Search for: All records

While Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) has achieved remarkable success across various domains, it remains vulnerable to occasional catastrophic failures without additional safeguards. An effective solution to prevent these failures is to use a shield that validates and adjusts the agent’s actions to ensure compliance with a provided set of safety specifications. For real-world robotic domains, it is essential to define safety specifications over continuous state and action spaces to accurately account for system dynamics and compute new actions that minimally deviate from the agent’s original decision. In this paper, we present the first shielding approach specifically designed to ensure the satisfaction of safety requirements in continuous state and action spaces, making it suitable for practical robotic applications. Our method builds upon realizability, an essential property that confirms the shield will always be able to generate a safe action for any state in the environment. We formally prove that realizability can be verified for stateful shields, enabling the incorporation of non-Markovian safety requirements, such as loop avoidance. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in ensuring safety without compromising the policy’s success rate by applying it to a navigation problem and a multi-agent particle environment1. Keywords: Shielding, Reinforcement Learning, Safety, Robotics 

In recent years, Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) has emerged as an effective approach to solving real-world tasks. However, despite their successes, DRL-based policies suffer from poor reliability, which limits their deployment in safety-critical domains. Various methods have been put forth to address this issue by providing formal safety guarantees. Two main approaches include shielding and verification. While shielding ensures the safe behavior of the policy by employing an external online component (i.e., a “shield”) that overrides potentially dangerous actions, this approach has a significant computational cost as the shield must be invoked at runtime to validate every decision. On the other hand, verification is an offline process that can identify policies that are unsafe, prior to their deployment, yet, without providing alternative actions when such a policy is deemed unsafe. In this work, we present verification-guided shielding — a novel approach that bridges the DRL reliability gap by integrating these two methods. Our approach combines both formal and probabilistic verification tools to partition the input domain into safe and unsafe regions. In addition, we employ clustering and symbolic representation procedures that compress the unsafe regions into a compact representation. This, in turn, allows to temporarily activate the shield solely in (potentially) unsafe regions, in an efficient manner. Our novel approach allows to significantly reduce runtime overhead while still preserving formal safety guarantees. We extensively evaluate our approach on two benchmarks from the robotic navigation domain, as well as provide an in-depth analysis of its scalability and completeness. 1