skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Ashcroft, Ian"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. This work describes a method in which the digital image correlation (DIC) method and finite element analysis (FEA) were used to create a quasi-static mixed-mode fracture envelope for bonded joints consisting of 2024-T3 Al adherends and a tough structural epoxy adhesive. Symmetric and asymmetric versions of double cantilever beam, single-leg bend, and end-notched flexure tests are used to populate the mixed-mode fracture envelope with results at several mode mixities. Experiments are conducted in a universal testing machine while recording images for subsequent DIC analysis. Finite element analysis is used to implement cohesive zone models (CZMs) of the adhesive fracture and to account for plastic deformation of adherends. Mode I and mode II traction separation laws (TSLs) are determined from a property identification method with a Benzeggagh–Kenane mixed-mode coupling law used to model mixed-mode behavior. FEA results are shown to provide a good agreement to both the crosshead displacement and DIC data. The methods in this paper serve as a potential framework for future calibration of mixed-mode fracture envelopes for joints bonded with very tough adhesives that complicate assessment with traditional data analysis methods. 
    more » « less