Search for: All records

Abstract What proportion of integers$$n \leq N$$may be expressed as$$x^2 + dy^2$$for some$$d \leq \Delta $$, with$$x,y$$integers? Writing$$\Delta = (\log N)^{\log 2} 2^{\alpha \sqrt {\log \log N}}$$for some$$\alpha \in (-\infty , \infty )$$, we show that the answer is$$\Phi (\alpha ) + o(1)$$, where$$\Phi $$is the Gaussian distribution function$$\Phi (\alpha ) = \frac {1}{\sqrt {2\pi }} \int ^{\alpha }_{-\infty } e^{-x^2/2} dx$$. A consequence of this is a phase transition: Almost none of the integers$$n \leq N$$can be represented by$$x^2 + dy^2$$with$$d \leq (\log N)^{\log 2 - \varepsilon }$$, but almost all of them can be represented by$$x^2 + dy^2$$with$$d \leq (\log N)^{\log 2 + \varepsilon}\kern-1.5pt$$. 

Abstract The entropic doubling of a random variable taking values in an abelian group is a variant of the notion of the doubling constant of a finite subset of , but it enjoys somewhat better properties; for instance, it contracts upon applying a homomorphism. In this paper we develop further the theory of entropic doubling and give various applications, including: (1) A new proof of a result of Pálvölgyi and Zhelezov on the “skew dimension” of subsets of with small doubling; (2) A new proof, and an improvement, of a result of the second author on the dimension of subsets of with small doubling; (3) A proof that the Polynomial Freiman–Ruzsa conjecture over implies the (weak) Polynomial Freiman–Ruzsa conjecture over . 

Abstract We study the extent to which divisors of a typical integer n are concentrated. In particular, defining $$\Delta (n) := \max _t \# \{d | n, \log d \in [t,t+1]\}$$ Δ ( n ) : = max t # { d | n , log d ∈ [ t , t + 1 ] } , we show that $$\Delta (n) \geqslant (\log \log n)^{0.35332277\ldots }$$ Δ ( n ) ⩾ ( log log n ) 0.35332277 … for almost all n , a bound we believe to be sharp. This disproves a conjecture of Maier and Tenenbaum. We also prove analogs for the concentration of divisors of a random permutation and of a random polynomial over a finite field. Most of the paper is devoted to a study of the following much more combinatorial problem of independent interest. Pick a random set $${\textbf{A}} \subset {\mathbb {N}}$$ A ⊂ N by selecting i to lie in $${\textbf{A}}$$ A with probability 1/ i . What is the supremum of all exponents $$\beta _k$$ β k such that, almost surely as $$D \rightarrow \infty $$ D → ∞ , some integer is the sum of elements of $${\textbf{A}} \cap [D^{\beta _k}, D]$$ A ∩ [ D β k , D ] in k different ways? We characterise $$\beta _k$$ β k as the solution to a certain optimisation problem over measures on the discrete cube $$\{0,1\}^k$$ { 0 , 1 } k , and obtain lower bounds for $$\beta _k$$ β k which we believe to be asymptotically sharp. 

Many researchers and policymakers have expressed excitement about algorithmic explanations enabling more fair and responsible decision-making. However, recent experimental studies have found that explanations do not always improve human use of algorithmic advice. In this study, we shed light on how people interpret and respond to counterfactual explanations (CFEs)---explanations that show how a model's output would change with marginal changes to its input(s)---in the context of pretrial risk assessment instruments (PRAIs). We ran think-aloud trials with eight sitting U.S. state court judges, providing them with recommendations from a PRAI that includes CFEs. We found that the CFEs did not alter the judges' decisions. At first, judges misinterpreted the counterfactuals as real---rather than hypothetical---changes to defendants. Once judges understood what the counterfactuals meant, they ignored them, stating their role is only to make decisions regarding the actual defendant in question. The judges also expressed a mix of reasons for ignoring or following the advice of the PRAI without CFEs. These results add to the literature detailing the unexpected ways in which people respond to algorithms and explanations.They also highlight new challenges associated with improving human-algorithm collaborations through explanations.