An official website of the United States government
Abstract The Poynting vector (Poynting flux) from Earth's magnetosphere downward toward its ionosphere carries the energy that powers the Joule heating in the ionosphere and thermosphere. The Joule heating controls fundamental ionospheric properties affecting the entire magnetosphere‐ionosphere‐thermosphere system, so it is necessary to understand when and where the Poynting flux is significant. Taking advantage of new data sets generated from DMSP (Defense Meteorological Satellite Program) observations, we investigate the Poynting flux distribution within and around the auroral zone, where most magnetosphere‐ionosphere (M‐I) dynamics and thus Joule heating occurs. We find that the Poynting flux, which is generally larger under more active conditions, is concentrated in the sunlit cusp and near the interface between Region 1 and 2 currents. The former concentration suggests voltage generators drive the cusp dynamics. The latter concentration shows asymmetries with respect to the interface between the Region 1 and 2 currents. We show that these reflect the controlling impact of subauroral polarization streams and dawnside auroral polarization streams on the Poynting flux.
more »
« less
Statistical Distribution of Dawnside Auroral Polarization Streams
Abstract Dawnside auroral polarization streams (DAPS) are fast eastward flows in the dawn convection cell of Earth's ionosphere. With a steep flow gradient near the interface between Region 1 and 2 currents and a peak poleward of it, DAPS were suggested to be responsible for instabilities and dramatic events in the magnetosphere‐ionosphere (M‐I) system. To predict these events, it is important to investigate when and where DAPS prefer to occur and how they are related to other M‐I phenomena. We conduct this investigation statistically using 10 years of Swarm data and find that DAPS under sunlit and dark ionospheric conditions exhibit different dependencies on magnetic local times and geomagnetic activities, reflecting a complicated interplay between magnetotail dynamics and ionospheric conductance. The statistical results also reveal a strong correlation between DAPS and embedded Region 2 currents. These findings provide new insights into the DAPS generation mechanism.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10629610
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Volume:
- 52
- Issue:
- 13
- ISSN:
- 0094-8276
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
An earthquake is a seismic event resulting from a sudden release of energy in the lithosphere, which produces waves that can propagate through the atmosphere into the ionosphere, causing ionospheric disturbances, and excites an additional electric field in the lower ionosphere. Two large-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances (LSTIDs) at daytime Turkey longitudes were found, with phase speeds of 534 and 305 m/s, respectively, after the second strong earthquake at 10:24 UT on 6 February 2023. During strong earthquakes, the equatorial ionospheric currents including the E-region equatorial electrojet (EEJ) and F-region ionospheric radial current (IRC) might be perturbed. At the Tatuoca station in Brazil, we observed a stronger-than-usual horizontal magnetic field associated with the EEJ, with a magnitude of ~100 nT. EEJ perturbations are mainly controlled by neutral winds, especially zonal winds. In the equatorial F-region, a wave perturbation of the IRC was caused by a balance of the electric field generated by the zonal winds at ~15° MLat, the F-region local winds driven by atmospheric resonance, and the additional polarization electric field. Our findings better the understanding of the complex interplay between seismic events and ionospheric current disturbances.more » « less
-
Magnetospheric precipitation plays an important role for the coupling of Magnetosphere, Ionosphere, and Thermosphere (M-I-T) systems. Particles from different origins could be energized through various physical mechanisms and in turn disturb the Ionosphere, the ionized region of the Earth’s atmosphere that is important for telecommunication and spacecraft operations. Known to cause aurora, bright displays of light across the night sky, magnetospheric particle precipitation, modifies ionospheric conductance further affecting the plasma convection, field-aligned (FAC) and ionospheric currents, and ionospheric/thermospheric temperature and densities. Therefore, understanding the properties of different sources of magnetospheric precipitation and their relative roles on electrodynamic coupling of M-I across a broad range of spatiotemporal scales is crucial. In this paper, we detail some of the important open questions regarding the origins of magnetospheric particle precipitation and how precipitation affects ionospheric conductance. In a companion paper titled “The Significance of Magnetospheric Precipitation for the Coupling of Magnetosphere-Ionosphere-Thermosphere Systems: Effects on Ionospheric Conductance”, we describe how particle precipitation affects the vertical structure of the ionospheric conductivity and provide recommendations to improve its modelling.more » « less
-
Abstract Since the discovery of the large‐scale field‐aligned currents it is widely acknowledged that gaps exist between the Region 1 (R1) and Region 2 (R2) currents in which the current values are relatively small as compared to neighboring regions. Assuming that the field‐aligned currents are generated by plasma pressure gradients, we analyzed data collected by the THEMIS satellites between 2007 and 2011 to identify regions with very low plasma pressure gradients (pressure plateaus), which could be responsible for the appearance of these gaps. It was found that the pressure profiles with low radial gradients are typically located between 8 and 10 Radii around the Earth. Projections of pressure plateau regions onto ionospheric altitudes, for both individual events and on a statistical basis, coincide with the locations of gaps between Iijima and Potemra field‐aligned currents. The role played by identified pressure plateaus in shaping the pattern of large‐scale field‐aligned currents is discussed.more » « less
-
Abstract Atmospheric planetary waves play an important role in shaping how the ionosphere is coupled to the rest of the Earth's atmosphere. Of significant interest in this study are the 2‐, 3‐, and 6‐day planetary waves. Using multiple long‐term datasets, we performed an extensive survey of these wave events in the atmosphere and ionosphere. Our results show that 3‐day (80%) and 6‐day (92%) oscillations in the ionosphere observed from the ground have a known driver that originated mostly from a planetary wave, but 2‐day oscillations often do not. While some of the 2‐ and 3‐day ionospheric oscillations are associated with random fluctuations from the sun or magnetosphere, almost none of the 6‐day oscillations in the ionosphere are associated with these external drivers. For the 2‐day oscillations, there is a significant change in the correspondence between the ionospheric oscillation and known drivers during solstices (69%) compared to equinoxes (36%). The impact of the external drivers on 2‐day oscillations in the ionosphere during equinoxes is ∼2 times larger than during solstices. When generating a corresponding response in the ionosphere, the strength of the amplitudes of 2‐day westward wavenumber‐3 planetary waves made a clear impact, but less clear for 3‐day eastward 1 and 6‐day eastward/westward planetary waves, revealing that wave amplitude is significant for driving ionospheric response. There is a likelihood of a 3‐day eastward 1/6‐day eastward planetary wave event generating a corresponding response in the ionosphere to be more when the solar activity conditions are low compared to when it is high.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL116467
