Search for: All records

Improving our ability to understand and predict the dynamics of the terrestrial carbon cycle remains a pressing challenge despite a rapidly growing volume and diversity of Earth Observation data. State data assimilation represents a path forward via an iterative cycle of making process-based forecasts and then statistically reconciling these forecasts against numerous ground-based and remotely-sensed data constraints into a “reanalysis” data product that provides full spatiotemporal carbon budgets with robust uncertainty accounting. Here we report on an >100x expansion of the PEcAn+SIPNET reanalysis from 500 sites CONUS, 25 ensemble members, and 2 data constraints to 6400 sites across North America, 100 ensemble members, and 5 data constraints: GEDI and Landtrendr AGB, MODIS LAI, SoilGrids Soil C, and SMAP soil moisture. We also report on an ensemble-based machine learning (ML) downscaling to a 1km product that preserves spatial, temporal, and across-variable covariances and demonstrate the impacts of these covariances on uncertainty accounting (Fig. 1). Synergistically, we use the same ML models to assess what climate, vegetation, and soil variables explain the spatiotemporal variability in different C pools and fluxes. In addition, we review a wide range of ongoing validation activities, comparing the outputs of the reanalysis against withheld data from: Ameriflux and NEON NEE and LE; USFS Forest Inventory biomass, biomass increment, tree rings, soil C, and litter; and NEON soil C and soil respiration. Finally, we touch on ML analyses to diagnose and correct systematic biases and emulator-based recalibration efforts. 

Lipid vesicles immersed in solute gradients are predicted to migrate from regions of high to low solute concentration due to osmotic flows induced across their semipermeable membranes. This process─known as osmophoresis─is potentially relevant to biological processes such as vesicle trafficking and cell migration; however, there exist significant discrepancies (several orders of magnitude) between experimental observations and theoretical predictions for the vesicle speed. Here, we seek to reconcile predictions of osmophoresis with observations of vesicle motion in osmotic gradients. We prepare quasi-steady solute gradients in a microfluidic chamber using density-matched solutions of sucrose and glucose to eliminate buoyancy-driven flows. We quantify the motions of giant DLPC vesicles and Brownian tracer particles in such gradients using Bayesian analysis of particle tracking data. Despite efforts to mitigate convective flows, we observe directed motion of both lipid vesicles and tracer particles in a common direction at comparable speeds of order 10 nm/s. These observations are not inconsistent with models of osmophoresis, which predict slower motion at ca. 1 nm/s; however, experimental uncertainty and the confounding effects of fluid convection prohibit a quantitative comparison. In contrast to previous reports, we find no evidence for anomalously fast osmophoresis of lipid vesicles when fluid convection is mitigated and quantified. We discuss strategies for enhancing the speed of osmophoresis using high permeability membranes and geometric confinement. 

Microfluidic gradient generators are used to study the movement of living cells, lipid vesicles, and colloidal particles in response to spatial variations in their local chemical environment. Such gradient driven motions are often slow (less than 1 μm s −1 ) and therefore influenced or disrupted by fluid flows accompanying the formation and maintenance of the applied gradient. Even when external flows are carefully eliminated, the solute gradient itself can drive fluid motions due to combinations of gravitational body forces and diffusioosmotic surface forces. Here, we develop a microfluid gradient generator based on the in situ formation of biopolymer membranes and quantify the fluid flows induced by steady solute gradients. The measured velocity profiles agree quantitatively with those predicted by analytical approximations of relevant hydrodynamic models. We discuss how the speed of gradient-driven flows depends on system parameters such as the gradient magnitude, the fluid viscosity, the channel dimensions, and the solute type. These results are useful in identifying and mitigating undesired flows within microfluidic gradient systems.