This content will become publicly available on January 31, 2026
Title: Building bridges, breaking barriers: Exploring the dynamics and key factors shaping computer science education pathways in teacher preparation
This study explored the dynamics and key factors influencing the development of computer science education (CSEd) pathways in teacher preparation at 10 higher education institutions in the United States. Through cross-case analysis, the findings highlighted that personal commitment and leadership from CSEd champions played a key role in initiating and maintaining CSEd efforts. Other factors acted as a double-edged sword, serving as enablers in some cases and barriers in others. These factors include funding sustainability, stakeholder buy-in, and state-level policies, which could support or complicate CSEd implementation depending on their flexibility and alignment with institutional needs. The study concluded that successful CSEd pathway development requires multifaceted, holistic consideration, balancing leadership, institutional support, and systemic alignment. These insights offered valuable guidance for teacher educators, policymakers, and institutions aiming to expand CS teacher capacity for equitable K–12 computing education. more »« less
Jaeger, E.; McKayle, C.; Engerman, K.; Boncana, M.; Joseph, C.; Askew, K.
(, The journal of Negro education)
Taylor, O.; Campone, F.; Retland, N.
(Ed.)
Historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs) are noted for their success in broadening participation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). A multiple case study approach was used to identify institutional and leadership characteristics that may drive the success of small HBCUs in broadening participation in STEM. Data on 15 HBCUs were obtained from websites, including institutional websites, and the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). Factors common to many institutions included external STEM education funding, STEM-/research-focused missions, commitment of leaders to STEM education, partnerships to support STEM education, STEM faculty professional development, and STEM student support strategies. These characteristics also predicted the percentage of STEM graduates. Implications for future research include illuminating the pathways by which institutional and leadership factors influence student outcomes.
Santo, Rafi; DeLyser, Leigh Ann; Ahn, June; Pellicone, Anthony; Aguiar, Julia; Wortel-London, Stephanie
(, 2019 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing and Technology (RESPECT))
null
(Ed.)
Equity is arguably an agreed upon value within the Computer Science education (CSed) community, and perhaps even more so within efforts to universalize access to CSed within K12 settings through emerging `CS for All' initiatives. However, stakeholders often mean different things when referring to equity, with important implications for what CS teaching and learning looks like in schools. In this paper, we explore the question of how K12 school district actors' conceptualizations of equity manifest within their planning and implementation of district-wide CSed initiatives. Based on a research-practice partnership aimed at supporting and researching district-wide CSed initiatives, data presented - interviews with district faculty, district planning documents, meeting transcripts and field observations - were drawn from five participating school districts as they made decisions and enacted activities over 11 months in areas including vision-setting, curriculum, professional development, leadership efforts and use of formative data about implementation. Analyzing these data through equity frameworks found in CSed literature, we highlight three distinct but interconnected ways that district actors conceptualized equity within their CSed initiatives: (1) equity in who Computer Science is for, (2) equity in how Computer Science is taught, and (3) equity in what Computer Science is taught. Data show that these varied conceptualizations resulted in different kinds of decisions about CSed in districts. We discuss the implications of these findings in terms of their relevance to equity-oriented CS education researchers, and what lessons they hold for policy-makers and education leaders engaged in their own efforts to support equitable computer science education.
Lunn, Stephanie; Samary, Maíra Marques; Hambrusch, Susanne; Yadav, Aman
(, ACM Transactions on Computing Education)
Computer science education (CSEd) is a growing interdisciplinary area that continues to gain momentum from students, researchers, and educators. Yet, there are few formal programs or degree options for students interested in pursuing graduate work in CSEd. This article explores the existing state of CSEd in the United States (U.S.) through semi-structured interviews with ( n = 15) faculty engaged in CSEd research. Thematic coding of the transcripts revealed the complexities involved in the development of formal programs, the distinct considerations for faculty, and the value of having strong ties to both computer science and education. The themes described positive aspects of support and cohesion within the larger community and opportunities to expand knowledge across fields. Applying Cornell and Parker’s principles of interdisciplinary science to the field of CSEd, we provide recommendations for ways forward and discuss the potential impact on institutional structures, research capacity, individual and group identities, and teaching and learning. The findings from this investigation not only inform on the present state of CSEd in the U.S., but also offer guidance for CSEd-focused graduate programs.
