skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


This content will become publicly available on January 24, 2026

Title: The accessibility and inaccessibility of urban public charging station
Abstract Unlike refueling at gas stations, charging an electric vehicle (EV) requires significantly more time, ranging from 20 minutes to over an hour, even with the fastest chargers. This prolonged charging duration introduces unique complexities to the fundamental understanding of public charging station (PCS) accessibility, raises questions about the ongoing relevance of spatial proximity for different population groups, and highlights the need to consider amenities near PCS that users can access along their daily routines. To account for these critical distinctions, we introduce visit-based accessibility, a metric that evaluates PCS availability relative to amenities frequented during urban routine activities. Leveraging data from over 28,000 PCSs, 5.2 million points of interest (POIs), and mobility patterns from more than 35 million cell phone users across 20 major U.S. metropolitan areas, we reveal a striking mismatch between PCS locations and the spatial proximity to and the daily needs of their intended users. While existing PCSs are spatially proximate to lower-income communities, our visit-based measure reveals significant disparities, as these communities' routine activities align significantly less with PCS locations. Furthermore, when considering dwell time at nearby amenities, higher-income communities exhibit better alignment of PCSs with routine activities and longer dwell times at nearby POIs, which are also the most extensively covered by existing PCSs. Finally, our analysis reveals that experienced income and racial segregation are likely the major impedance for accessing PCSs that are spatially adjacent, which highlights a hidden social barrier where greater divergence from typical social encounters near charging infrastructure is associated with lower visit rates to PCSs. These findings underscore the necessity for targeted strategies to ensure equitable access to charging infrastructure, addressing both spatial and functional disparities to promote sustainable and inclusive urban development.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2514166 2323732
PAR ID:
10632412
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Research Square
Date Published:
Format(s):
Medium: X
Institution:
Research Square
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. In this study, we raise the concern that current understandings of user perceptions and decision-making processes may jeopardize the sustainable development of charging infrastructure and wider EV adoption. This study addresses three main concerns: (1) most research focuses solely on battery electric vehicle users, neglecting plug-in hybrid (PHEV) and non-EV owners, thus failing to identify common preferences or transitional perceptions that could guide an inclusive development plan; (2) potential factors influencing charging station selection, such as the availability of nearby amenities and the role of information from social circles and user reviews, are often overlooked; and (3) used methods cannot reveal individual items' importance or uncover patterns between them as they often combine or transform the original items. To address these gaps, we conducted a survey experiment among 402 non-EV, PHEV and EV users and applied network analysis to capture their charging station selection decision-making processes. Our findings reveal that non-EV and PHEV users prioritize accessibility, whereas EV owners focus on the number of chargers. Furthermore, certain technical features, such as vehicle-to-grid capabilities, are commonly disregarded, while EV users place significant importance on engaging in amenities while charging. We also report an evolution of preferences, with users shifting their priorities on different types of information as they transition from non-EV and PHEV to EV ownership. Our results highlight the necessity for adaptive infrastructure strategies that consider the evolving preferences of different user groups to foster sustainable and equitable charging infrastructure development and broader adoption of EVs. 
    more » « less
  2. null (Ed.)
    Cities offer extensive facilities to enrich the quality of life by utilizing smart devices and sensors. The Internet of Things and smart sensors connect various city services with the inhabitants. The services should be convenient and accessible to all, especially pedestrians and people with visual impairment. However, the lack of information about service locations often limits their availability and use. To this end, we developed FinderX, a Bluetooth beacon-based system to search for the nearest services and amenities. FinderX identifies the locations of nearby amenities in real-time using the signal from attached beacons. The system does not require Internet or other communication infrastructure and can function where the GPS signal is inaccessible. To demonstrate the feasibility of FinderX, we set up a testbed and evaluated the system in an urban environment. We show that FinderX has adequate usability and feasibility and reduces the time to find the amenities by 18.98\% on average. We also demonstrate that Bluetooth beacons have lower horizontal error compared to GPS in micro-positioning (where semi-indoor or surrounding infrastructure limits signal accessibility), which motivates the use of Bluetooth beacons for such applications. 
    more » « less
  3. Natural disasters devastate property and infrastructure systems, impeding sustainable development. Low-income communities, due to economic, physical, and social disparities, face heightened exposure and vulnerability. These communities endure severe and long-lasting infrastructure damage, experiencing a fourfold increase in deaths per disaster and delayed recovery efforts. Consequently, they resort to constructing informal housing and infrastructure, worsening post-disaster challenges and vulnerabilities. This study aims to address post-disaster challenges in low-income communities by proposing two novel approaches that remain understudied despite their significant potential: (1) a short-term solution of origami temporary emergency housing for swift shelter post-disaster, enabling a return to routine activities while homes and infrastructure systems are being repaired or rebuilt; and (2) a long-term solution, including effective pedagogy, such as teaching methods and instructional tools, to educate and train low-income individuals to aid in sustainable post-disaster reconstruction while providing the added benefit of social mobility. To validate the feasibility of origami TEH and the need and effectiveness of the pedagogy, a survey among architecture, engineering, and construction experts in Puerto Rico, a region prone to natural disasters, was conducted. The results, analyzed using statistical measures including descriptive statistics and ordered probit regression analysis, emphasize the urgent need for sustainable TEH that can be quickly assembled and education for low-income individuals in construction trades. Implementing these solutions will significantly impact communities by addressing post-disaster challenges and promoting social mobility and job equity. 
    more » « less
  4. This paper proposes a computer vision-based workflow that analyses Google 360-degree street views to understand the quality of urban spaces regarding vegetation coverage and accessibility of urban amenities such as benches. Image segmentation methods were utilized to produce an annotated image with the amount of vegetation, sky and street coloration. Two deep learning models were used -- Monodepth2 for depth detection and YoloV5 for object detection -- to create a 360-degree diagram of vegetation and benches at a given location. The automated workflow allows non-expert users like planners, designers, and communities to analyze and evaluate urban environments with Google Street Views. The workflow consists of three components: (1) user interface for location selection; (2) vegetation analysis, bench detection and depth estimation; and (3) visualization of vegetation coverage and amenities. The analysis and visualization could inform better urban design outcomes. 
    more » « less
  5. Research on public charging station (PCS) selection has accumulated a large variety of variables that have been shown to affect charging behavior. We offer a human-centered framework to classify and integrate variables that have been described in the literature. Different from previous overviews, the framework focuses on the cognitive decision-making processes that are employed by human deciders. Every charging event includes a human decision that involves three dimensions: where to charge the vehicle (location), when to charge the vehicle (time), and for how long the vehicle is being charged (duration). The framework provides an overview of variables that have been studied in previous research and can be linked to these three dimensions. As a step to validate the framework, we asked 1,019 participants (including 667 owners of EVs or hybrid cars) how important each of 22 choice attributes would be for them when choosing a charging station. A factor analysis revealed the following six factors in descending order of perceived importance: costs, accessibility, time, past experience (self and other), amenities, and provider attributes. EV owners were also asked when and for how long they typically charge their vehicle. A factor analysis of the description of the time of charging confirmed a three-factor structure of range, finances, and habit. Results revealed systematic differences in the time and duration of charging between owners of hybrid cars and plug-in cars. Future research questions are discussed including the relevance of human-centered approaches for policies on charging station deployment and infrastructure planning. 
    more » « less