An official website of the United States government
Mathematics anxiety is a phenomenon characterized by feelings of tension and nervousness towards math (Ashcraft, 2002). Unsurprisingly, it has been extensively documented to be negatively associated with mathematical performance (Ramirez et al., 2018). Research consistently shows that math anxiety impacts cognitive processing abilities and diminishes working memory resources, leading to poorer problem-solving skills and lower achievement in mathematical tasks (Ashcraft & Krause, 2007; Ramirez et al., 2013). It is important to consider students with different math anxiety levels and patterns when creating new math learning interventions, as math anxiety affects how students perceive and learn from mathematical interventions. Recognizing and accommodating the diverse math interventions to math anxiety can help create more effective learning environments. In this dissertation, I will present three studies that examine how math anxiety interplays with math performance and manifests in learning.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on November 10, 2025
Qualitative Review of Interventions used to Mitigate Math Anxiety
Math anxiety is pervasive in our society, and it is causing problems for students who want to enter a science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) pathway. Recent research has suggested that math anxiety, and not math ability, is a better predictor of performance and perseverance in STEM. Interventions to mitigate this anxiety must get to the root of the problem and provide students tools to help ease these feelings when they come to disrupt performance. Our approach uses techniques from mindfulness and self-compassion, which have been linked to reducing anxiety. We have developed modules that can be used in a math (or science) courses to help students understand the anxiety they face. In this paper we examine one of the interventions used, the pre-exam writing, and how it showed a 75 percent increase in statements of confidence and a doubling of statements of positive feelings over the semester.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1834569
- PAR ID:
- 10629501
- Publisher / Repository:
- Kent State University
- Date Published:
- ISBN:
- 978-1-7348057-3-4
- Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
- math anxiety, self-compassion, mindfulness
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Location:
- Cleveland, OH
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Lamberg, T; Moss, D (Ed.)Math anxiety refers to feelings people get when facing computational challenges. The fear of failure often causes people to avoid activities, like taking challenging mathematics courses or choosing majors that require mathematics. Grit describes how people persist or persevere in the wake of failure. This article looks at factors that contribute to a person having grit and the interaction of grit and math anxiety. Students (N = 258) enrolled in college math classes at a large university completed a set of surveys that indicated their levels of self-compassion, mindfulness, self-efficacy, math anxiety, and grit. The analyses of the data found that grit predicted math anxiety, and that self-compassion, mindfulness, and self-efficacy predicted grit. The results of this study suggest that promoting factors that help students develop grit can in turn affect their math anxiety and thus their persistence in mathematics courses and STEM majors.more » « less
-
Many factors may contribute to women being underrepresented and marginalized in college-level geoscience majors. Limited research has examined students’ math anxiety as a possible factor. To address the dearth of research, we conducted a qualitative study to explore the math anxiety experiences held by students in college-level geoscience classes. Through analysis of students’ written math narratives, we identified three themes capturing students’ integrated math anxiety experiences (IMAEs), which integrated students’ feelings, physiological reactions, and thoughts. Students with Thriving IMAEs liked math and had positive assessments of themselves in math. Students with Agonizing IMAEs had negative feelings and thoughts about math and experienced negative physiological reactions. Students with Persisting IMAEs had positive and negative feelings and thoughts, but thought that, ultimately, they could persist in math. A higher percentage of women than men held Agonizing IMAEs, and a lower percentage of women than men held Thriving IMAEs. Students in introductory geoscience classes had a range of IMAEs, which may have an important role in their success in class and in their decisions to take additional geoscience classes.more » « less
-
Math anxiety is negatively correlated with student performance and can result in avoidance of further math/STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) classes and careers. Cooperative learning (i.e., group work) is a proven strategy that can reduce math anxiety and has additional social and pedagogical benefits. However, depending on the group individuals, some peer interactions can mitigate anxiety, while others exacerbate it. We propose a mathematical modeling approach to help untangle and explore this complex dynamic. We introduce a modification of the Hegselmann–Krause bounded confidence model, including both attractive and repulsive interactions to simulate how math anxiety levels are affected by pairwise student interactions. The model is simple but provides interesting qualitative predictions. In particular, Monte Carlo simulations show that there is an optimal group size to minimize average math anxiety, and that switching group members randomly at certain frequencies can dramatically reduce math anxiety levels. The model is easily adaptable to incorporate additional personal and societal factors, making it ripe for future research.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)The Academy of Engineering Success (AcES) program, established in 2012 and supported by NSF S-STEM award number 1644119 throughout 2016-2021, employs literature-based, best practices to support and retain underprepared and underrepresented students in engineering through graduation with the ultimate goal of diversifying the engineering workforce. A total of 71 students, including 21 students supported by S-STEM scholarships, participated in the AcES program between 2016-2019 at a large R1 institution in the mid-Atlantic region. All AcES students participate in a common program during their first year, comprised of: a one-week summer bridge experience, a common fall professional development course and spring “Engineering in History” course, and a common academic advisor. These students also have opportunities for: (1) faculty-student, student-student, and industry mentor-student interaction, (2) academic support and student success education, and (3) major and career exploration – all designed to help students develop feelings of institutional inclusion, engineering self-efficacy and identity, and academic and professional success skills. They also participate in the GRIT, Longitudinal Assessment of Engineering Self-Efficacy (LAESE), and the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) surveys plus individual and focus group interviews at the start, midpoint, and end of each fall semester and at the end of the spring semester. The surveys provide a measure of students’ GRIT, their beliefs related to the intrinsic value of engineering and learning, their feelings of inclusion and test anxiety, and their self-efficacy related to engineering, math, and coping skills. The interviews provide information related to the student experience, feelings of inclusion, and program impact. Institutional data, combined with the survey and interview responses, are used to examine four research questions designed to examine the relationship of the elements of the AcES program to participants’ academic success and retention in engineering. Early analyses of the student retention data and survey responses from the 2017 and 2018 cohorts indicated students who ultimately left engineering before the start of their second year initially scored higher in areas of engineering self-efficacy and test anxiety, than those who stayed in engineering, while those who retained to the second year began their engineering education with lower self-efficacy scores, but higher scores related to the belief in the intrinsic value of engineering, learning strategy use, and coping self-efficacy. These results suggest that students who start with unrealistically high expectations of their performance leave engineering at higher rates than students who start with lower personal performance expectations, but have stronger value of the field and strategies for meeting challenges. These data appear to support the Kruger-Dunning effect in which students with limited knowledge of a specific field overestimate their abilities to perform in that area or underestimate the level of effort success may require. This paper will add an analysis of the academic success and retention data from 2019 cohort to this research, discuss the impact of COVID-19 to this program and research, as well as illuminate the quantitative results with the qualitative data from individual and focus group interviews regarding the aspects of the AcES program that impact student success, their expectations and methods for overcoming academic challenges, and their feelings of motivation and inclusion.more » « less
