Search for: All records

Groundwater-surface water interaction (hyporheic exchange) is critical in numerous hydrogeochemical processes; however, hyporheic exchange is difficult to characterize due to the various spatial (e.g., sedimentary architecture) and temporal (e.g., stage fluctuations) variables that influence it. This interdisciplinary study brings forth novel insights by integrating various methodologies including geophysical surveys, physical and chemical sediment characterization, and water chemistry analysis to explore the interplay of the numerous facets governing hyporheic zone processes within a compound bar deposit. The findings reveal distinct sedimentary facies and geochemical zones within the compound bar, driven by the sedimentary architecture. Cross-bar channel fills are identified as critical structures influencing hydrogeochemical dynamics, acting as baffles to groundwater flow and modulating nutrient transformations. Geophysical imaging and hydrogeochemical analyses highlight the complex interplay between sediment characteristics and subsurface hydraulic connectivity, emphasizing the role of sediment heterogeneity in controlling hyporheic exchange and solute mixing. The study concludes that sediment heterogeneity, particularly the presence of cross-bar channel fills, plays a pivotal role in the hydrogeochemical dynamics of the hyporheic zone. These structures significantly influence hyporheic flow paths, solute residence times, and nutrient cycling, underscoring the necessity to consider the fine-scale sedimentary architecture in models of hyporheic exchange. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of riverine ecosystem processes, offering insights that can inform management strategies for water quality and ecological integrity. 

Rivers that cease to flow are globally prevalent. Although many epithets have been used for these rivers, a consensus on terminology has not yet been reached. Doing so would facilitate a marked increase in interdisciplinary interest as well as critical need for clear regulations. Here we reviewed literature from Web of Science database searches of 12 epithets to learn (Objective 1—O1) if epithet topics are consistent across Web of Science categories using latent Dirichlet allocation topic modeling. We also analyzed publication rates and topics over time to (O2) assess changes in epithet use. We compiled literature definitions to (O3) identify how epithets have been delineated and, lastly, suggest universal terms and definitions. We found a lack of consensus in epithet use between and among various fields. We also found that epithet usage has changed over time, as research focus has shifted from description to modeling. We conclude that multiple epithets are redundant. We offer specific definitions for three epithets (non-perennial, intermittent, and ephemeral) to guide consensus on epithet use. Limiting the number of epithets used in non-perennial river research can facilitate more effective communication among research fields and provide clear guidelines for writing regulatory documents.