skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Neglecting non‐vascular plants leads to underestimation of grassland plant diversity loss under experimental nutrient addition
Abstract Nutrient availability and grazing are known as main drivers of grassland plant diversity, and increased nutrient availability and long‐term cessation of grazing often decrease local‐scale plant diversity. Experimental tests of mechanisms determining plant diversity focus mainly on vascular plants (VP), whereas non‐vascular plants (NVP, here bryophytes) have been ignored. It is therefore not known how the current models based on VPs predict the rates of total (NVP + VP) losses in plant diversity.Here we used plant community data, including VPs and NVPs, from nine sites in Europe and North America and belonging to the Nutrient Network experiment, to test whether neglecting NVPs leads to biased estimates of plant diversity loss rates. The plant communities were subjected to factorial addition of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium with micronutrients (K), as well as a grazing exclusion combined with multi‐nutrient fertilization (NPK) treatment.We found that nutrient additions reduced both NVP and VP species richness, but the effects on NVP species richness were on average stronger than on VPs: NVP species richness decreased 67%, while VP species richness decreased 28%, causing their combined richness to decrease 38% in response to multi‐nutrient (NPK) fertilization. Thus, VP diversity alone underestimated total plant diversity loss by 10 percentage points.Although NVP and VP species diversities similarly declined in response to N and NPKfertilizations, the evenness of NVPs increased and that of VPs remained unchanged. NP, NPKfertilization and NPKfertilization combined with grazing exclusion, associated with decreasing light availability at ground level, led to the strongest loss of NVP species or probability of NVP presence. However, grazing did not generally mitigate the fertilization effects.Synthesis. In nine grassland sites in Europe and North America, nutrient addition caused a larger relative decline in non‐vascular plant (NVP) than vascular plant species richness. Hence, not accounting for NVPs can lead to underestimation of losses in plant diversity in response to continued nutrient pollution of grasslands.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1831944
PAR ID:
10659522
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Journal of Ecology
Volume:
113
Issue:
7
ISSN:
0022-0477
Page Range / eLocation ID:
1672 to 1685
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract Global changes such as nitrogen (N) enrichment and elevated carbon dioxide (CO2) are known to exacerbate biodiversity loss in grassland ecosystems. They do so by modifying processes whose strength may vary at different spatial scales. Yet, whether and how global changes impact plant diversity at different spatial scales remains elusive.We collected data on species presence and cover at a high resolution in the third decade of a long‐term temperate grassland biodiversity—global change experiment. Based on the data, we constructed species—area relationships across three spatial orders of magnitude (from 0.01 to 3.24 m2) and compared them for the different global change treatments.We found that N enrichment, both under ambient and elevated CO2levels, decreased species richness across almost all spatial scales, with proportional decreases being largest at the smallest spatial scales. Elevated CO2also reduced richness at both ambient and enriched N supply rates but did so proportionally across all spatial scales. Suppression of diversity was stronger at all scales for diversity indices that include relative abundances than for species richness. Taken together, these results suggest that CO2and N are re‐organizing this grassland system by increasingly favouring, at fine scales, a small subset of dominant species.Synthesis: Our results highlight the role of spatial scales in influencing biodiversity loss, especially when it is driven by anthropogenic resource changes that might influence species interactions differently across spatial scales. 
    more » « less
  2. Gallery, Rachel (Ed.)
    Abstract Livestock grazing has been shown to alter the structure and functions of grassland ecosystems. It is well acknowledged that grazing pressure is one of the strongest drivers of ecosystem‐level effects of grazing, but few studies have assessed how grazing pressure impacts grassland biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality (EMF).Here, we assessed how different metrics of biodiversity (i.e., plants and soil microbes) andEMFresponded to seven different grazing treatments based on an 11‐year field experiment in semi‐arid Inner Mongolian steppe.We found that soil organic carbon, plant‐available nitrogen and plant functional diversity all decreased even at low grazing pressure, while above‐ground primary production and bacterial abundance decreased only at high levels of grazing pressure.Structural equation models revealed thatEMFwas driven by direct effects of grazing, rather than the effects of grazing on plant or microbial community composition. Grazing effects on plant functional diversity and soil microbial abundance did have moderate effects onEMF, while plant richness did not.Synthesis. Our results showed ecosystem functions differ in their sensitivity to grazing pressure, requiring a low grazing threshold to achieve multiple goals in the Eurasian steppe. Aplain language summaryis available for this article. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract Climate change poses a growing threat to many ecosystems, including grasslands, which are a current priority for conservation due to their vulnerability to interacting threats from human activity.North American grasslands are expected to experience warmer temperatures and more frequent and severe droughts in the coming decades, with potential consequences for native biodiversity.We conducted an experiment at Cedar Creek Ecosystem Science Reserve, Minnesota, USA, to investigate how warming and drought treatments affected grassland plant community structure over 6 years in plots planted with species mixtures.Warming consistently reduced plant species richness with its effects on Shannon diversity (which additionally considers species' relative abundances) and dominance varying across years. These warming‐by‐year interactions were likely driven by temporal variability in environmental conditions and species‐specific responses. Notably, legumes consistently showed positive responses to warming.Drought alone had minimal direct effects on species richness and diversity but reduced variability in diversity responses over time, suggesting greater stability of diversity under drought conditions.Synthesis. This study underscores the important role of warming in reducing species richness, altering diversity and reshaping functional group composition in grassland ecosystems. While temporal variability influenced the magnitude of warming effects on diversity, legumes' positive responses highlight the importance of functional group dynamics in potentially buffering against species loss. Long‐term experiments that allow consideration of interannual variability are essential for improving predictions of ecosystem responses and informing adaptive management strategies aimed at sustaining biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in grasslands. 
