skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: mmijjum/Production_Rates_Calculator: 01_22 - SPRITE
This is an update to the SPRITE framework presented in Mijjum et al. (2025) (up to date as of 01/22/2025). This update fixes a typo in the example inputs spreadsheet. PREVIOUS DESCRIPTION: This is latest (as of 10/28/2024) of the production rate calculator (SPRITE) described in Mijjum et al. (2024) (in review with Geochemistry, Geophysics and Geosystems). Model will calculate scaling factors and exposure ages from 0-70 Ma using a time-varying magnetic field (paleointensity), paleoclimate, and latitude (paleolatitude). Code contributions were made by Moshammat Mijjum (@mmijjum), Katie Bristol (@katiebristol), and Richard Bono (@rkbono), manuscript contributions from Marissa Tremblay (@mtrems), Nat Lifton, and Courtney Sprain.   more » « less
Award ID(s):
2016748
PAR ID:
10650751
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Publisher / Repository:
Zenodo
Date Published:
Edition / Version:
5
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. This Editorial introduces the Virtual Issue ‘Nectar and nectaries’ that includes the following papers: Ballarinet al.(2024), Griersonet al.(2024), Grof‐Tiszaet al.(2025), Landucci & Vannette (2025), Liaoet al.(2025), MacNeillet al.(2025), Magneret al.(2023, 2024, 2025), Minet al.(2019), Mouet al.(2025), Parkinsonet al.(2025), Quevedo‐Caraballoet al.(2025), Ramoset al.(2025), Romero‐Bravo & Castellanos (2024), Soareset al.(2025), Turneret al.(2025), Zhaiet al.(2025), Zhanget al.(2020). Access the Virtual Issue atwww.newphytologist.com/virtualissues. 
    more » « less
  2. The 2019 report of ferroelectricity in (Al,Sc)N [Fichtner et al., J. Appl. Phys. 125, 114103 (2019)] broke a long-standing tradition of considering AlN the textbook example of a polar but non-ferroelectric material. Combined with the recent emergence of ferroelectricity in HfO2-based fluorites [Böscke et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 102903 (2011)], these unexpected discoveries have reinvigorated studies of integrated ferroelectrics, with teams racing to understand the fundamentals and/or deploy these new materials—or, more correctly, attractive new capabilities of old materials—in commercial devices. The five years since the seminal report of ferroelectric (Al,Sc)N [Fichtner et al., J. Appl. Phys. 125, 114103 (2019)] have been particularly exciting, and several aspects of recent advances have already been covered in recent review articles [Jena et al., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 58, SC0801 (2019); Wang et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 124, 150501 (2024); Kim et al., Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 422–441 (2023); and F. Yang, Adv. Electron. Mater. 11, 2400279 (2024)]. We focus here on how the ferroelectric wurtzites have made the field rethink domain walls and the polarization reversal process—including the very character of spontaneous polarization itself—beyond the classic understanding that was based primarily around perovskite oxides and extended to other chemistries with various caveats. The tetrahedral and highly covalent bonding of AlN along with the correspondingly large bandgap lead to fundamental differences in doping/alloying, defect compensation, and charge distribution when compared to the classic ferroelectric systems; combined with the unipolar symmetry of the wurtzite structure, the result is a class of ferroelectrics that are both familiar and puzzling, with characteristics that seem to be perfectly enabling and simultaneously nonstarters for modern integrated devices. The goal of this review is to (relatively) quickly bring the reader up to speed on the current—at least as of early 2025—understanding of domains and defects in wurtzite ferroelectrics, covering the most relevant work on the fundamental science of these materials as well as some of the most exciting work in early demonstrations of device structures. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract Herein, we rebut the critique of Patton et al. (2020), entitled, “No evidence that a transmissible cancer has shifted from emergence to endemism”, by Stammnitz et al. (2024). First and foremost, the authors do not conduct any phylogenetic or epidemiological analyses to rebut the inferences from the main results of the Patton et al. (2020) article, rendering the title of their rebuttal without evidence or merit. Additionally, Stammnitz et al. (2024) present a phylogenetic tree based on only 32 copy number variants (not typically used in phylogenetic analyses and evolve in a completely different way than DNA sequences) to “rebut” our tree that was inferred from 436.1 kb of sequence data and nearly two orders of magnitude more parsimony-informative sites (2520 SNPs). As such it is not surprising that their phylogeny did not have a similar branching pattern to ours, given that support for each branch of their tree was weak and the essentially formed a polytomy. That is, one could rotate their resulting tree in any direction and by nature, it would not match ours. While the authors are correct that we used suboptimal filtering of our raw whole genome sequencing data, re-analyses of the data with 30X coverage, as suggested, resulted in a mutation rate similar to that reported in Stammnitz et al. (2024). Most importantly, when we re-analyzed our data, as well as Stammnitz et al.’s own data, the results of the Patton et al. (2020) article are supported with both datasets. That is, the effective transmission rate of DFTD has transitioned over time to approach one, suggesting endemism; and, the spread of DFTD is rapid and omnidirectional despite the observed east-to-west wave of spread. Overall, Stammnitz et al. (2024) not only fail to provide evidence to contradict the findings of Patton et al. (2020), but rather help support the results with their own data. 
    more » « less
  4. Abscisic acid (ABA) is an essential plant hormone that regulates multiple aspects of plant development and numerous abiotic stress responses (Cutler et al., 2010; Waadt et al., 2022). In fact, at the heart of plants’ responses to stresses such as salinity, drought, and hypertonic conditions, among others, is this phytohormone (Cutler et al., 2010; Waadt et al., 2022). Interestingly, stress-triggered and developmental responses to this hormone have been found to involve basic RNA metabolism components, including the two subunits of the nuclear cap-binding complex, ABA HYPERSENSITIVE1 (ABH1/CBP80) and CBP20 (Hugouvieux et al., 2001). Additionally, multiple lines of evidence have linked small RNA (smRNA)-mediated RNA silencing to ABA responses (Gregory et al., 2008; Laubinger et al., 2008). A new study by Yan et al. (2025) has provided new insights regarding how RNA degradation and silencing factors modulate smRNA biogenesis from NITRATE REDUCTASE1/2 transcripts to affect ABA-regulated abiotic stress responses. 
    more » « less
  5. This archive contains 2-min mean remotely sensed surface currents generated using optical imagery and PIV (Dooley et al., 2024) from field experiments (2013, 2018, 2021, 2022) occurring at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Field Research Facility, in Duck, NC. The README.txt file contains information regarding variables found in the MATLAB (PVLAB_PIV_SurfaceFlows.mat) file, including estimate locations, units, and timestamps. Estimates were generated at times with appropriate conditions for remote sensing (e.g., sufficient foam tracer) that were within 1-day of measured bathymetry at the field site. Additional data for the field site (obtained by the USACE Field Research Facility or by NOAA) including the measured bathymetry and wave conditions can be found at: https://chlthredds.erdc.dren.mil/thredds/catalog/frf/catalog.html Remote sensing estimates are not perfect and errors in filtering out bad data are possible. Please reach out to Ciara Dooley at cdooley@whoi.edu, Steve Elgar at selgar@mac.com, and Britt Raubenheimer at braubenheimer@whoi.edu if you have any questions. Additionally, the optical imagery (large dataset, many TBs) used to generate flow estimates can be accessed by contacting the authors. 
    more » « less