An official website of the United States government
Abstract Floral microbes, including bacteria and fungi, alter nectar quality, thus changing pollinator visitation. Conversely, pollinator visitation can change the floral microbial community.Most studies on dispersal of floral microbes have focused on bees, ants or hummingbirds, yet Lepidoptera are important pollinators.We asked (a) where are microbes present on the butterfly body, (b) do butterflies transfer microbes while foraging, and (c) how does butterfly foraging affect microbial abundance on different floret structures.The tarsi and proboscis had significantly more microbes than the thorax in wild‐caughtGlaucopsyche lygdamus(Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) andSpeyeria mormonia(Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae).Glaucopsyche lygdamus, a smaller‐bodied species, had fewer microbes thanS. mormonia.As a marker for microbes, we used a bacterium (Rhodococcus fascians,near NCBI Y11196) isolated from aS. mormoniathat was foraging for nectar, and examined its dispersal byG. lygdamusandS. mormoniavisiting florets ofPyrrocoma crocea(Asteraceae). Microbial dispersal among florets correlated positively with bacterial abundance in the donor floret. Dispersal also depended on butterfly species, age, and bacterial load carried by the butterfly.Recipient florets had less bacteria than donor florets. The nectaries had more bacteria than the anthers or the stigmas, while anthers and stigmas did not differ from each other. There was no differential transmission among floral organs.Lepidoptera thus act as vectors of floral microbes. Including Lepidoptera is thus crucial to an understanding of plant–pollinator–microbe interactions. Future studies should consider the role of vectored microbes in lepidopteran ecology and fitness.
more »
« less
Nectar peroxide: assessing variation among plant species, microbial tolerance, and effects on microbial community assembly
Nectar contains antimicrobial constituents including hydrogen peroxide, yet it is unclear how widespread nectar hydrogen peroxide might be among plant species or how effective it is against common nectar microbes.Here, we surveyed 45 flowering plant species across 23 families and reviewed the literature to assess the field‐realistic range of nectar hydrogen peroxide (Aim 1). We experimentally explored whether plant defense hormones increase nectar hydrogen peroxide (Aim 2). Further, we tested the hypotheses that variation in microbial tolerance to peroxide is predicted by the microbe isolation environment (Aim 3); increasing hydrogen peroxide in flowers alters microbial abundance and community assembly (Aim 4), and that the microbial community context affects microbial tolerance to peroxide (Aim 5).Peroxide in sampled plants ranged from undetectable toc3000 μM, with 50% of species containing less than 100 μM. Plant defensive hormones did not affect hydrogen peroxide in floral nectar, but enzymatically upregulated hydrogen peroxide significantly reduced microbial growth.Together, our results suggest that nectar peroxide is a common but not pervasive antimicrobial defense among nectar‐producing plants. Microbes vary in tolerance and detoxification ability, and co‐growth can facilitate the survival and growth of less tolerant species, suggesting a key role for community dynamics in the microbial colonization of nectar.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1846266
- PAR ID:
- 10616371
- Publisher / Repository:
- New Phytologist
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- New Phytologist
- Volume:
- 246
- Issue:
- 3
- ISSN:
- 0028-646X
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1361 to 1376
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract I asked whether Grime's triangle of competitive, stress tolerance and ruderal ecological strategies—which was originally developed for plants—applies to microbes.I conducted a synthesis of empirical studies that tested relationships among microbial traits presumed to define the competitive, stress tolerance and ruderal, and other ecological strategies.There was broad support for Grime's triangle. However, the ecological strategies were inconsistently linked to shifts in microbial communities under environmental changes like nitrogen and phosphorus addition, warming, drought, etc. We may be missing important ecological strategies that more closely influence microbial community composition under shifting environmental conditions.We may need to start by documenting changes in microbial communities in response to environmental conditions at fine spatiotemporal scales relevant for microbes. We can then develop empirically based ecological strategies, rather than modifying those based on plant ecology.Synthesis. Microbes appear to sort into similar ecological strategies as plants. However, these microbial ecological strategies do not consistently predict how community composition will shift under environmental change. By starting ‘from the ground up’, we may be able to delineate ecological strategies more relevant for microbes.more » « less
-
Summary Microbial communities can rapidly respond to stress, meaning plants may encounter altered soil microbial communities in stressful environments. These altered microbial communities may then affect natural selection on plants. Because stress can cause lasting changes to microbial communities, microbes may also cause legacy effects on plant selection that persist even after the stress ceases.To explore how microbial responses to stress and persistent microbial legacy effects of stress affect natural selection, we grewChamaecrista fasciculataplants in stressful (salt, herbicide, or herbivory) or nonstressful conditions with microbes that had experienced each of these environments in the previous generation.Microbial community responses to stress generally counteracted the effects of stress itself on plant selection, thereby weakening the strength of stress as a selective agent. Microbial legacy effects of stress altered plant selection in nonstressful environments, suggesting that stress‐induced changes to microbes may continue to affect selection after stress is lifted.These results suggest that soil microbes may play a cryptic role in plant adaptation to stress, potentially reducing the strength of stress as a selective agent and altering the evolutionary trajectory of plant populations.more » « less
-
ABSTRACT Plant–microbe associations are ubiquitous, but parsing contributions of dispersal, host filtering, competition and temperature on microbial community composition is challenging. Floral nectar‐inhabiting microbes, which can influence flowering plant health and pollination, offer a tractable system to disentangle community assembly processes. We inoculated a synthetic community of yeasts and bacteria into nectars of 31 plant species while excluding pollinators. We monitored weather and, after 24 h, collected and cultured communities. We found a strong signature of plant species on resulting microbial abundance and community composition, in part explained by plant phylogeny and nectar peroxide content, but not floral morphology. Increasing temperature reduced microbial diversity, while higher minimum temperatures increased growth, suggesting complex ecological effects of temperature. Consistent nectar microbial communities within plant species could enable plant or pollinator adaptation. Our work supports the roles of host identity, traits and temperature in microbial community assembly, and indicates diversity–productivity relationships within host‐associated microbiomes.more » « less
-
Summary Stress often induces plant trait plasticity, and microbial communities also alter plant traits. Therefore, it is unclear how much plasticity results from direct plant responses to stress vs indirect responses due to stress‐induced changes in soil microbial communities.To test how microbes and microbial community responses to stress affect the ecology and potentially the evolution of plant plasticity, I grew plants in four stress environments (salt, herbicide, herbivory, and no stress) with microbes that had responded to these same environments or with sterile inoculant.Plants delayed flowering under stress only when inoculated with live microbial communities, and this plasticity was maladaptive. However, microbial communities responded to stress in ways that accelerated flowering across all environments. Microbes also affected the expression of genetic variation for plant flowering time and specific leaf area, as well as genetic variation for plasticity of both traits, and disrupted a positive genetic correlation for plasticity in response to herbicide and herbivory stress, suggesting that microbes may affect the pace of plant evolution.Together, these results highlight an important role for soil microbes in plant plastic responses to stress and suggest that microbes may alter the evolution of plant plasticity.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.70050
