More Like this

1. Evaluation of the effects of chemically enhanced primary treatment on landfill leachate and sewage co-treatment in publicly owned treatment works

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102116  

   Patel, Harsh V.; Brazil, Brian; Lou, Helen H.; Jha, Manoj K.; Luster-Teasley, Stephanie; Zhao, Renzun (August 2021, Journal of Water Process Engineering)

   null (Ed.)
2. Computational identification of biomarker genes for lung cancer considering treatment and non-treatment studies

   https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-020-3524-8  

   Maharjan, M; Tanvir, Raihanul B; Chowdhury, K; Duan, W; Mondal, Ananda M. (December 2020, BMC bioinformatics)

   null (Ed.)
3. Urban stormwater characterization, control, and treatment

   https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.1403  

   Rodak, Carolyn M.; Jayakaran, Anand D.; Moore, Trisha L.; David, Ray; Rhodes, Emily R.; Vogel, Jason R. (October 2020, Water Environment Research)

   null (Ed.)
4. Treatment Effect Risk: Bounds and Inference

   https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4819  

   Kallus, Nathan (August 2023, Management Science)

   Because the average treatment effect (ATE) measures the change in social welfare, even if positive, there is a risk of negative effect on, say, some 10% of the population. Assessing such risk is difficult, however, because any one individual treatment effect (ITE) is never observed, so the 10% worst-affected cannot be identified, whereas distributional treatment effects only compare the first deciles within each treatment group, which does not correspond to any 10% subpopulation. In this paper, we consider how to nonetheless assess this important risk measure, formalized as the conditional value at risk (CVaR) of the ITE distribution. We leverage the availability of pretreatment covariates and characterize the tightest possible upper and lower bounds on ITE-CVaR given by the covariate-conditional average treatment effect (CATE) function. We then proceed to study how to estimate these bounds efficiently from data and construct confidence intervals. This is challenging even in randomized experiments as it requires understanding the distribution of the unknown CATE function, which can be very complex if we use rich covariates to best control for heterogeneity. We develop a debiasing method that overcomes this and prove it enjoys favorable statistical properties even when CATE and other nuisances are estimated by black box machine learning or even inconsistently. Studying a hypothetical change to French job search counseling services, our bounds and inference demonstrate a small social benefit entails a negative impact on a substantial subpopulation. This paper was accepted by J. George Shanthikumar, data science. Funding: This work was supported by the Division of Information and Intelligent Systems [Grant 1939704]. Supplemental Material: The data files and online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4819 . 

   more » « less
5. Treatment Effect Risk: Bounds and Inference

   Kallus, Nathan (January 2022, ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency)