Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Free, publicly-accessible full text available December 1, 2026
-
Free, publicly-accessible full text available December 1, 2025
-
In this Letter, we report that the fourth-order interatomic force constants (4th-IFCs) are significantly sensitive to the energy surface roughness of exchange-correlation (XC) functionals in density functional theory calculations. This sensitivity, which is insignificant for the second- (2nd-) and third-order (3rd-) IFCs, varies for different functionals in different materials and can cause misprediction of thermal conductivity by several times of magnitude. As a result, when calculating the 4th-IFCs using the finite difference method, the atomic displacement needs to be taken large enough to overcome the energy surface roughness, in order to accurately predict phonon lifetime and thermal conductivity. We demonstrate this phenomenon on a benchmark material (Si), a high-thermal conductivity material (BAs), and a low thermal conductivity material (NaCl). For Si, we find that the LDA, PBE, and PBEsol XC functionals are all smooth to the 2nd- and 3rd-IFCs but all rough to the 4th-IFCs. This roughness can lead to a prediction of nearly one order of magnitude lower thermal conductivity. For BAs, all three functionals are smooth to the 2nd- and 3rd-IFCs, and only the PBEsol XC functional is rough for the 4th-IFCs, which leads to a 40% underestimation of thermal conductivity. For NaCl, all functionals are smooth to the 2nd- and 3rd-IFCs but rough to the 4th-IFCs, leading to a 70% underprediction of thermal conductivity at room temperature. With these observations, we provide general guidance on the calculation of 4th-IFCs for an accurate thermal conductivity prediction.more » « less
-
Silicon nitride (Si3N4) is a promising substrate for high-power electronics due to its superior mechanical properties and potential outstanding thermal conductivity (κ). As experiments keep pushing the upper limit of κ of Si3N4, it is believed that it can reach 450 W/mK, similar to SiC, based on classical models and molecular dynamics simulations. In this work, we reveal from first principles that the theoretical κ upper limits of β-Si3N4 are only 169 and 57 W/mK along the c and a axes at room temperature, respectively. Those of α-Si3N4 are about 116 and 87 W/mK, respectively. The predicted temperature-dependent κ matches well with the highest available experimental data, which supports the accuracy of our calculations, and suggests that the κ upper limit of Si3N4 has already been reached in the experiment. Compared to other promising semiconductors (e.g., SiC, AlN, and GaN), Si3N4 has a much lower κ than expected even though the chemical bonding and mechanical strengths are close or even stronger. We find the underlying reason is that Si3N4 has much lower phonon lifetimes and mean free paths (<0.5 μm) due to the larger three-phonon scattering phase space and stronger anharmonicity. Interestingly, we find that the larger unit cell (with more basis atoms) that leads to a smaller fraction of acoustic phonons is not the reason for lower κ. Grain size-dependent κ indicates that the grain boundary scattering plays a negligible role in most experimental samples. This work clarifies the theoretical κ upper limits of Si3N4 and can guide experimental research.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