Abstract BackgroundTeacher turnover is a dire and chronic problem for many education systems across the globe. According to UNESCO, 70% of teachers will be replaced by 2030. This study investigates the relationship between the retention of science and mathematics teachers and factors related to human, social, structural, and positive psychological capital—a four-capital teacher retention model. More specifically, this study explores how teaching self-efficacy, leadership engagement, teacher-school fit, diversity beliefs, community connections, and professional social network characteristics (e.g., size, bridging, proximity, reach) relate to teacher retention. Additionally, potential differences in retention and the aforementioned factors related to the four-capital model between Master Teaching Fellows (MTFs) and their peers (non-MTFs) with similar human capital (demographics and experience) are explored in this study. Participants were K-12 science and mathematics teachers (85 MTFs and 82 non-MTFs) from six different regions across the U.S. MTFs participated in one of seven long-term (5–6 years) Robert Noyce Master Teaching Fellowship Programs funded by the National Science Foundation. ResultsLeadership engagement was positively associated with shifting (from teaching to a formal leadership position). Teacher-school fit was negatively associated with leaving. For secondary teachers, teaching self-efficacy was positively associated with shifting to a leadership position. Leadership network size, bridging, and geographic proximity variables were positively related to shifting when compared to staying as classroom teachers. Teaching network bridging and leadership network bridging were positively related to leavers when compared to stayers. MTF shifters were likely to shift earlier in their careers than non-MTFs. Lastly, MTFs had higher self-efficacy, geographically larger teaching networks and leadership networks, and more contacts and bridging roles in their leadership networks than non-MTFs. ConclusionFindings provide support for teacher leadership programs in promoting leadership roles and responsibilities for STEM teachers and retaining teachers in STEM education either in the classroom or in administrative roles. These findings suggest that school administrators may also play a key role in encouraging teachers to engage in leadership activities and have a broader impact on public education by, for example, adopting a hybrid model of leadership roles that involves classroom teaching.
Ekmekci, A; Aqazade, M; Papakonstantinou, A; Orcan, B; Catanese, J; Callard, C; Cerosaletti, C; Daley, M; Rushton, G; Reid, J; et al
(, Proceedings of 2022 Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference)
Langran, E
(Ed.)
Teacher turnover in science and mathematics is a significant and consistent challenge for K-12 education in the U.S. This paper provides: (a) an investigation of the relationship between teacher retention and several social and motivational factors; and (b) a comparison of Master Teaching Fellows (MTF) and non-MTF teachers in terms of their retention and social and motivational factors. Teachers are classified into three retention categories: (a) stayers, (b) shifters, and (c) leavers. Social and motivational factors included teaching self-efficacy, diversity dispositions, leadership skills, principal autonomy support, teacher-school fit (adapted from person-organization fit literature), and social networks related to teaching and education. Study 1 included about 250 science and math teachers from the gulf coast region of Texas. Study 2 included 167 science and math teachers across the country. Teachers completed a survey in the summer and fall of 2021. For study 1, multinomial logistics regression analyses indicate: (a) leavers have significantly higher levels of self-efficacy; and (b) shifters have significantly higher levels of leadership skills and lower levels of teacher-school fit. The second study findings indicate: (a) MTFs’ teacher leadership network and teaching self-efficacy are significantly greater than that of non-MTFs’; and (b) MTFs significantly tend to shift to a leadership position than non-MTFs do.
Liao, Y-C, Karlin, M, Margulieux, L E, and Calandra, B. Building bridges, breaking barriers: Exploring the dynamics and key factors shaping computer science education pathways in teacher preparation. Retrieved from https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10641663. Journal of technology and teacher education 33.
Liao, Y-C, Karlin, M, Margulieux, L E, & Calandra, B. Building bridges, breaking barriers: Exploring the dynamics and key factors shaping computer science education pathways in teacher preparation. Journal of technology and teacher education, 33 (). Retrieved from https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10641663.
Liao, Y-C, Karlin, M, Margulieux, L E, and Calandra, B.
"Building bridges, breaking barriers: Exploring the dynamics and key factors shaping computer science education pathways in teacher preparation". Journal of technology and teacher education 33 (). Country unknown/Code not available: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10641663.
@article{osti_10641663,
place = {Country unknown/Code not available},
title = {Building bridges, breaking barriers: Exploring the dynamics and key factors shaping computer science education pathways in teacher preparation},
url = {https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10641663},
abstractNote = {This study explored the dynamics and key factors influencing the development of computer science education (CSEd) pathways in teacher preparation at 10 higher education institutions in the United States. Through cross-case analysis, the findings highlighted that personal commitment and leadership from CSEd champions played a key role in initiating and maintaining CSEd efforts. Other factors acted as a double-edged sword, serving as enablers in some cases and barriers in others. These factors include funding sustainability, stakeholder buy-in, and state-level policies, which could support or complicate CSEd implementation depending on their flexibility and alignment with institutional needs. The study concluded that successful CSEd pathway development requires multifaceted, holistic consideration, balancing leadership, institutional support, and systemic alignment. These insights offered valuable guidance for teacher educators, policymakers, and institutions aiming to expand CS teacher capacity for equitable K–12 computing education.},
journal = {Journal of technology and teacher education},
volume = {33},
publisher = {Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education},
author = {Liao, Y-C and Karlin, M and Margulieux, L E and Calandra, B},
}
Warning: Leaving National Science Foundation Website
You are now leaving the National Science Foundation website to go to a non-government website.
Website:
NSF takes no responsibility for and exercises no control over the views expressed or the accuracy of
the information contained on this site. Also be aware that NSF's privacy policy does not apply to this site.