Search for: All records

A centrifuge test (ODA01) was used as a proof-of-concept test to investigate the effect of vertical differential settlement on crack formation in a model levee. The Yolo loam embankment levee and its foundation were 250 mm and 62.5 mm high in prototype scale, respectively. Viscous pore fluid was used to simulate water behind the levee at a height of 225 mm and the test was conducted at 40g. The foundation of the levee included a moving part (a hydraulic table) and a non-moving part (a jointed wood table). The hydraulic actuators were extended to a maximum height of 25 mm before the start of the test. In the centrifuge, the hydraulic table was lowered to a maximum settlement of 25 mm to simulate the differential settlement of the levee. Hairline, transverse and longitudinal cracks were effectively induced in the levee through this vertical differential settlement. Furthermore, seepage flow was initiated through the cracks. The seepage flow stopped after some time without significant erosion, likely due to swelling of the soil around the crack and lowering of the upstream water level. 

Biogeotechnics, specifically bio-mediated and bio-inspired geotechnical engineering, has matured rapidly over the past two decades, becoming one of the fastest growing subdisciplines within geotechnical engineering. As typical in most science and engineering fields, biogeotechnics relies on data from physical experiments and field observations to advance technology. Obtaining field data to drive advancement can pose unique challenges, and in many cases may be cost or logistically prohibitive. Physical experiments or models are often preferable and may offer the sole feasible pathway for technology development and upscaling. Hypergravity scaled modeling using centrifuges has been instrumental in biogeotechnics development to support the building of basic science knowledge, the validation of computational and theoretical models, and the advancement of emerging technologies towards field implementation. 

This paper investigates and presents the numerical modeling and validation of the response of a uniform clean sand using monotonic and cyclic laboratory tests as well as a centrifuge model test comprised of a submerged slope. The dynamic response of the sand is modeled using a critical state compatible, stress ratio-based, bounding surface plasticity constitutive model (PM4Sand), implemented in the commercial finite-difference platform FLAC, and PM4Sand’s performance is evaluated against a comprehensive testing program comprised of laboratory data and a well-instrumented centrifuge model test. Three different calibrations informed by the lab and centrifuge data are performed and the goodness of the predictions is discussed. Conclusions are drawn with regards to the performance of the simulations against the laboratory and centrifuge data, and recommendations about the calibration of the model are provided.