skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Attention:

The NSF Public Access Repository (PAR) system and access will be unavailable from 10:00 PM ET on Friday, February 6 until 10:00 AM ET on Saturday, February 7 due to maintenance. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Structural insight into the substrate binding of the AMT complex via an inhibitor‐trapped state
Abstract N6‐adenine (6mA) DNA methylation plays an important role in gene regulation and genome stability. The 6mA methylation inTetrahymena thermophilais mainly mediated by the AMT complex, comprised of the AMT1, AMT7, AMTP1, and AMTP2 subunits. To date, how this complex assembles on the DNA substrate remains elusive. Here we report the structure of the AMT complex bound to the OCR protein from bacteriophage T7, mimicking the AMT–DNA encounter complex. The AMT1–AMT7 heterodimer approaches OCR from one side, while the AMTP1 N‐terminal domain, assuming a homeodomain fold, binds to OCR from the other side, resulting in a saddle‐shaped architecture reminiscent of what was observed for prokaryotic 6mA writers. Mutation of the AMT1, AMT7, and AMTP1 residues on the OCR‐contact points led to impaired DNA methylation activity to various extents, supporting a role for these residues in DNA binding. Furthermore, structural comparison of the AMT1–AMT7 subunits with the evolutionarily related METTL3–METTL14 and AMT1–AMT6 complexes reveals sequence conservation and divergence in the region corresponding to the OCR‐binding site, shedding light on the substrate binding of the latter two complexes. Together, this study supports a model in which the AMT complex undergoes a substrate binding‐induced open‐to‐closed conformational transition, with implications in its substrate binding and processive 6mA methylation.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2435178
PAR ID:
10653714
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley-Blackwell
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Protein science
Volume:
34
Issue:
9
ISSN:
0961-8368
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, bioRxiv)
    Abstract N6-adenine methylation occurs in both DNA and RNA (referred to as 6mA and m6A, respectively). As an extensively characterized epi-transcriptomic mark found in virtually all eukaryotes, m6A in mRNA is deposited by METTL3-METTL14 complex. As a transcription-associated epigenetic mark abundantly present in many unicellular eukaryotes, 6mA is coordinately maintained by two AMT1 complexes, distinguished by their mutually exclusive subunits, AMT6 and AMT7. These are all members of MT-A70 family methyltransferases (MTases). Despite their functional importance, no structure for holo-complexes with cognate DNA/RNA substrate has been resolved. Here, we employ AlphaFold3 (AF3) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations for structural modeling ofTetrahymenaAMT1 complexes, with emphasis on ternary holo-complexes with double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) substrate and cofactor. Key structural features observed in these models are validated by mutagenesis and various other biophysical and biochemical approaches. Our analysis reveals the structural basis for DNA substrate recognition, base flipping, and catalysis in the prototypical eukaryotic DNA 6mA-MTase. It also allows us to delineate the reaction pathway for processive DNA methylation involving translocation of the closed form AMT1 complex along dsDNA. As the active site is highly conserved across MT-A70 family of eukaryotic 6mA/m6A-MTases, the structural insight will facilitate rational design of small molecule inhibitors, especially for METTL3-METTL14, a promising target in cancer therapeutics. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, Genome Research)
    Although DNAN6-adenine methylation (6mA) is best known in prokaryotes, its presence in eukaryotes has recently generated great interest. Biochemical and genetic evidence supports that AMT1, an MT-A70 family methyltransferase (MTase), is crucial for 6mA deposition in unicellular eukaryotes. Nonetheless, the 6mA transmission mechanism remains to be elucidated. Taking advantage of single-molecule real-time circular consensus sequencing (SMRT CCS), here we provide definitive evidence for semiconservative transmission of 6mA inTetrahymena thermophila. In wild-type (WT) cells, 6mA occurs at the self-complementary ApT dinucleotide, mostly in full methylation (full-6mApT); after DNA replication, hemi-methylation (hemi-6mApT) is transiently present on the parental strand, opposite to the daughter strand readily labeled by 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU). In ΔAMT1cells, 6mA predominantly occurs as hemi-6mApT. Hemi-to-full conversion in WT cells is fast, robust, and processive, whereas de novo methylation in ΔAMT1cells is slow and sporadic. InTetrahymena, regularly spaced 6mA clusters coincide with the linker DNA of nucleosomes arrayed in the gene body. Importantly, in vitro methylation of human chromatin by the reconstituted AMT1 complex recapitulates preferential targeting of hemi-6mApT sites in linker DNA, supporting AMT1's intrinsic and autonomous role in maintenance methylation. We conclude that 6mA is transmitted by a semiconservative mechanism: full-6mApT is split by DNA replication into hemi-6mApT, which is restored to full-6mApT by AMT1-dependent maintenance methylation. Our study dissects AMT1-dependent maintenance methylation and AMT1-independent de novo methylation, reveals a 6mA transmission pathway with a striking similarity to 5-methylcytosine (5mC) transmission at the CpG dinucleotide, and establishes 6mA as a bona fide eukaryotic epigenetic mark. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
