skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


This content will become publicly available on February 1, 2026

Title: Eruptive mass loss less than a year before the explosion of superluminous supernovae: I. The cases of SN 2020xga and SN 2022xgc
We present photometric and spectroscopic observations of SN 2020xga and SN 2022xgc, two hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae (SLSNe-I) atz = 0.4296 andz = 0.3103, respectively, which show an additional set of broad Mg IIabsorption lines, blueshifted by a few thousands kilometer second−1with respect to the host galaxy absorption system. Previous work interpreted this as due to resonance line scattering of the SLSN continuum by rapidly expanding circumstellar material (CSM) expelled shortly before the explosion. The peak rest-frameg-band magnitude of SN 2020xga is −22.30 ± 0.04 mag and of SN 2022xgc is −21.97 ± 0.05 mag, placing them among the brightest SLSNe-I. We used high-quality spectra from ultraviolet to near-infrared wavelengths to model the Mg IIline profiles and infer the properties of the CSM shells. We find that the CSM shell of SN 2020xga resides at ∼1.3 × 1016cm, moving with a maximum velocity of 4275 km s−1, and the shell of SN 2022xgc is located at ∼0.8 × 1016cm, reaching up to 4400 km s−1. These shells were expelled ∼11 and ∼5 months before the explosions of SN 2020xga and SN 2022xgc, respectively, possibly as a result of luminous-blue-variable-like eruptions or pulsational pair instability (PPI) mass loss. We also analyzed optical photometric data and modeled the light curves, considering powering from the magnetar spin-down mechanism. The results support very energetic magnetars, approaching the mass-shedding limit, powering these SNe with ejecta masses of ∼7 − 9 M. The ejecta masses inferred from the magnetar modeling are not consistent with the PPI scenario pointing toward stars > 50 MHe-core; hence, alternative scenarios such as fallback accretion and CSM interaction are discussed. Modeling the spectral energy distribution of the host galaxy of SN 2020xga reveals a host mass of 107.8M, a star formation rate of 0.96−0.26+0.47Myr−1, and a metallicity of ∼0.2 Z more » « less
Award ID(s):
1911225 1911151
PAR ID:
10653577
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; more » ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; « less
Publisher / Repository:
A&A
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Volume:
694
ISSN:
0004-6361
Page Range / eLocation ID:
A292
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. SN 2020zbf is a hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova (SLSN) atz = 0.1947 that shows conspicuous C IIfeatures at early times, in contrast to the majority of H-poor SLSNe. Its peak magnitude isMg = −21.2 mag and its rise time (≲26.4 days from first light) places SN 2020zbf among the fastest rising type I SLSNe. We used spectra taken from ultraviolet (UV) to near-infrared wavelengths to identify spectral features. We paid particular attention to the C IIlines as they present distinctive characteristics when compared to other events. We also analyzed UV and optical photometric data and modeled the light curves considering three different powering mechanisms: radioactive decay of56Ni, magnetar spin-down, and circumstellar medium (CSM) interaction. The spectra of SN 2020zbf match the model spectra of a C-rich low-mass magnetar-powered supernova model well. This is consistent with our light curve modeling, which supports a magnetar-powered event with an ejecta massMej = 1.5 M. However, we cannot discard the CSM-interaction model as it may also reproduce the observed features. The interaction with H-poor, carbon-oxygen CSM near peak light could explain the presence of C IIemission lines. A short plateau in the light curve around 35–45 days after peak, in combination with the presence of an emission line at 6580 Å, can also be interpreted as being due to a late interaction with an extended H-rich CSM. Both the magnetar and CSM-interaction models of SN 2020zbf indicate that the progenitor mass at the time of explosion is between 2 and 5M. Modeling the spectral energy distribution of the host galaxy reveals a host mass of 108.7M, a star formation rate of 0.24−0.12+0.41Myr−1, and a metallicity of ∼0.4Z
    more » « less
  2. Abstract We present a comprehensive analysis of the photometric and spectroscopic evolution of SN 2021foa, unique among the class of transitional supernovae for repeatedly changing its spectroscopic appearance from hydrogen-to-helium-to-hydrogen dominated (IIn-to-Ibn-to-IIn) within 50 days past peak brightness. The spectra exhibit multiple narrow (≈300–600 km s−1) absorption lines of hydrogen, helium, calcium, and iron together with broad helium emission lines with a full width at half-maximum (FWHM) of ∼6000 km s−1. For a steady, wind mass-loss regime, light-curve modeling results in an ejecta mass of ∼8Mand circumstellar material (CSM) mass below 1M, and an ejecta velocity consistent with the FWHM of the broad helium lines. We obtain a mass-loss rate of ≈2Myr−1. This mass-loss rate is 3 orders of magnitude larger than derived for normal Type II supernovae. We estimate that the bulk of the CSM of SN 2021foa must have been expelled within half a year, about 12 yr ago. Our analysis suggests that SN 2021foa had a helium-rich ejecta that swept up a dense shell of hydrogen-rich CSM shortly after explosion. At about 60 days past peak brightness, the photosphere recedes through the dense ejecta-CSM region, occulting much of the redshifted emission of the hydrogen and helium lines, which results in an observed blueshift (∼−3000 km s−1). Strong mass-loss activity prior to explosion, such as those seen in SN 2009ip-like objects and SN 2021foa as precursor emission, are the likely origin of a complex, multiple-shell CSM close to the progenitor star. 
    more » « less
  3. null (Ed.)
