More Like this

1. Multiple factors explain species‐specific regeneration of mangrove seedlings and saplings after a major hurricane

   https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70298  

   Restrepo, Veronica_B; Castañeda‐Moya, Edward; Kominoski, John_S; Solohin, Elena (June 2025, Ecosphere)

   Abstract Mangroves play a crucial role in mitigating hurricane impacts in coastal ecosystems, and their adaptive traits enable regeneration and forest recovery following these disturbances. Yet, how species‐specific regeneration varies across life stages and interacts with environmental conditions is poorly understood. We quantified regeneration rates of three dominant species of mangrove seedlings and saplings (Avicennia germinans,Laguncularia racemosa, andRhizophora mangle) recovering from a major hurricane. We selected forests with varying light availability and phosphorus (P) gradients in the Everglades (Florida, USA). From 2020 to 2022, we measured biannual stem elongation, height, and density of seedlings and saplings, and collected porewater variables (salinity, sulfide, and inorganic nutrients) and continuous light intensity to assess species‐specific drivers of regeneration. Species‐specific growth rates, total height, and density varied across sites, driven by differences in porewater P and light. Growth rates ofR. mangleseedlings and bothR. mangleandL. racemosasaplings were influenced by light, whileA. germinansgrowth rates were unaffected. OnlyR. mangleandL. racemosasaplings were influenced by porewater P, while growth of both seedlings and saplings was unaffected by porewater salinity and sulfide. Mangrove regeneration post‐disturbance is explained by spatial differences in subsidies and stressors and the composition of species and life stages, underscoring complex regeneration strategies in mixed‐species forests. 

   more » « less
2. Mangrove Litterfall from the Shark River Slough and Taylor Slough, Everglades National Park (FCE), South Florida, USA, January 2001 - ongoing

   https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/f08c48dcdc89e4a331dd9250286325d5  

   Castañeda-Moya, Edward; Kominoski, John; Rivera-Monroy, Victor; Twilley, Robert; Reisa, Caitlin (January 2025, Environmental Data Initiative)

   Monthly litterfall data is being collected in two mangrove-dominated regions (Shark River and Taylor Slough) in South Florida. Three sites (SRS4, SRS5, SRS6) in the Shark River region and one site (TS/Ph8) in the Joe Bay area region were used to characterize patterns of litterfall production. At each mangrove site 10 litter baskets (0.5 x 0.5 m) were placed in two 20 x 20 m plots (five baskets per plot). Data have been collected since January 2001. Statistical analysis is being performed. See also Shark River mangrove litterfall carbon and nutrients data package knb-lter-fce.1266 (https://portal.edirepository.org/nis/mapbrowse?scope=knb-lter-fce&identifier=1266). 

   more » « less
3. AmeriFlux AmeriFlux US-Skr Shark River Slough (Tower SRS-6) Everglades

   https://doi.org/10.17190/AMF/1246105  

   Fuentes, Jose; Malone, Sparkle; Troxler, Tiffany (January 2024, AmeriFlux; Florida International University; Pennsylvania State University; Yale University)

   This is the AmeriFlux version of the carbon flux data for the site US-Skr Shark River Slough (Tower SRS-6) Everglades. Site Description - The Florida Everglades Shark River Slough Mangrove Forest site is located along the Shark River in the western region of Everglades National Park. Also referred to as site SRS6 of the Florida Coastal Everglades LTER program, freshwater in the mangrove riverine floods the forest floor under a meter of water twice per day. Transgressive discharge of freshwater from the Shark river follows annual rainfall distributions between the wet and dry seasons. Hurricane Wilma struck the site in October of 2005 causing significant damage. The tower was offline until the following October in order to continue temporally consistent measurements. In post-hurricane conditions, ecosystem respiration rates and solar irradiance transfer increased. 2007- 2008 measurements indicate that these factors led to an decline in both annual -NEE and daily NEE from pre-hurricane conditions in 2004-2005. 

   more » « less
4. Sugar Maple Regeneration in New Hampshire, 2019-2023

   https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/5075830b44715134e1c45c590aa1ccad  

   Cleavitt, Natalie L (January 2024, Environmental Data Initiative)

