Search for: All records

Code Large Language Models (Code LLMs) are being increasingly employed in real-life applications, so evaluating them is critical. While the conventional accuracy evaluates the performance of Code LLMs on a set of individual tasks, their self-consistency across different tasks is overlooked. Intuitively, a trustworthy model should be self-consistent when generating natural language specifications for its own code and generating code for its own specifications. Failure to preserve self-consistency reveals a lack of understanding of the shared semantics underlying natural language and programming language, and therefore undermines the trustworthiness of a model. In this paper, we first formally define the self-consistency of Code LLMs and then design a framework, IdentityChain, which effectively and efficiently evaluates the self-consistency and conventional accuracy of a model at the same time. We study eleven Code LLMs and show that they fail to preserve self-consistency, which is indeed a distinct aspect from conventional accuracy. Furthermore, we show that IdentityChain can be used as a model debugging tool to expose weaknesses of Code LLMs by demonstrating three major weaknesses that we identify in current models using IdentityChain. Our code is available at https://github.com/marcusm117/IdentityChain. 

Deep Learning (DL) models to analyze source code have shown immense promise during the past few years. More recently, self-supervised pre-training has gained traction for learning generic code representations valuable for many downstream SE tasks, such as clone and bug detection. While previous work successfully learned from different code abstractions (e.g., token, AST, graph), we argue that it is also essential to factor in how developers code day-to-day for general-purpose representation learning. On the one hand, human developers tend to write repetitive programs referencing existing code snippets from the current codebase or online resources (e.g., Stack Overflow website) rather than implementing functions from scratch; such behaviors result in a vast number of code clones. In contrast, a deviant clone by mistake might trigger malicious program behaviors. Thus, as a proxy to incorporate developers' coding behavior into the pre-training scheme, we propose to include code clones and their deviants. In particular, we propose CONCORD, a self-supervised, contrastive learning strategy to place benign clones closer in the representation space while moving deviants further apart. We show that CONCORD's clone-aware contrastive learning drastically reduces the need for expensive pre-training resources while improving the performance of downstream SE tasks. We also empirically demonstrate that CONCORD can improve existing pre-trained models to learn better representations that consequently become more efficient in both identifying semantically equivalent programs and differentiating buggy from non-buggy code.