Search for: All records

The remarkable success of the use of machine learning-based solutions for network security problems has been impeded by the developed ML models’ inability to maintain efficacy when used in different network environments exhibiting different network behaviors. This issue is commonly referred to as the generalizability problem of ML models. The community has recognized the critical role that training datasets play in this context and has developed various techniques to improve dataset curation to overcome this problem. Unfortunately, these methods are generally ill-suited or even counterproductive in the network security domain, where they often result in unrealistic or poor-quality datasets. To address this issue, we propose a new closed-loop ML pipeline that leverages explainable ML tools to guide the network data collection in an iterative fashion. To ensure the data’s realism and quality, we require that the new datasets should be endogenously collected in this iterative process, thus advocating for a gradual removal of data-related problems to improve model generalizability. To realize this capability, we develop a data-collection platform, netUnicorn, that takes inspiration from the classic “hourglass” model and is implemented as its “thin waist" to simplify data collection for different learning problems from diverse network environments. The proposed system decouples data-collection intents from the deployment mechanisms and disaggregates these high-level intents into smaller reusable, self-contained tasks. We demonstrate how netUnicorn simplifies collecting data for different learning problems from multiple network environments and how the proposed iterative data collection improves a model’s generalizability 

The application of the latest techniques from artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) to improve and automate the decision-making required for solving real-world network security and performance problems (NetAI, for short) has generated great excitement among networking researchers. However, network operators have remained very reluctant when it comes to deploying NetAIbased solutions in their production networks. In Part I of this manifesto, we argue that to gain the operators' trust, researchers will have to pursue a more scientific approach towards NetAI than in the past that endeavors the development of explainable and generalizable learning models. In this paper, we go one step further and posit that this opening up of NetAI research will require that the largely self-assured hubris about NetAI gives way to a healthy dose humility. Rather than continuing to extol the virtues and magic of black-box models that largely obfuscate the critical role of the utilized data play in training these models, concerted research efforts will be needed to design NetAI-driven agents or systems that can be expected to perform well when deployed in production settings and are also required to exhibit strong robustness properties when faced with ambiguous situations and real-world uncertainties. We describe one such effort that is aimed at developing a new ML pipeline for generating trained models that strive to meet these expectations and requirements. 

The application of the latest techniques from artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) to improve and automate the decision-making required for solving real-world network security and performance problems (NetAI, for short) has generated great excitement among networking researchers. However, network operators have remained very reluctant when it comes to deploying NetAI-based solutions in their production networks, mainly because the black-box nature of the underlying learning models forces operators to blindly trust these models without having any understanding of how they work, why they work, or when they don't work (and why not). Paraphrasing [1], we argue that to overcome this roadblock and ensure its future success in practice, NetAI has to get past its current stage of explorimentation, or the practice of poking around to see what happens and has to start employing tools of the scientific method. 

Several recent research efforts have proposed Machine Learning (ML)-based solutions that can detect complex patterns in network traffic for a wide range of network security problems. However, without understanding how these black-box models are making their decisions, network operators are reluctant to trust and deploy them in their production settings. One key reason for this reluctance is that these models are prone to the problem of underspecification, defined here as the failure to specify a model in adequate detail. Not unique to the network security domain, this problem manifests itself in ML models that exhibit unexpectedly poor behavior when deployed in real-world settings and has prompted growing interest in developing interpretable ML solutions (e.g., decision trees) for “explaining” to humans how a given black-box model makes its decisions. However, synthesizing such explainable models that capture a given black-box model’s decisions with high fidelity while also being practical (i.e., small enough in size for humans to comprehend) is challenging. In this paper, we focus on synthesizing high-fidelity and low-complexity decision trees to help network operators determine if their ML models suffer from the problem of underspecification. To this end, we present TRUSTEE, a framework that takes an existing ML model and training dataset generate a high-fidelity, easy-to-interpret decision tree, and associated trust report. Using published ML models that are fully reproducible, we show how practitioners can use TRUSTEE to identify three common instances of model underspecification, i.e., evidence of shortcut learning, spurious correlations, and vulnerability to out-of-distribution samples.