skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Unpacking Engineering Practices for Curricular Assessment: Aligning Lab Practices and Assessment Items Using the 3D-LAP
Award ID(s):
2020195
PAR ID:
10617524
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
American Chemical Society
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Journal of Chemical Education
ISSN:
0021-9584
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. null (Ed.)
    This case study investigated preservice secondary mathematics teachers’ (PSMTs’) developing understanding of formative assessment as a way to leverage mathematical practices for student learning. Qualitative data came from PSMTs’ responses to a learning sequence designed to help them develop nuanced and disciplinary-specific understandings of formative assessment. Analyses suggest a trajectory for PSMTs learning to use formative assessment in problem-solving environments, but also shows how the orientation of one PSMT continued to obstruct her progress. The results suggest that mathematics teacher educators must themselves use formative assessment that supports PMSTs’ developing orientations to currently suggested ways of teaching. 
    more » « less
  2. It is important that change in physics programs is deliberate, evidenced-based, and engages multiple stakeholders. To assess the state of departmental change practices, the Effective Practices for Physics Programs (EP3) Initiative regularly runs a survey of department chairs to measure departmental cultures of assessment. The 2023 survey received 163 research-consenting responses. This paper presents two claims based on these survey results: (1) assessments are largely not seen as leading to change, although chairs aspire for them to do so, and (2) chairs see substantial room for improvement in how they go about changing the undergraduate physics program, especially when it comes to engaging multiple stakeholders and using data effectively. The significant difference between current and ideal points to areas where shifting the culture within departments could have support from departmental leadership. 
    more » « less
  3. null (Ed.)