skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: The Role of Meiotic Drive in Chromosome Number Disparity Between Heterosporous and Homosporous Plants
In vascular plants, heterosporous lineages typically have fewer chromosomes than homosporous lineages. The underlying mechanism causing this disparity has been debated for over half a century. Although reproductive mode has been identified as critical to these patterns, the symmetry of meiosis during sporogenesis has been overlooked as a potential cause of the difference in chromosome numbers. In most heterosporous plants, meiosis during megasporogenesis is asymmetric, meaning one of the four meiotic products survives to become the egg. Comparatively, meiosis is symmetric in homosporous megasporogenesis and all meiotic products survive. The symmetry of meiosis is important because asymmetric meiosis enables meiotic drive and associated genomic changes, while symmetric meiosis cannot lead to meiotic drive. Meiotic drive is a deviation from Mendelian inheritance where genetic elements are preferentially inherited by the surviving egg cell, and can profoundly impact chromosome (and genome) size, structure, and number. Here we review how meiotic drive impacts chromosome number evolution in heterosporous plants, how the lack of meiotic drive in homosporous plants impacts their genomes, and explore future approaches to understand the role of meiotic drive on chromosome number across land plants.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2209073
PAR ID:
10639427
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  
Publisher / Repository:
Molecular Ecology
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Molecular Ecology
ISSN:
0962-1083
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract BackgroundMeiosis is a specialized cell division that underpins sexual reproduction in most eukaryotes. During meiosis, interhomolog meiotic recombination facilitates accurate chromosome segregation and generates genetic diversity by shuffling parental alleles in the gametes. The frequency of meiotic recombination inArabidopsishas a U-shaped curve in response to environmental temperature, and is dependent on the Type I, crossover (CO) interference-sensitive pathway. The mechanisms that modulate recombination frequency in response to temperature are not yet known. ResultsIn this study, we compare the transcriptomes of thermally-stressed meiotic-stage anthers frommsh4andmus81mutants that mediate the Type I and Type II meiotic recombination pathways, respectively. We show that heat stress reduces the number of expressed genes regardless of genotype. In addition,msh4mutants have a distinct gene expression pattern compared tomus81and wild type controls. Interestingly,ASY1,which encodes a HORMA domain protein that is a component of meiotic chromosome axes, is up-regulated in wild type andmus81but not inmsh4. In addition,SDSthe meiosis-specific cyclin-like gene,DMC1the meiosis-specific recombinase,SYN1/REC8the meiosis-specific cohesion complex component, andSWI1which functions in meiotic sister chromatid cohesion are up-regulated in all three genotypes. We also characterize 51 novel, previously unannotated transcripts, and show that their promoter regions are associated with A-rich meiotic recombination hotspot motifs. ConclusionsOur transcriptomic analysis ofmsh4andmus81mutants enhances our understanding of how the Type I and Type II meiotic CO pathway respond to environmental temperature stress and might provide a strategy to manipulate recombination levels in plants. 
    more » « less
  2. Arkhipova, Irina (Ed.)
    Abstract Meiotic drivers are selfish genetic elements that gain transmission advantages by distorting equal, Mendelian segregation. For decades, biologists have considered meiotic drivers as interesting, albeit esoteric, case studies. It is now clear, however, that meiotic drive is more common and phylogenetically widespread than previously supposed. Indeed, intensive study of a few well-known cases has begun to reveal the evolutionary genomic consequences of meiotic drive. We argue here that many features of genome evolution, content, and organization that are seemingly inexplicable by organismal adaptation or nearly neutral processes are instead best accounted for by recurrent histories of meiotic drive. We review how meiotic drive can affect the evolution of sequences, gene copy numbers, genes with functions in meiosis and gametogenesis, signatures of “selection”, chromosome rearrangements, and karyotype evolution. We also explore the interactions of meiotic drive elements with other classes of selfish genetic elements, including satellite DNAs, transposable elements, and with the endogenous host genes involved in drive suppression. Finally, we argue that some aspects of drive-mediated genome evolution are now sufficiently well established that we might reverse the direction of discovery— rather than ask how drive affects genome evolution, we can use genome data to discover new putative drive elements. 
