Search for: All records

Despite their structural similarities, ortho-phenylenes and 2,3-quinoxalinylenes (i.e., poly(quinoxaline-2,3-diyl)s), well known as foldamers and helical polymers, respectively, exhibit distinctly different conformational behavior. o-Phenylenes tend to fold into compact helices with every fourth ring stacked, whereas 2,3-quinoxalinylenes favor extended helices with no backbone stacking. To understand this difference, we have studied short o-arylenes with different sequences of benzene and pyrazine units. Through a combination of crystallography, variable-temperature NMR spectroscopy, and DFT calculations, we find that pyrazines favor extended helical conformations as a result of two effects. First, within an o-arylene architecture, pyrazines experience weaker arene–arene interactions. Cofacial packing of the rings is therefore less favorable. Second, bipyrazine units lead to an increase in vibrational entropy for extended conformers. Consequently, at higher temperatures (including room temperature), extended helices are favored for the heterocycle-containing systems. 

Foldamers, oligomers that adopt well‐defined conformations, represent an efficient strategy toward nanoscale structural complexity. While most foldamers fold into helices, many abiotic foldamers are built from achiral repeat units and therefore do not have a preferred twist sense. Their handedness can, however, be controlled by attaching groups with chirality centers to the foldamer backbone. This process allows chiral information from readily available compounds to be amplified into larger‐scale structural asymmetry and translated into functional behavior. This review describes mechanisms whereby the point chirality of chiral “controller” groups directs foldamer twist sense. We highlight examples of aromatic oligoamides, oligohydrazides, oligoindoles, oligo(ortho‐phenylenes), oligooxymethylenes, and oligo(aminoisobutyric acids), examining cases where the controller groups are attached at either the helices’ termini or sides. Our emphasis is on applying intuitive concepts from conformational analysis and, where appropriate, computational modeling of small substructures. In each case, we consider first short‐range interactions that orient the controller group relative to its direct point of attachment to the foldamer, and then its long‐range interactions with more‐distant parts of the oligomer. Together, these interactions allow the twist sense to be predicted (or at least rationalized). Understanding these mechanisms should facilitate the design of systems with dynamic control over helicity. 

Polymer networks crosslinked with spring-like ortho -phenylene ( o P) foldamers were developed. NMR analysis indicated the o P crosslinkers were well-folded. Polymer networks with o P-based crosslinkers showed enhanced energy dissipation and elasticity compared to divinylbenzene crosslinked networks. The energy dissipation was attributed to the strain-induced reversible unfolding of the o P units. Energy dissipation increased with the number of helical turns in the foldamer.