    Stable inheritance of DNA N6-methyladenine (6mA) is crucial for its biological functions in eukaryotes. Here, we identify two distinct methyltransferase (MTase) complexes, both sharing the catalytic subunit AMT1, but featuring AMT6 and AMT7 as their unique components, respectively. While the two complexes are jointly responsible for 6mA maintenance methylation, they exhibit distinct enzymology, DNA/chromatin affinity, genomic distribution, and knockout phenotypes. AMT7 complex, featuring high MTase activity and processivity, is connected to transcription-associated epigenetic marks, including H2A.Z and H3K4me3, and is required for the bulk of maintenance methylation. In contrast, AMT6 complex, with reduced activity and processivity, is recruited by PCNA to initiate maintenance methylation immediately after DNA replication. These two complexes coordinate in maintenance methylation. By integrating signals from both replication and transcription, this mechanism ensures the faithful and efficient transmission of 6mA as an epigenetic mark in eukaryotes. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Protein Science)
    Abstract An increased understanding of how the acceptor site in Gcn5‐relatedN‐acetyltransferase (GNAT) enzymes recognizes various substrates provides important clues for GNAT functional annotation and their use as chemical tools. In this study, we explored how the PA3944 enzyme fromPseudomonas aeruginosarecognizes three different acceptor substrates, including aspartame, NANMO, and polymyxin B, and identified acceptor residues that are critical for substrate specificity. To achieve this, we performed a series of molecular docking simulations and tested methods to identify acceptor substrate binding modes that are catalytically relevant. We found that traditional selection of best docking poses by lowest S scores did not reveal acceptor substrate binding modes that were generally close enough to the donor for productive acetylation. Instead, sorting poses based on distance between the acceptor amine nitrogen atom and donor carbonyl carbon atom placed these acceptor substrates near residues that contribute to substrate specificity and catalysis. To assess whether these residues are indeed contributors to substrate specificity, we mutated seven amino acid residues to alanine and determined their kinetic parameters. We identified several residues that improved the apparent affinity and catalytic efficiency of PA3944, especially for NANMO and/or polymyxin B. Additionally, one mutant (R106A) exhibited substrate inhibition toward NANMO, and we propose scenarios for the cause of this inhibition based on additional substrate docking studies with R106A. Ultimately, we propose that this residue is a key gatekeeper between the acceptor and donor sites by restricting and orienting the acceptor substrate within the acceptor site. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Protein Science)
    Cortajarena, Aitziber L (Ed.)
    Abstract Palladin is an actin‐binding protein that accelerates actin polymerization and is linked to the metastasis of several types of cancer. Previously, three lysine residues in an immunoglobulin‐like domain of palladin have been identified as essential for actin binding. However, it is still unknown where palladin binds to F‐actin. Evidence that palladin binds to the sides of actin filaments to facilitate branching is supported by our previous study showing that palladin was able to compensate for Arp2/3 in the formation ofListeriaactin comet tails. Here, we used chemical crosslinking to covalently link palladin and F‐actin residues based on spatial proximity. Samples were then enzymatically digested, separated by liquid chromatography, and analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry. Peptides containing the crosslinks and specific residues involved were then identified for input to the HADDOCK docking server to model the most likely binding conformation. Small‐angle x‐ray scattering was used to provide further insight into palladin flexibility and the binding interface, and NMR spectra identified potential interactions between palladin's Ig domains. Our final structural model of the F‐actin:palladin complex revealed how palladin interacts with and stabilizes F‐actin at the interface between two actin monomers. Three actin residues that were identified in this study also appear commonly in the actin‐binding interface with other proteins such as myotilin, myosin, and tropomodulin. An accurate structural representation of the complex between palladin and actin extends our understanding of palladin's role in promoting cancer metastasis through the regulation of actin dynamics. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Text Encoded Conversion
  • XML
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email