    more » « less
  4. Abstract Nutrient enrichment impacts grassland plant diversity such as species richness, functional trait composition and diversity, but whether and how these changes affect ecosystem stability in the face of increasing climate extremes remains largely unknown.We quantified the direct and diversity‐mediated effects of nutrient addition (by nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium) on the stability of above‐ground biomass production in 10 long‐term grassland experimental sites. We measured five facets of stability as the temporal invariability, resistance during and recovery after extreme dry and wet growing seasons.Leaf traits (leaf carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and specific leaf area) were measured under ambient and nutrient addition conditions in the field and were used to construct the leaf economic spectrum (LES). We calculated functional trait composition and diversity of LES and of single leaf traits. We quantified the contribution of intraspecific trait shifts and species replacement to change in functional trait composition as responses to nutrient addition and its implications for ecosystem stability.Nutrient addition decreased functional trait diversity and drove grassland communities to the faster end of the LES primarily through intraspecific trait shifts, suggesting that intraspecific trait shifts should be included for accurately predicting ecosystem stability. Moreover, the change in functional trait diversity of the LES in turn influenced different facets of stability. That said, these diversity‐mediated effects were overall weak and/or overwhelmed by the direct effects of nutrient addition on stability. As a result, nutrient addition did not strongly impact any of the stability facets. These results were generally consistent using individual leaf traits but the dominant pathways differed. Importantly, major influencing pathways differed using average trait values extracted from global trait databases (e.g. TRY).Synthesis. Investigating changes in multiple facets of plant diversity and their impacts on multidimensional stability under global changes such as nutrient enrichment can improve our understanding of the processes and mechanisms maintaining ecosystem stability. 
    more » « less
  5. Despite their ecological significance, non‐vascular photoautotrophs (NVPs) are frequently excluded from ecological experimental studies, leading to a limited comprehension of how their communities are affected by the ecosystem dynamics and an underestimation of their role in ecosystem functioning. We studied the impact of vascular plant taxonomic and functional diversity on three groups of ground NVPs (lichens, bryophytes, and cyanobacteria) within one of the longest‐running plant biodiversity experiments (Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function at Cedar Creek Ecosystem Science Reserve). Utilizing the permanent plot framework of this experiment, we analyzed the effects of almost 30 years of treatment across various levels of vascular plant taxonomic and functional diversity on NVPs. For each diversity level we documented NVP cover and richness. Using generalized linear models we evaluated the effect of vascular plant taxonomic and functional diversity, as well as environmental factors affected by vascular diversity (such as vascular plant cover, light penetration, soil nutrient content, and microtopography) on NVP richness and cover. Using these models, we conducted structural equation modeling analyses (SEM) that allowed us to differentiate the direct and indirect impacts of vascular plant taxonomic and functional diversity on NVPs. Our results showed that both lichen and bryophyte richness and cover decreased with higher vascular plant taxonomic and functional diversity, while cyanobacteria cover increased as a function of the same parameters. We also showed that microtopography serves as better predictor for lichens and bryophytes, while nutrient‐related factors perform better as predictors for cyanobacteria. Additionally, our findings indicate that NVP cover ranged from 0.001% to 100% (mean 15%) in the surveyed plots, representing a major, still ignored, component of the experimental plots. This study shows that vascular plant diversity directly and indirectly affects NVP communities, but the consequences of these effects at community and ecosystem levels are still to be explored. 
    more » « less