skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


This content will become publicly available on March 1, 2026

Title: Improving the performance of SiO2 nanoparticles in portland-limestone cementitious systems using silica-limestone composites
Award ID(s):
2132022
PAR ID:
10633148
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Elsevier
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Cement and Concrete Composites
Volume:
157
Issue:
C
ISSN:
0958-9465
Page Range / eLocation ID:
105961
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Limestone microporosity is ubiquitous and extensively developed in most Phanerozoic limestones. From an economic perspective, microporosity is important because it contributes substantially to the carbonate pore system, which can host significant volumes of water and hydrocarbons. Therefore, determining the presence and distribution of limestone micropores is necessary for accurate hydrocarbon estimations, reservoir characterization, and fluid flow simulations. From an academic standpoint, microporosity is important because its genesis is intimately linked with the mineralogical stabilization of metastable sediments, a fundamental process in carbonate diagenesis. Many types of micropores contribute to what has been referred to as microporosity, but the vast majority is hosted among low-magnesium calcite (LMC) microcrystals that are present in limestone matrix and allochems. Geochemical, textural, and mineralogical data from natural settings and laboratory experiments indicate that LMC microcrystals are diagenetic in origin. More specifically, these data support a diagenetic model of mineralogical stabilization that involves dissolution of precursor sediments dominated by aragonite and high-magnesium calcite (HMC) minerals, and precipitation of LMC microcrystal cements. The stabilization process is inferred to take place in the meteoric, marine, and burial diagenetic realms. Although it has not been directly observed, carbon and oxygen isotopes, as well as trace element data suggest that LMC microcrystals form during burial diagenesis in marine-like fluids. Evidence suggests that porosity is not generated during this dissolution-precipitation process, but rather inherited from the precursor sediments. The final arrangement of the micropores in a limestone, however, depends on the precise diagenetic pathway. LMC microcrystals exhibit a range of microcrystalline textures that are classified on the basis of crystal morphology and size. The three main textural classes - granular (framework), fitted (mosaic), and clustered - have been recognized across a wide range of ages, depositional settings, burial depths, and precursor types, and are characterized by distinct petrophysical properties, such as porosity, permeability, and pore-throat size. Observations from modern sediments also support the hypothesis that LMC microcrystals develop from aragonite and HMC dominated lime mud. The origin of lime mud has been extensively studied but still highly debated. Of particular interest to the discussion of microporosity are proposed secular variations in the dominant mineralogy of carbonate sediments through the Phanerozoic. Microporous limestones comprised of LMC microcrystals are equally abundant during times of aragonite seas and calcite seas, which suggests that no special mineral precursor is required. Microporous textures are also observed in deep marine chalks where micropores are hosted between chalk constituents. Unlike shallow marine limestones, deep marine sediments start out as mostly LMC therefore mineralogical stabilization is not a significant process in chalk diagenesis. 
    more » « less
  2. Amziane, S; Merta, I; Page, J. (Ed.)
    Portland cement is one of the most used materials on earth. Its annual production is responsible for approximately 7% of global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. These emissions are primarily associated with (1) the burning of fossil fuels to heat cement kilns and (2) the release of CO2 during limestone calcination. One proposed strategy for CO2 reduction includes the use of functional limestone fillers, which reduce the amount of portland cement in concrete without compromising strength. This study investigated the effect of using renewable, CO2-storing, biogenic CaCO3 produced by E. huxleyi as limestone filler in portland limestone cements (PLCs). Biogenic CaCO3 was used to synthesize PLCs with 0, 5, 15, and 35% limestone replacement of portland cement. The results substantiate that the particle sizes of the biogenic CaCO3 were significantly smaller and the surface areas significantly larger than that of reagent grade CaCO3. X-ray diffraction indicated no differences in mineralogy between reagent-grade and biogenic CaCO3. The use of biogenic CaCO3 as a limestone filler led to (i) increased water demand at the higher replacements, which was countered by using a superplasticizer, and (ii) enhanced nucleation during cement hydration, as measured by isothermal conduction calorimetry. The 7-day compressive strengths of the PLC pastes were measured using mechanical testing. Enhanced nucleation effects were observed for PLC samples containing biogenic CaCO3. 7-day compressive strength of the PLCs produced using biogenic CaCO3 were also enhanced compared to PLCs produced using reagent-grade CaCO3 due to the nucleation effect. This study illustrates an opportunity for using CO2-storing, biogenic CaCO3 to enhance mechanical properties and CO2 storage in PLCs containing biologically architected CaCO3. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract Bituminous limestone of the Ediacaran Shibantan Member of the Dengying Formation (551–539 Ma) in the Yangtze Gorges area contains a rare carbonate-hosted Ediacara-type macrofossil assemblage. This assemblage is dominated by the tubular fossil Wutubus Chen et al., 2014 and discoidal fossils, e.g., Hiemalora Fedonkin, 1982 and Aspidella Billings, 1872, but frondose organisms such as Charnia Ford, 1958, Rangea Gürich, 1929, and Arborea Glaessner and Wade, 1966 are also present. Herein, we report four species of Arborea from the Shibantan assemblage, including the type species Arborea arborea (Glaessner in Glaessner and Daily, 1959) Glaessner and Wade, 1966, Arborea denticulata new species, and two unnamed species, Arborea sp. A and Arborea sp. B. Arborea arborea is the most abundant frond in the Shibantan assemblage. Arborea denticulata n. sp. resembles Arborea arborea in general morphology but differs in its fewer primary branches and lower length/width ratio of primary branches. Arborea sp. A and Arborea sp. B are fronds with a Hiemalora -type basal attachment. Sealing by microbial mats and authigenic cementation may have played an important role in the preservation of Arborea in the Shibantan assemblage. The Shibantan material of Arborea extends the stratigraphic, ecological, and taphonomic ranges of this genus. UUID: http://zoobank.org/554f21da-5f09-4891-9deb-cbc00c41e5f1 
    more » « less