An official website of the United States government
We provide an updated analysis of the gamma-ray signature of a terrestrial gamma ray flash (TGF) detected by the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor first reported by Pu et al. 2020. A TGF produced 3 ms prior to a negative cloud-to-ground return stroke was close to simultaneous with an isolated low frequency radio pulse during the leader’s propagation, with a polarity indicating downward moving negative charge. In prior observations this ‘slow’ low frequency signal has been strongly correlated with upward (opposite polarity) directed TGF events [Pu et al. 2019; Cummer et al. 2011] leading the authors to conclude that the Fermi gamma ray observation is actually the result of a reverse positron beam generating upward directed gamma rays. We investigate the feasibility of this scenario and determine a lower limit on the luminosity of the downward TGF from the perspective of gamma-ray timing uncertainties, TGF Monte Carlo simulations, and meteorological analysis of a model storm cell and its possible charge structure altitudes. We determined the most likely source altitude of the reverse beam TGF to be 7.5 km +/- 2.6 km, just below an estimated negative charge center at 8 km. At that altitude the Monte Carlo simulations indicate a lower luminosity limit of 2 x 10^18 photons above 1 MeV for the main downward beam of the TGF making the reverse beam detectable by the Fermi Gamma Ray Burst Monitor. Geant4 Python
more »
« less
Determining a lower limit of luminosity for the first satellite observation of a reverse beam terrestrial gamma-ray flash associated with a cloud to ground lightning leader
We provide an updated analysis of the gamma-ray signature of a terrestrial gamma ray flash (TGF) detected by the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor first reported by Pu et al. 2020. A TGF produced 3 ms prior to a negative cloud-to-ground return stroke was close to simultaneous with an isolated low frequency radio pulse during the leader's propagation, with a polarity indicating downward moving negative charge. In prior observations this 'slow' low frequency signal has been strongly correlated with upward (opposite polarity) directed TGF events [Pu et al. 2019; Cummer et al. 2011] leading the authors to conclude that the Fermi gamma ray observation is actually the result of a reverse positron beam generating upward directed gamma rays. We investigate the feasibility of this scenario and determine a lower limit on the luminosity of the downward TGF from the perspective of gamma-ray timing uncertainties, TGF Monte Carlo simulations, and meteorological analysis of a model storm cell and its possible charge structure altitudes. We determined the most likely source altitude of the reverse beam TGF to be 7.5 km +/- 2.6 km, just below an estimated negative charge center at 8 km. At that altitude the Monte Carlo simulations indicate a lower luminosity limit of 2 x 10^18 photons above 1 MeV for the main downward beam of the TGF making the reverse beam detectable by the Fermi Gamma Ray Burst Monitor. Geant4 Python Funding provided by: National Science FoundationCrossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001Award Number: AGS-193598
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2235299
- PAR ID:
- 10661856
- Publisher / Repository:
- Zenodo
- Date Published:
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Right(s):
- MIT License
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract We provide an updated analysis of the gamma ray signature of a terrestrial gamma ray flash (TGF) detected by the Fermi Gamma ray Burst Monitor first reported by Pu et al. (2020,https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089427). A TGF produced 3 ms prior to a negative cloud‐to‐ground return stroke was close to simultaneous with an isolated low‐frequency radio pulse during the leader’s propagation, with a polarity indicating downward moving negative charge. In previous observations, this “slow” low‐frequency signal has been strongly correlated with upward‐directed (opposite polarity) TGF events (Pu et al., 2019,https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082743; Cummer et al., 2011,https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048099), leading the authors to conclude that the Fermi gamma ray observation is actually the result of a reverse positron beam generating upward‐directed gamma rays. We investigate the feasibility of this scenario and determine a lower limit on the luminosity of the downward TGF from the perspective of gamma ray timing uncertainties, TGF Monte Carlo simulations, and meteorological analysis of a model storm cell and its possible charge structure altitudes. We determined that the most likely source altitude of the TGF reverse beam was 7.5 km ± 2.6 km, just below an estimated negative charge center at 8 km. At that altitude, the Monte Carlo simulations indicate a lower luminosity limit of 2 × 1018photons above 1 MeV for the main downward beam of the TGF, making the reverse beam detectable by the Fermi Gamma ray Burst Monitor.more » « less
-
Abstract We report on the mountain top observation of three terrestrial gamma‐ray flashes (TGFs) that occurred during the summer storm season of 2021. To our knowledge, these are the first TGFs observed in a mountaintop environment and the first published European TGFs observed from the ground. A gamma‐ray sensitive detector was located at the base of the Säntis Tower in Switzerland and observed three unique TGF events with coincident radio sferic data characteristic of TGFs seen from space. We will show an example of a “slow pulse” radio signature (Cummer et al., 2011,https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048099; Lu et al., 2011,https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA016141; Pu et al., 2019,https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082743; Pu et al., 2020,https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089427), a −EIP (Lyu et al., 2016,https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070154; Lyu et al., 2021,https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093627; Wada et al., 2020,https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031730), and a double peak TGF associated with an extraordinarily powerful and complicated positive‐polarity sferic, where each TGF peak is possibly preceded by a short burst of stepped leader emission.more » « less
-
Abstract We have studied the vertical negative leader progression features and the charge structures of 13 typical winter lightning flashes that produced downward terrestrial gamma‐ray flashes (TGFs). All these flashes started at altitudes below 1.5 km with an initial downward negative leader that propagates at a speed ranging from 1.3 to 4.5 × 106 m/s, followed by a strong negative return stroke called “energetic compact stroke” (ECS). After the ECS, usually there exists a radio quiet period lasting more than 10 ms. Interestingly, for more than half of the cases, soon after the resumed activities, an upward negative leader occurred at a position close to the lightning initiation point. Most of TGF lightning occurred under a main negative charge layer at the height of around 2 km. This negative charge layer is usually featured with a thickness of less than 2 km and a horizontal extension of more than 10 km.more » « less
-
In this study, we analyze 44 terrestrial gamma-ray flashes (TGFs) detected by the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) occurring in 2014–2016 in conjunction with data from the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN). We examine the characteristics of magnetic field waveforms measured by NLDN sensors for 61 pulses that occurred within 5 ms of the start-time of the TGF photon flux. For 21 (out of 44) TGFs, the associated NLDN pulse occurred almost simultaneously with (that is, within 200 μs of) the TGF. One TGF had two NLDN pulses within 200 μs. The median absolute time interval between the beginning of these near-simultaneous pulses and the TGF flux start-time is 50 μs. We speculate that these RF pulses are signatures of either TGF-associated relativistic electron avalanches or currents traveling in conducting paths “preconditioned” by TGF-associated electron beams. Compared to pulses that were not simultaneous with TGFs (but within 5 ms of one), simultaneous pulses had higher median absolute peak current (26 kA versus 11 kA), longer median threshold-to-peak rise time (14 μs versus 2.8 μs), and longer median peak-to-zero time (15 μs versus 5.5 μs). A majority (77%) of our simultaneous RF pulses had NLDN-estimated peak currents less than 50 kA indicating that TGF emissions can be associated with moderate-peak-amplitude processes. The lightning flash associated with one of the TGFs in our data set was observed by a Lightning Mapping Array, which reported a relatively high-power source at an altitude of 25 km occurring 101 μs after the GBM-reported TGF discovery-bin start-time.more » « less
