An official website of the United States government
Abstract Coupled simulations of surface and variably saturated subsurface flow, termed integrated hydrologic models (IHMs), can provide powerful insights into the complex dynamics of watersheds. The system of governing equations solved by an IHM is non‐linear, making them a significant computational burden and challenging to accurately parameterize. Consequently, a large fraction of the IHM studies to date have been “numerical hypothesis testing” studies, but, as parallel computing continues to improve, IHMs are approaching the point where they might also be useful as predictive tools. For this to become reality, the predictive uncertainty of such highly parameterized simulations must be considered. However, uncertainty is seldom considered in the IHM literature, likely due to the long runtimes of the complex simulations. The questions considered herein are how much uncertainty is there in an IHM for a common watershed simulation scenario, and how likely is it that any one realization of a system will give the same relative change as any other due to a perturbation in recharge? A stochastic ensemble of 250 permeability field realizations was used to show that uncertainty in a high‐mountain headwaters systems is dominated by the subsurface. Recharge perturbation scenarios echo these results, but the uncertainty ofchangesin streamflow or groundwater pressure heads were significantly smaller than the uncertainty in their base‐case values. The main finding is that IHMs do provide confident, predictive estimates ofrelativechanges in watersheds, even when uncertainty in specific simulation outputs may be high.
more »
« less
Impacts of Uncertain Permeability Fields on the Transient Hydrologic Response in Coupled Surface‐Subsurface Simulations of a Headwaters Catchment
Abstract Modern integrated hydrologic models (IHMs) are powerful tools for investigating coupled hydrologic system dynamics. The tradeoff for this realism is a high computational burden and large numbers of parameters in each cell, few of which can be specified with a high degree of confidence. These factors combined make uncertainty quantification (UQ) a problem for IHM‐based simulations, yet without rigorous UQ, it is not clear how much confidence can be placed on conclusions made with IHMs. Previous work evaluated steady‐state cases where the permeability field was a random variable, and a logical continuation is to consider transient conditions. This work assesses the confidence of an IHM representation of a first‐order basin in central Idaho, USA, using an ensemble of 250 permeability realizations under three different recharge forcing signals. The results show that surface water is simulated with high confidence across all the permeability realizations, but the groundwater system and changes to it have lower confidence. However, uncertainty in changes to the groundwater system decrease with time since an increase in the recharge, meaning that the farther one gets from a “peak” in the flow (of any size) the more confident one can be in the response (i.e., smaller inter‐quartile range). The ensemble was also used to assess how many realizations were needed to capture expected behaviors of the ensemble and their range of variability. Unsurprisingly, groundwater requires larger ensembles than surface flows, but the size of the ensembles necessary for convergence were smaller than initially expected.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2049687
- PAR ID:
- 10646650
- Publisher / Repository:
- DOI PREFIX: 10.1029
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Water Resources Research
- Volume:
- 61
- Issue:
- 10
- ISSN:
- 0043-1397
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract. Mountainous regions act as the water towers of the worldby producing streamflow and groundwater recharge, a function that isparticularly important in semiarid regions. Quantifying rates of mountainsystem recharge is difficult, and hydrologic models offer a method toestimate recharge over large scales. These recharge estimates are prone touncertainty from various sources including model structure and parameters.The quality of meteorological forcing datasets, particularly in mountainousregions, is a large source of uncertainty that is often neglected ingroundwater investigations. In this contribution, we quantify the impact ofuncertainty in both precipitation and air temperature forcing datasets onthe simulated groundwater recharge in the mountainous watershed of theKaweah River in California, USA. We make use of the integrated surface water–groundwater model, ParFlow.CLM, and several gridded datasets commonly usedin hydrologic studies, downscaled NLDAS-2, PRISM, Daymet, Gridmet, andTopoWx. Simulations indicate that, across all forcing datasets, mountain front recharge is an important component of the water budget in themountainous watershed, accounting for 9 %–72 % of the annual precipitation and ∼90 % of the total mountain system recharge to theadjacent Central Valley aquifer. The uncertainty in gridded air temperatureor precipitation datasets, when assessed individually, results in similarranges of uncertainty in the simulated water budget. Variations in simulatedrecharge to changes in precipitation (elasticities) and air temperature(sensitivities) are larger than 1 % change in recharge per 1 % change inprecipitation or 1 ∘C change in temperature. The total volume ofsnowmelt is the primary factor creating the high water budget sensitivity, and snowmelt volume is influenced by both precipitation and air temperatureforcings. The combined effect of uncertainty in air temperature andprecipitation on recharge is additive and results in uncertainty levels roughly equal to the sum of the individual uncertainties depending on thehydroclimatic condition of the watershed. Mountain system recharge pathwaysincluding mountain block recharge, mountain aquifer recharge, and mountainfront recharge are less sensitive to changes in air temperature than changesin precipitation. Mountain front and mountain block recharge are moresensitive to changes in precipitation than other recharge pathways. Themagnitude of uncertainty in the simulated water budget reflects theimportance of developing high-quality meteorological forcing datasets in mountainous regions.more » « less
-
Abstract Mountain System Recharge processes are significant natural recharge pathways in many arid and semi‐arid mountainous regions. However, Mountain System Recharge processes are often poorly understood and characterized in hydrologic models. Mountains are the primary water supply source to valley aquifers via lateral groundwater flow from the mountain block (Mountain Block Recharge) and focused recharge from mountain streams contributing to focused Mountain Front Recharge at the piedmont zone. Here, we present a multi‐tool isogeochemical approach to characterize mountain flow paths and Mountain System Recharge in the northern Tulare Basin, California. We used groundwater chemistry data to delineate hydrochemical facies and explain the chemical evolution of groundwater from the Sierra Nevada to the Central Valley aquifer. Stable isotopes and radiogenic groundwater tracers validated Mountain System Recharge processes by differentiating focused from diffuse recharge, and estimating apparent groundwater age, respectively. Novel application of End‐Member Mixing Analysis using conservative chemical components revealed three Mountain System Recharge end‐members: (a) evaporated Ca‐HCO3water type associated with focused Mountain Front Recharge, (b) non‐evaporated Ca‐HCO3and Na‐HCO3water types with short residence times associated with shallow Mountain Block Recharge, and (c) Na‐HCO3groundwater type with long residence time associated with deep Mountain Block Recharge. We quantified the contribution of each Mountain System Recharge process to the valley aquifer by calculating mixing ratios. Our results show that deep Mountain Block Recharge is a significant recharge component, representing 31%–53% of the valley groundwater. Greater hydraulic connectivity between the Sierra Nevada and Central Valley has significant implications for parameterizing groundwater flow models. Our framework is useful for understanding Mountain System Recharge processes in other snow‐dominated mountain watersheds.more » « less
-
Shallow groundwater in the Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) is recharged predominantly by snowmelt in the spring and may supply water for evapotranspiration through the summer/fall. This two-way exchange is underrepresented in land-surface models. Furthermore, the impacts of climate change on the groundwater recharge are uncertain. In this paper, we use a coupled land and groundwater model to investigate the hydrologic cycle of shallow groundwater in the PPR and study its response to climate change at the end of the 21st century. The results show that the model reasonably simulates the water table depth (WTD) and the timing of recharge processes, but underestimates the seasonal variation of WTD, due to mismatches of the soil types between observations and the model. The most significant change under future climate occurs in the winter, when warmer temperature changes the rain/snow partitioning, delay the time for snow accumulation/soil freezing while bring forward early melting/thawing. Such changes lead to an earlier start to a longer recharge season, but with lower recharge rates. Different signals are shown in the eastern and western PPR in the future summer, with reduced precipitation and drier soils in the east but little change in the west. The annual recharge increased by 25% and 50% in the eastern and western PPR, respectively. Additionally, we found the mean and seasonal variation of the simulated WTD are sensitive to soil properties and fine-scale soil information is needed to improve groundwater simulation on regional scale.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Abstract. Billions of people rely on groundwater as being an accessible source of drinking water and for irrigation, especially in times of drought. Its importance will likely increase with a changing climate. It is still unclear, however, how climate change will impact groundwater systems globally and, thus, the availability of this vital resource. Groundwater recharge is an important indicator for groundwater availability, but it is a water flux that is difficult to estimate as uncertainties in the water balance accumulate, leading to possibly large errors in particular in dry regions. This study investigates uncertainties in groundwater recharge projections using a multi-model ensemble of eight global hydrological models (GHMs) that are driven by the bias-adjusted output of four global circulation models (GCMs). Pre-industrial and current groundwater recharge values are compared with recharge for different global warming (GW) levels as a result of three representative concentration pathways (RCPs). Results suggest that projected changes strongly vary among the different GHM–GCM combinations, and statistically significant changes are only computed for a few regions of the world. Statistically significant GWR increases are projected for northern Europe and some parts of the Arctic, East Africa, and India. Statistically significant decreases are simulated in southern Chile, parts of Brazil, central USA, the Mediterranean, and southeastern China. In some regions, reversals of groundwater recharge trends can be observed with global warming. Because most GHMs do not simulate the impact of changing atmospheric CO2 and climate on vegetation and, thus, evapotranspiration, we investigate how estimated changes in GWR are affected by the inclusion of these processes. In some regions, inclusion leads to differences in groundwater recharge changes of up to 100 mm per year. Most GHMs with active vegetation simulate less severe decreases in groundwater recharge than GHMs without active vegetation and, in some regions, even increases instead of decreases are simulated. However, in regions where GCMs predict decreases in precipitation and where groundwater availability is the most important, model agreement among GHMs with active vegetation is the lowest. Overall, large uncertainties in the model outcomes suggest that additional research on simulating groundwater processes in GHMs is necessary.more » « less
