Search for: All records

Piracy and overproduction of hardware intellectual properties are growing concerns for the semiconductor industry under the fabless paradigm. Although chip designers have attempted to secure their designs against these threats by means of logic locking and obfuscation, due to the increasing number of powerful oracle-guided attacks, they are facing an ever-increasing challenge in evaluating the security of their designs and their associated overhead. Especially while many so-called "provable" logic locking techniques are subjected to a novel attack surface, overcoming these attacks may impose a huge overhead on the circuit. Thus, in this paper, after investigating the shortcoming of state-of-the-art graph neural network models in logic locking and refuting the use of hamming distance as a proper key accuracy metric, we employ two machine learning models, a decision tree to predict the security degree of the locked benchmarks and a convolutional neural network to assign a low-overhead and secure locking scheme to a given circuit. We first build multi-label datasets by running different attacks on locked benchmarks with existing logic locking methods to evaluate the security and compute the imposed area overhead. Then, we design and train a decision tree model to learn the features of the created dataset and predict the security degree of each given locked circuit. Furthermore, we utilize a convolutional neural network model to extract more features, obtain higher accuracy, and consider overhead. Then, we put our trained models to the test against different unseen benchmarks. The experimental results reveal that the convolutional neural network model has a higher capability for extracting features from unseen, large datasets which comes in handy in assigning secure and low-overhead logic locking to a given netlist. 

In a zero-trust fabless paradigm, designers are increasingly concerned about hardware-based attacks on the semiconductor supply chain. Logic locking is a design-for-trust method that adds extra key-controlled gates in the circuits to prevent hardware intellectual property theft and overproduction. While attackers have traditionally relied on an oracle to attack logic-locked circuits, machine learning attacks have shown the ability to retrieve the secret key even without access to an oracle. In this paper, we first examine the limitations of state-of-the-art machine learning attacks and argue that the use of key hamming distance as the sole model-guiding structural metric is not always useful. Then, we develop, train, and test a corruptibility-aware graph neural network-based oracle-less attack on logic locking that takes into consideration both the structure and the behavior of the circuits. Our model is explainable in the sense that we analyze what the machine learning model has interpreted in the training process and how it can perform a successful attack. Chip designers may find this information beneficial in securing their designs while avoiding incremental fixes. 

Chip designers can secure their ICs against piracy and overproduction by employing logic locking and obfuscation. However, there are numerous attacks that can examine the logic-locked netlist with the assistance of an activated IC and extract the correct key using a SAT solver. In addition, when it comes to fabrication, the imposed area overhead is a challenge that needs careful attention to preserve the design goals. Thus, to assign a logic locking method that can provide security against diverse attacks and at the same time add minimal area overhead, a comprehensive understanding of the circuit structure is needed. Towards this goal, in this paper, we first build a multi-label dataset by running different attacks on benchmarks locked with existing logic locking methods and various key sizes to capture the provided level of security and overhead for each benchmark. Then we propose and analyze CoLA, a convolutional neural network model that is trained on this dataset and thus is able to map circuits to secure low-overhead locking schemes by analyzing extracted features of the benchmark circuits. Considering various resynthesized versions of the same circuits empowers CoLA to learn features beyond the structure view alone. We use a quantization method that can lower the computation overhead of feature extraction in the classification of new, unseen data, hence speeding up the locking assignment process. Results on over 10,000 data show high accuracy both in the training and validation phases.