    more » « less
  3. Freitag, M (Ed.)
    Abstract Spore killers are meiotic drive elements that can block the development of sexual spores in fungi. In the maize ear rot and mycotoxin-producing fungus Fusarium verticillioides, a spore killer called SkK has been mapped to a 102-kb interval of chromosome V. Here, we show that a gene within this interval, SKC1, is required for SkK-mediated spore killing and meiotic drive. We also demonstrate that SKC1 is associated with at least 4 transcripts, 2 sense (sense-SKC1a and sense-SKC1b) and 2 antisense (antisense-SKC1a and antisense-SKC1b). Both antisense SKC1 transcripts lack obvious protein-coding sequences and thus appear to be noncoding RNAs. In contrast, sense-SKC1a is a protein-coding transcript that undergoes A-to-I editing to sense-SKC1b in sexual tissue. Translation of sense-SKC1a produces a 70-amino-acid protein (Skc1a), whereas the translation of sense-SKC1b produces an 84-amino-acid protein (Skc1b). Heterologous expression analysis of SKC1 transcripts shows that sense-SKC1a also undergoes A-to-I editing to sense-SKC1b during the Neurospora crassa sexual cycle. Site-directed mutagenesis studies indicate that Skc1b is responsible for spore killing in Fusarium verticillioides and that it induces most meiotic cells to die in Neurospora crassa. Finally, we report that SKC1 homologs are present in over 20 Fusarium species. Overall, our results demonstrate that fungal meiotic drive elements like SKC1 can influence the outcome of meiosis by hijacking a cell’s A-to-I editing machinery and that the involvement of A-to-I editing in a fungal meiotic drive system does not preclude its horizontal transfer to a distantly related species. 
    more » « less
  4. Smolka, M (Ed.)
    Abstract In meiosis, one round of DNA replication followed by two rounds of chromosome segregation halves the ploidy of the original cell. Accurate chromosome segregation in meiosis I depends on recombination between homologous chromosomes. Sister centromeres attach to the same spindle pole in this division and only segregate in meiosis II. We used budding yeast to select for mutations that produced viable spores in the absence of recombination. The most frequent mutations inactivated CLB4, which encodes one of four B-type cyclins. In two wild yeast isolates, Y55 and SK1, but not the W303 laboratory strain, deleting CLB4 causes premature sister centromere separation and segregation in meiosis I and frequent termination of meiosis after a single division, demonstrating a novel role for Clb4 in meiotic chromosome dynamics and meiotic progression. This role depends on the genetic background since meiosis in W303 is largely independent of CLB4. 
    more » « less
  5. A hallmark of meiosis is pairing of homologous chromosomes, an event that ensures proper segregation into the gametes. Homology pairing is crucial to the formation of normal gametes, the maintenance of genomic integrity, and avoidance of aneuploidy. However, chromosomes are not completely homologous. Here we discuss two notable exceptions to homology: the mammalian sex chromosomes and centromeres. In themselves, these exceptions illustrate meiotic adaptations that both ensure correct chromosome segregation and present evolutionary opportunities. More broadly, such examples of non-homology provide a window for viewing normal mechanisms of meiotic pairing and chromosome modifications. Current analyses of mammalian meiotic chromosome dynamics suggest that the basis for the initial recognition of homology early in meiosis may be based in epigenetic chromatin modifications. Chromatin units may both form pairing sites and provide the modifications that allow non-homologous sequences to be tolerated. Despite recent research progress, we have yet to understand why some non-homologies are tolerated, while others lead to aneuploidy. Understanding how genomes evolve strategies to subvert the usual rules of meiosis will benefit from studies focused on the identification and characterization of meiosis in species with recently acquired non-homology. Looking forward, we are now armed with technologies and tools suited to precisely measure the extent of nonhomology across mammalian chromosomes and to probe the molecular and biophysical steps required for the initiation of homologous chromosome recognition and pairing. These goals are important for elucidating an essential mechanism of meiosis and ultimately for advancing the clinical diagnosis of gametic and embryo aneuploidy. 
    more » « less