Search for: All records

The existing quantitative geography literature contains a dearth of articles that span spatial autocorrelation (SA), a fundamental property of georeferenced data, and spatial optimization, a popular form of geographic analysis. The well-known location–allocation problem illustrates this state of affairs, although its empirical geographic distribution of demand virtually always exhibits positive SA. This latent redundant attribute information alludes to other tools that may well help to solve such spatial optimization problems in an improved, if not better than, heuristic way. Within a proof-of-concept perspective, this paper articulates connections between extensions of the renowned Majority Theorem of the minisum problem and especially the local indices of SA (LISA). The relationship articulation outlined here extends to the p = 2 setting linkages already established for the p = 1 spatial median problem. In addition, this paper presents the foundation for a novel extremely efficient p = 2 algorithm whose formulation demonstratively exploits spatial autocorrelation. 

Police patrolling intends to enhance traffic safety by mitigating the risks associated with vehicle crashes and accidents. From a view of operations, patrolling requires an effective distribution of resources and often involves area delineations for this distribution purpose. Given constraints such as budget and human resources for traffic safety, delineating geographic areas optimally for police patrol areas is an important agenda item. This paper considers two p-median location models using segments on a street network as observational units on which traffic issues such as vehicle crashes occur. It also uses two weight sets to construct an enhanced delineation of police patrol areas in the City of Plano, Texas. The first model for the standard p-median formulation gives attention to the cumulative number of motor vehicle crashes from 2011 to 2021 on the major transportation networks in Plano. The second model, an extension of this first p-median one, uses balancing constraints to achieve balanced spatial coverage across patrol areas. These two models are also solved with network kernel density count estimates (NKDCE) instead of crash counts. These smoothed densities on a network enable consideration of uncertainty affiliated with this aggregation. The analysis results of this paper suggest that the p-median models provide effective specifications, including their capability to define patrol areas that encompass the entire study region while minimizing distance costs. The inclusion of balancing constraints ensures a more equitable distribution of workloads among patrol areas, improving overall efficiency. Additionally, the model with NKDCE results in an improved workload balance among delineated areas for police patrolling activities, thus supporting more informed spatial decision-making processes for public safety. 

Both historically and in terms of practiced academic organization, the anticipation should be that a flourishing synergistic interface exists between statistics and operations research in general, and between spatial statistics/econometrics and spatial optimization in particular. Unfortunately, for the most part, this expectation is false. The purpose of this paper is to address this existential missing link by focusing on the beneficial contributions of spatial statistics to spatial optimization, via spatial autocorrelation (i.e., dis/similar attribute values tend to cluster together on a map), in order to encourage considerably more future collaboration and interaction between contributors to their two parent bodies of knowledge. The key basic statistical concept in this pursuit is the median in its bivariate form, with special reference to the global and to sets of regional spatial medians. One-dimensional examples illustrate situations that the narrative then extends to two-dimensional illustrations, which, in turn, connects these treatments to the spatial statistics centrography theme. Because of computational time constraints (reported results include some for timing experiments), the summarized analysis restricts attention to problems involving one global and two or three regional spatial medians. The fundamental and foundational spatial, statistical, conceptual tool employed here is spatial autocorrelation: geographically informed sampling designs—which acknowledge a non-random mixture of geographic demand weight values that manifests itself as local, homogeneous, spatial clusters of these values—can help spatial optimization techniques determine the spatial optima, at least for location-allocation problems. A valuable discovery by this study is that existing but ignored spatial autocorrelation latent in georeferenced demand point weights undermines spatial optimization algorithms. All in all, this paper should help initiate a dissipation of the existing isolation between statistics and operations research, hopefully inspiring substantially more collaborative work by their professionals in the future. 

Except for about a half dozen papers, virtually all (co)authored by Griffith, the existing literature lacks much content about the interface between spatial optimization, a popular form of geographic analysis, and spatial autocorrelation, a fundamental property of georeferenced data. The popularp‐median location‐allocation problem highlights this situation: the empirical geographic distribution of demand virtually always exhibits positive spatial autocorrelation. This property of geospatial data offers additional overlooked information for solving such spatial optimization problems when it actually relates to their solutions. With a proof‐of‐concept outlook, this paper articulates connections between the well‐known Majority Theorem of the 1‐median minisum problem and local indices of spatial autocorrelation; the LISA statistics appear to be the more useful of these later statistics because they better embrace negative spatial autocorrelation. The relationship articulation outlined here results in the positing of a new proposition labeled the egalitarian theorem.