An official website of the United States government
Despite the emergence of eco-friendly solvents and scalable methods for polymeric membrane fabrication, studies on the impacts of solvent synthesis and manufacturing scale-up have not been conducted. To this end, a life cycle assessment (LCA) was developed with the goal of determining the global environmental and health impacts of producing polysulfone (PSf) membranes with the solvents PolarClean and γ-valerolactone (GVL) via doctor blade extrusion (DBE) and slot die coating (SDC). Along with PolarClean and GVL, dimethylacetamide (DMAc) and N-methyl-2-pyyrolidone (NMP) were included in the LCA as conventional solvents for comparison. The dope solution viscosity had a major influence on the material inventories; to produce a normalized membrane unit on a surface area basis, a larger quantity of PSf-PolarClean-GVL materials was required due to its high viscosity. The life cycle impact assessment found electricity and PolarClean to be major contributing parameters to multiple impact categories during membrane fabrication. The commercial synthesis route of PolarClean selected in this study required hazardous materials derived from petrochemicals, which increased its impact on membrane fabrication. Due to more materials being required to fabricate membranes via SDC to account for tool fluid priming, the PSf-PolarClean-GVL membrane fabricated via SDC exhibited the highest impacts. The amount of electricity and concentration of PolarClean were the most sensitive parameters according to Spearman’s rank coefficient analysis. A scenario analysis in which the regional energy grid was substituted found that using the Swedish grid, which comprises far more renewable technologies than the global and US energy grids, significantly lowered impacts in most categories. Despite the reported eco-friendly benefits of using PolarClean and GVL as alternatives to conventional organic solvents, the results in this study provide a wider perspective of membrane fabrication process impacts, highlighting that upstream impacts can counterbalance the beneficial properties of alternative materials.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on July 3, 2026
Using life cycle assessment to design emerging electricity generation technologies
Novel energy technologies, especially decentralized electricity generation systems, are increasingly being designed and implemented. However, potential environmental impacts are frequently recognized after installing new energy systems at full scale, at which point modification comes at a high cost. Life cycle assessment (LCA) can be used throughout the design-to-commercialization process to prevent this outcome, despite the challenges of emerging energy technology LCAs, like comparability, lack of data, scale-up difficulties, and uncertainties that are not typically faced while evaluating existing and established systems. The complexity and urgency of evaluating climate change impacts of novel energy technologies during the research and development stage reveal the need for guidance, presented in this study, with an emphasis on data collection, data processing, and uncertainty analysis. We outline best practices in choosing among several methods that have been employed in LCA studies to fill gaps in input data, including machine learning. Additionally, we discuss how design can be guided by LCA through assessment setting and delineation of scenarios or case studies, in order to prevent unnecessary effort and maximize the amount of useful, interpretable results. We also discuss the utility of complementary analyses, including global sensitivity analysis, neural network, Monte Carlo analysis that differentiates between uncertainty and variability parameters, and optimization. This guidance has the potential to make emerging electricity generation system implementation ultimately effective in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, through the methodological use of LCA in the design process.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2316124
- PAR ID:
- 10616919
- Publisher / Repository:
- Elsevier
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Energy Conversion and Management: X
- Volume:
- 27
- ISSN:
- 2590-1745
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 101122
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
null (Ed.)Life cycle assessment (LCA), a tool used to assess the environmental impacts of products and processes, has been used to evaluate a range of aquaculture systems. Eighteen LCA studies were reviewed which included assess- ments of recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS), flow-through systems, net cages, and pond systems. This re- view considered the potential to mitigate environmental burdens with a movement from extensive to intensive aquaculture systems. Due to the diversity in study results, specific processes (feed, energy, and infrastructure) and specific impact categories (land use, water use, and eutrophication potential) were analyzed in-depth. The comparative analysis indicated there was a possible shift from local to global impacts with a progression from extensive to intensive systems, if mitigation strategies were not performed. The shift was partially due to increased electricity requirements but also varied with electricity source. The impacts from infrastructure were less than 13 % of the environmental impact and considered negligible. For feed, the environmental impacts were typically more dependent on feed conversion ratio (FCR) than the type of system. Feed also contributed to over 50 % of the impacts on land