Search for: All records

Abstract Paleoclimate reconstructions are increasingly central to climate assessments, placing recent and future variability in a broader historical context. Paleoclimate reconstructions are increasingly central to climate assessments, placing recent and future variability in a broader historical context. Several estimation methods produce plumes of climate trajectories that practitioners often want to compare to other reconstruction ensembles, or to deterministic trajectories produced by other means, such as global climate models. Of particular interest are “offline” data assimilation (DA) methods, which have recently been adapted to paleoclimatology. Offline DA lacks an explicit model connecting time instants, so its ensemble members are not true system trajectories. This obscures quantitative comparisons, particularly when considering the ensemble mean in isolation. We propose several resampling methods to introduce a priori constraints on temporal behavior, as well as a general notion, called plume distance, to carry out quantitative comparisons between collections of climate trajectories (“plumes”). The plume distance provides a norm in the same physical units as the variable of interest (e.g. °C for temperature), and lends itself to assessments of statistical significance. We apply these tools to four paleoclimate comparisons: (1) global mean surface temperature (GMST) in the online and offline versions of the Last Millennium Reanalysis (v2.1); (2) GMST from these two ensembles to simulations of the Paleoclimate Model Intercomparison Project past1000 ensemble; (3) LMRv2.1 to the PAGES 2k (2019) ensemble of GMST and (4) northern hemisphere mean surface temperature from LMR v2.1 to the Büntgen et al. (2021) ensemble. Results generally show more compatibility between these ensembles than is visually apparent. The proposed methodology is implemented in an open-source Python package, and we discuss possible applications of the plume distance framework beyond paleoclimatology. 

Reconstructions of past climates in both time and space provide important insight into the range and rate of change within the climate system. However, producing a coherent global picture of past climates is difficult because indicators of past environmental changes (proxy data) are unevenly distributed and uncertain. In recent years, paleoclimate data assimilation (paleoDA), which statistically combines model simulations with proxy data, has become an increasingly popular reconstruction method. Here, we describe advances in paleoDA to date, with a focus on the offline ensemble Kalman filter and the insights into climate change that this method affords. PaleoDA has considerable strengths in that it can blend multiple types of information while also propagating uncertainty. Drawbacks of the methodology include an overreliance on the climate model and variance loss. We conclude with an outlook on possible expansions and improvements in paleoDA that can be made in the upcoming years. 

Here, we show that the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) provides a stronger constraint on equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS), the global warming from increasing greenhouse gases, after accounting for temperature patterns. Feedbacks governing ECS depend on spatial patterns of surface temperature (“pattern effects”); hence, using the LGM to constrain future warming requires quantifying how temperature patterns produce different feedbacks during LGM cooling versus modern-day warming. Combining data assimilation reconstructions with atmospheric models, we show that the climate is more sensitive to LGM forcing because ice sheets amplify extratropical cooling where feedbacks are destabilizing. Accounting for LGM pattern effects yields a median modern-day ECS of 2.4°C, 66% range 1.7° to 3.5°C (1.4° to 5.0°C, 5 to 95%), from LGM evidence alone. Combining the LGM with other lines of evidence, the best estimate becomes 2.9°C, 66% range 2.4° to 3.5°C (2.1° to 4.1°C, 5 to 95%), substantially narrowing uncertainty compared to recent assessments.