   Overview: These data sets are the culmination of a five-year community science project done in collaboration with the Society for Protection of NH Forests. Co-authors on the resulting paper were: Carrie Deegan, Sarah Thorne, Ana Suppé, Kimberly L. Colson and Wanda Rice. Funding was provided by: Engaged Research Grant from the Einhorn Center for Community Engagement at Cornell University 2019 - 2023; Public Engagement with Science Grant (NSF grant #1713204) subcontract from Hubbard Brook Research Foundation; USDA Climate Hub; NSF-REU supplement under the HBR LTER (NSF grant #1637685) in 2021 and 2022 and HBR LTER in 2023 (NSF grant #2224545 ). Undergraduate students who helped on the project: Katie Sims, Alex Ding, Esmée deCortie, Sage Wentzell-Brehme, Colin Craig, Linda Mahecha, Roxy Moore. Community volunteers who contributed to field data collection and project meetings: Paul Doscher, Dave Heuss, Kim Sharp, Chris Brown, Tim Kendrick, Dan Poor, Rickey Poor, and Blaine Kopp. The study was conducted in four mature forest stands with a notable sugar maple component owned and managed by the Society for Protection of New Hampshire Forests (Forest Society) and spanning most of the latitudinal gradient in the state. Plots were established in autumn of 2018. In general, 12 plot locations were established for each of the four forest stands. Plots are spatially-uniform and placed as close to a 100 m grid system as possible with the restriction that the plot had to include three canopy sugar maple trees. The plots are 0.05 hectares or 500 m2 in size measured in a 12.62 m radius circular plot. Marked_sdlg_site_EDI: This data set contains survival, leaf area and leaf damage for 1191 sugar maple seedlings at four sites in New Hampshire. The sugar maple seedlings were two years old at the time of marking in 2019 and were from the 2017 mast year. The study followed the seedlings on 12 plots per site for 5 years (2019-2023). The data file also contains plot and site variables for topography, soil chemistry and tree density and sugar maple dominance. Some of the main findings from the study were the importance of site, initial leaf area and leaf damage to seedling survival. Litter_coll_ForestSoc_2yr: Leaves and seeds were collected from half of the plots (N=6) per site using three collectors. Count and dry weight were obtained for the leaves and counts for any seeds. This data set contains the main autumn collection data for 2019 and 2020. The were 20 tree species included over the four sites. There was a pattern of greater productivity in the southern site (greatest number of leaves) and decreased productivity in the northern site (lowest dry mass of leaves). Seed production for sugar maple was higher in 2019. Sweep_ForestSoc: Sapling layers were generally open with only 281 saplings from all plots. Kauffmann had the densest and most diverse sapling layer. The saplings were only measured once in 2019. Tagged_trees_ForestSoc: The data set includes growth (4 year) and vigor data (every other year) for 1335 trees in four study sites in New Hampshire. The data set includes data for 16 tree species tagged in 2019 and assessed in 2021 and 2023. At all sites, sugar maple growth was slower than average tree growth and mortality for sugar maple was higher than the average tree. This data set does not include data for trees that died during the study and therefore do not have growth data (96 trees). Common_garden_sdlgs: This data set includes harvest data for 50 sugar maple seedlings grown in a common garden experiment with soil from the four study sites taken from two microsites: sugar maple dominated and dominated by other species. The experimental setup had two controls. One control was the live soil from the site where the seedlings were obtained (native soil control). A second control contained a mix of sugar maple soil from the four sites that had been sterilized (pathogen free control). The experiment did not demonstrate a microsite difference for seedling growth but rather sites differed with the most nutrient rich soil resulting in larger seedlings. Overall, the experiment did not support a significant role of soil pathogens in explaining seedling survival differences between sites. ACSA_samaras_2019: This data table gives counts and condition of the samaras collected at the four study sites in autumn 2019, which represented the largest seed year during the study time. This data is useful for comparing differences in pre-dispersal damage to the seeds and seed production across sites. 2020_germinant_counts: This data table gives counts of newly germinated sugar maple seedlings at the plots with collectors (odd numbered plots). Sites were visited 14-18 May 2020. These data are used for comparing initial seedling densities across sites and the number of seedlings compared to the number of seeds for those plots, which gives an idea of post-dispersal survival. 

   more » « less
5. Active restoration increases tree species richness and recruitment of large‐seeded taxa after 16–18 years

   https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.3053  

   Schubert, Spencer_C; Zahawi, Rakan_A; Oviedo‐Brenes, Federico; Rosales, Juan_Abel; Holl, Karen_D (November 2024, Ecological Applications)

   Abstract Tropical forest restoration presents a potential lifeline to mitigate climate change and biodiversity crises in the Anthropocene. Yet, the extent to which human interventions, such as tree planting, accelerate the recovery of mature functioning ecosystems or redirect successional trajectories toward novel states remains uncertain due to a lack of long‐term experiments. In 2004–2006, we established three 0.25‐ha plots at 10 sites in southern Costa Rica to test three forest restoration approaches: natural regeneration (no planting), applied nucleation (planting in patches), and plantation (full planting). In a comprehensive survey after 16–18 years of recovery, we censused >80,000 seedlings, saplings, and trees from at least 255 species across 26 restoration plots (nine natural regeneration, nine applied nucleation, eight plantation) and six adjacent reference forests to evaluate treatment effects on recruitment patterns and community composition. Both applied nucleation and plantation treatments resulted in significantly elevated seedling and sapling establishment and more predictable community composition compared with natural regeneration. Similarity of vegetation composition to reference forest tended to scale positively with treatment planting intensity. Later‐successional species with seeds ≥5 mm had significantly greater seedling and sapling abundance in the two planted treatments, and plantation showed similar recruitment densities of large‐seeded (≥10 mm) species to reference forest. Plantation tended toward a lower abundance of early‐successional recruits than applied nucleation. Trees (≥5 cm dbh) in all restoration treatments continued to be dominated by a few early‐successional species and originally transplanted individuals. Seedling recruits of planted taxa were more abundant in applied nucleation than the other treatments though few transitioned into the sapling layer. Overall, our findings show that active tree planting accelerates the establishment of later‐successional trees compared with natural regeneration after nearly two decades. While the apparent advantages of higher density tree planting on dispersal and understory establishment of larger seeded, later‐successional species recruitment is notable, more time is needed to assess whether these differences will persist and transition to the more rapid development of a mature later‐successional canopy. Our results underscore the need for ecological restoration planning and monitoring that targets biodiversity recovery over multiple decades. 

   more » « less