s Arctic” explores the past, present and future of Arctic sustainability. Decisions made now are fundamentally shaping the multiple Arctics of 2050. In looking forward, what can we learn from past experiences, as well as from recent responses to change? What steps should we be taking now to lay the foundation for equitable, just and inclusive Arctics? How might futures differ for multiple Arctic populations, economies, cultures and governance (Figure 1)? These are some of the profound questions we ask in this Special Issue. 
    more » « less
  3. In reinforcement learning, especially in sparse-reward domains, many environment steps are required to observe reward information. In order to increase the frequency of such observations, potential-based reward shaping (PBRS) has been proposed as a method of providing a more dense reward signal while leaving the optimal policy invariant. However, the required potential function must be carefully designed with task-dependent knowledge to not deter training performance. In this work, we propose a bootstrapped method of reward shaping, termed BS-RS, in which the agent's current estimate of the state-value function acts as the potential function for PBRS. We provide convergence proofs for the tabular setting, give insights into training dynamics for deep RL, and show that the proposed method improves training speed in the Atari suite. 
    more » « less
  4. null (Ed.)
    Lessons from the recent past. 
    more » « less