    ABSTRACT We present and discuss the optical spectrophotometric observations of the nearby (z = 0.087) Type I superluminous supernova (SLSN I) SN 2017gci, whose peak K-corrected absolute magnitude reaches Mg = −21.5 mag. Its photometric and spectroscopic evolution includes features of both slow- and of fast-evolving SLSN I, thus favoring a continuum distribution between the two SLSN-I subclasses. In particular, similarly to other SLSNe I, the multiband light curves (LCs) of SN 2017gci show two re-brightenings at about 103 and 142 d after the maximum light. Interestingly, this broadly agrees with a broad emission feature emerging around 6520 Å after ∼51 d from the maximum light, which is followed by a sharp knee in the LC. If we interpret this feature as Hα, this could support the fact that the bumps are the signature of late interactions of the ejecta with a (hydrogen-rich) circumstellar material. Then we fitted magnetar- and CSM-interaction-powered synthetic LCs on to the bolometric one of SN 2017gci. In the magnetar case, the fit suggests a polar magnetic field Bp ≃ 6 × 1014 G, an initial period of the magnetar Pinitial ≃ 2.8 ms, an ejecta mass $$M_{\rm ejecta}\simeq 9\, \mathrm{M}_\odot $$ and an ejecta opacity $$\kappa \simeq 0.08\, \mathrm{cm}^{2}\, \rm{g}^{-1}$$. A CSM-interaction scenario would imply a CSM mass $$\simeq 5\, \mathrm{M}_\odot $$ and an ejecta mass $$\simeq 12\, \mathrm{M}_\odot $$. Finally, the nebular spectrum of phase  + 187 d was modeled, deriving a mass of $$\sim 10\, {\rm M}_\odot$$ for the ejecta. Our models suggest that either a magnetar or CSM interaction might be the power sources for SN 2017gci and that its progenitor was a massive ($$40\, {\rm M}_\odot$$) star. 
    more » « less
  4. Abstract We present a detailed study of SN 2024ahr, a hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova (SLSN-I), for which we determine a redshift ofz= 0.0861. SN 2024ahr has a peak absolute magnitude ofMg≈Mr≈ −21 mag, rest-frame rise and decline times (50% of peak) of about 40 and 80 days, respectively, and typical spectroscopic evolution in the optical band. Similarly, modeling of the UV/optical light curves with a magnetar spin-down engine leads to typical parameters: an initial spin period of ≈3.3 ms, a magnetic field strength of ≈6 × 1013G, and an ejecta mass of ≈9.5M. Due to its relatively low redshift, we obtained a high signal-to-noise ratio near-IR (NIR) spectrum about 43 rest-frame days postpeak to search for the presence of helium. We do not detect any significant feature at the location of the Heiλ2.058μm feature and place a conservative upper limit of ∼0.05Mon the mass of helium in the outer ejecta. We detect broad features of Mgiλ1.575μm and Mgiiλ2.136μm, which are typical of Type Ic SNe, but with higher velocities. Examining the sample of SLSNe-I with NIR spectroscopy, we find that, unlike SN 2024ahr, these events are generally peculiar. This highlights the need for a large sample of prototypical SLSNe-I with NIR spectroscopy to constrain the fraction of progenitors with helium (Ib-like) and without helium (Ic-like) at the time of explosion, and hence the evolutionary path(s) leading to the rare outcome of SLSNe-I. 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract We present extensive ultraviolet, optical, and near-infrared (NIR) photometric and spectroscopic observations of the nearby hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova (SLSN-I) SN 2024rmj atz= 0.1189. SN 2024rmj reached a peak absolute magnitude ofMg ≈ −21.9, placing it at the luminous end of the SLSN-I distribution. The light curve exhibits a pronounced prepeak bump (≈60 days before the main peak) and a postpeak bump (≈55 days after the main peak). The bulk of the light curve is otherwise well fit by a magnetar spin-down model, with typical values (spin: ≈2.1 ms; magnetic field: ≈6 × 1013G; ejecta mass: ≈12M). The optical spectra exhibit characteristic SLSN-I features and evolution, but with a relatively high velocity of ≈8000 km s−1postpeak. Most significantly, we find a clear detection of helium in the NIR spectra at Heiλ1.083μm andλ2.058μm, blueshifted by ≈15,000 km s−1(13 days before peak) and ≈13,000 km s−1(40 days after peak), indicating that helium is confined to the outermost ejecta; based on these NIR detections, we also identify likely contribution from Heiλ5876 in the optical spectra on a similar range of timescales. This represents the most definitive detection of helium in a bright SLSN-I to date, and indicates that progenitors with a thin helium layer can still explode as SLSNe. 
    more » « less