An official website of the United States government
Part of the 90-minute paper panel “Epistemic and ethical functions of categorizing and tool use in the agricultural sciences”. Organized by Catherine Kendig. Food Cultures and Social Justice, the 2025 Annual Conference of the Association for the Study of Food and Society/Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society (ASFS/AFHVS). Corvallis, Oregon State University.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on June 19, 2026
“Normative categorization of traits in food and agricultural breeding and testing practices"
Part of the 90-minute paper panel “Epistemic and ethical functions of categorizing and tool use in the agricultural sciences”. Organized by Catherine Kendig with Özlem Yilmaz Silverman and Paul Thompson. Food Cultures and Social Justice, the 2025 Annual Conference of the Association for the Study of Food and Society/Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society (ASFS/AFHVS). Corvallis, Oregon State University.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2240749
- PAR ID:
- 10632514
- Publisher / Repository:
- https://blogs.oregonstate.edu/2025asfsafhvs/
- Date Published:
- Edition / Version:
- https://blogs.oregonstate.edu/2025asfsafhvs/
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Part of symposium organized by Kate Millar on Examining the need for RRII and Ethics by Design Thinking in Agricultural and Food Research (with Rachel Ankeny, Raymond Antony, Trine Antonsen, Bernice Bovenkerk, Emily Buddle, Matthias Kaiser). European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics (EurSafe) Congress. Ede, The Netherlands 11 September 2024. https://www.eursafe2024.org/programmemore » « less
-
Abstract As the levels of plastic use in global society have increased, it has become crucial to regulate plastics of all sizes including both microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs). Here, the published literature on the current laws passed by the US Congress and regulations developed by various federal agencies such as the US Environmental Protection Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that could be used to regulate MPs and NPs have been reviewed and analyzed. Statutes such as the Clean Water Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and the Clean Air Act can all be used to address plastic pollution. These statutes have not been invoked for MP and NP waste in water or air. The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act provides guidance on how the FDA should evaluate plastics use in food, food packaging, cosmetics, drug packaging, and medical devices. The FDA has recommended that acceptable levels of ingestible contaminant from recycled plastic are less than 1.5 µg/person/day, which is 476 000 times less than the possible ingested daily dose. Plastic regulation is present at the state level. States have banned plastic bags, and several cities have banned plastic straws. California is the only state beginning to focus on monitoring MPs in drinking water. The future of MP regulation in the USA should use TSCA to test the safety of plastics. The other statutes need to include MPs in their definitions. For the FDA, MPs should be redefined as contaminants—allowing tolerances to be set for MPs in food and beverages. Through minor changes in how MPs are classified, it is possible to begin to use the current statutes to understand and begin to minimize the possible effects of MPs on human health and the environment. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2023;19:474–488. © 2022 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Sustainable provisioning of energy to society requires consideration of the nexus between food–energy–water (FEW) flows while meeting human needs and respecting nature's capacity to provide goods and services. In this work, we explore the FEW nexus of conventional and techno-ecologically synergistic (TES) systems by evaluating combinations of various technological, agricultural, and ecological strategies from the viewpoints of electricity generation, food production, life cycle water use, carbon footprint, nutrient runoff, corporate profitability, and societal well-being. We evaluate activities related to power generation (coal and gas extraction and use, transportation options, cooling technologies, solar panels, wind turbines), food production (farming with and without tillage), waste utilization (carbon dioxide capture and conversion to hydrocarbons, green hydrogen), and ecological restoration (forests and wetlands). Application of this framework to the Muskingum River watershed in Ohio, U.S.A. indicates that seeking synergies between human and natural systems can provide innovative solutions that improve the FEW nexus while making positive contributions to society with greater respect for nature's limits. We show that the conventional engineering approach of relying only on technological approaches for meeting sustainability objectives can have limited environmental and societal benefits while reducing profitability. In contrast, techno-ecologically synergistic design between agricultural systems and wetlands can reduce nutrient runoff with little compromise in other goals. Additional synergies between farming and photovoltaic systems along with the use of wetlands can further improve the FEW nexus while reducing CO 2 and nutrient emissions, with a relatively small compromise in corporate profitability. These results should motivate further work on innovative TES designs that can provide “win–win” solutions for meeting global energy needs in an environmentally and socially beneficial manner.more » « less