use, second only to energy carriers. The analysis of water use indicated intensive recirculating systems efficiently reduce water use as compared to extensive systems; however, at present, studies have only considered direct water use and future work is required that incorporates indirect and consumptive water use. Alternative aquaculture systems that can improve the total nutrient uptake and production yield per material and energy based input, thereby reducing the overall emissions per unit of feed, should be further investigated to optimize the overall of aquaculture systems, considering both global and local environmental impacts. While LCA can be a valuable tool to evaluate trade-offs in system designs, the results are often location and species specific. Therefore, it is critical to consider both of these criteria in conjunction with LCA results when developing aquaculture systems.more » « less
-
The increasing volume of electronic waste (e-waste) creates significant environmental and economic challenges which demands practical management strategies. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) has been known as a principal tool for evaluating the environmental impact of e-waste recycling and disposal methods. However, its application is hampered by inconsistencies in methodology, data limitations, and variations in system boundaries. This study provides a review of current LCA tools used in e-waste analysis and identifies gaps and opportunities for improvement. It categorizes studies into three groups: studies that applied LCA to product and process optimization, impact evaluation, and policy development. Findings reveal that LCA has been helpful in assessing the sustainability of different recycling strategies. However, significant variations exist in methodological approaches and data accuracy. Challenges such as the lack of standardized LCA protocols, the limited availability of regionspecific impact data, and inconsistencies in assessment methodologies are still barriers to its widespread adoption. Finally, the study discusses emerging trends in LCA aimed at addressing current gaps, including the incorporation of machine learning and artificial intelligence for predictive modeling, dynamic impact assessment frameworks, and the role of real-time data collection via IoT-based sensors.more » « less
-
Abstract Studies exploring long-term energy system transitions rely on resource cost-supply curves derived from estimates of renewable energy (RE) potentials to generate wind and solar power projections. However, estimates of RE potentials are characterized by large uncertainties stemming from methodological assumptions that vary across studies, including factors such as the suitability of land and the performance and configuration of technology. Based on a synthesis of modeling approaches and parameter values used in prior studies, we explore the implications of these uncertain assumptions for onshore wind and solar photovoltaic electricity generation projections globally using the Global Change Analysis Model. We show that variability in parametric assumptions related to land use (e.g. land suitability) are responsible for the most substantial uncertainty in both wind and solar generation projections. Additionally, assumptions about the average turbine installation density and turbine technology are responsible for substantial uncertainty in wind generation projections. Under scenarios that account for climate impacts on wind and solar energy, we find that these parametric uncertainties are far more significant than those emerging from differences in climate models and scenarios in a global assessment, but uncertainty surrounding climate impacts (across models and scenarios) have significant effects regionally, especially for wind. Our analysis suggests the need for studies focusing on long-term energy system transitions to account for this uncertainty.more » « less
-
Abstract As the building sector faces global challenges that affect urban supplies of food, water and energy, multifaceted sustainability solutions need to be re-examined through the lens of built environments. Aquaponics, a strategy that combines recirculating aquaculture with hydroponics to optimize fish and plant production, has been recognized as one of "ten technologies which could change our lives" by merit of its potential to revolutionize how we feed urban populations. To holistically assess the environmental performance of urban aquaponic farms, impacts generated by aquaponic systems must be combined with impacts generated by host envelopes. This paper outlines the opportunities and challenges of using life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate and design urban aquaponic farms. The methodology described here is part of a larger study of urban integration of aquaponics conducted by the interdisciplinary research consortium CITYFOOD. First, the challenges of applying LCA in architecture and agriculture are outlined. Next, the urban aquaponic farm is described as a series of unit process flows. Using the ISO 14040:2006 framework for developing an LCA, subsequent LCA phases are described, focusing on scenario-specific challenges and tools. Particular attention is given to points of interaction between growing systems and host buildings that can be optimized to serve both. Using a hybrid LCA framework that incorporates methods from the building sector as well as the agricultural sector, built environment professionals can become key players in interdisciplinary solutions for the food-water-energy nexus and the design of sustainable urban food systems.more » « less
