Search for: All records

Structure-based virtual screening utilizes molecular docking to explore and analyze ligand–macromolecule interactions, crucial for identifying and developing potential drug candidates. Although there is availability of several widely used docking programs, the accurate prediction of binding affinity and binding mode still presents challenges. In this study, we introduced a novel protocol that combines our in-house geometry optimization algorithm, the conjugate gradient with backtracking line search (CG-BS), which is capable of restraining and constraining rotatable torsional angles and other geometric parameters with a highly accurate machine learning potential, ANI-2x, renowned for its precise molecular energy predictions reassembling the wB97X/6-31G(d) model. By integrating this protocol with binding pose prediction using the Glide, we conducted additional structural optimization and potential energy prediction on 11 small molecule–macromolecule and 12 peptide–macromolecule systems. We observed that ANI-2x/CG-BS greatly improved the docking power, not only optimizing binding poses more effectively, particularly when the RMSD of the predicted binding pose by Glide exceeded around 5 Å, but also achieving a 26% higher success rate in identifying those native-like binding poses at the top rank compared to Glide docking. As for the scoring and ranking powers, ANI-2x/CG-BS demonstrated an enhanced performance in predicting and ranking hundreds or thousands of ligands over Glide docking. For example, Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients remarkedly increased from 0.24 and 0.14 with Glide docking to 0.85 and 0.69, respectively, with the addition of ANI-2x/CG-BS for optimizing and ranking small molecules binding to the bacterial ribosomal aminoacyl-tRNA receptor. These results suggest that ANI-2x/CG-BS holds considerable potential for being integrated into virtual screening pipelines due to its enhanced docking performance.

 

The “Long-COVID syndrome” has posed significant challenges due to a lack of validated therapeutic options. We developed a novel multi-step virtual screening strategy to reliably identify inhibitors against 3-chymotrypsin-like protease of SARS-CoV-2 from abundant flavonoids, which represents a promising source of antiviral and immune-boosting nutrients. We identified 57 interacting residues as contributors to the protein-ligand binding pocket. Their energy interaction profiles constituted the input features for Machine Learning (ML) models. The consensus of 25 classifiers trained using various ML algorithms attained 93.9% accuracy and a 6.4% false-positive-rate. The consensus of 10 regression models for binding energy prediction also achieved a low root-mean-square error of 1.18 kcal/mol. We screened out 120 flavonoid hits first and retained 50 drug-like hits after predefined ADMET filtering to ensure bioavailability and safety profiles. Furthermore, molecular dynamics simulations prioritized nine bioactive flavonoids as promising anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents exhibiting both high structural stability (root-mean-square deviation < 5 Å for 218 ns) and low MM/PBSA binding free energy (<−6 kcal/mol). Among them, KB-2 (PubChem-CID, 14630497) and 9-O-Methylglyceofuran (PubChem-CID, 44257401) displayed excellent binding affinity and desirable pharmacokinetic capabilities. These compounds have great potential to serve as oral nutraceuticals with therapeutic and prophylactic properties as care strategies for patients with long-COVID syndrome.

 

Background: Tau assembly produces soluble oligomers and insoluble neurofibrillary tangles, which are neurotoxic to the brain and associated with Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. Therefore, preventing tau aggregation is a promising therapy for those neurodegenerative disorders. Objective: The aim of this study was to develop a joint computational/cell-based oligomerization protocol for screening inhibitors of tau assembly. Methods: Virtual oligomerization inhibition (VOI) experiment using molecular dynamics simulation was performed to screen potential oligomerization inhibitors of PHF6 hexapeptide. Tau seeding assay, which is directly related to the outcome of therapeutic intervention, was carried out to confirm a ligand’s ability in inhibiting tau assembly formation. Results: Our protocol was tested on two known compounds, EGCG and Blarcamesine. EGCG inhibited both the aggregation of PHF6 peptide in VOI and tau assembly in tau seeding assay, while Blarcamesine was not a good inhibitor at the two tasks. We also pointed out that good binding affinity to tau aggregates is needed, but not sufficient for a ligand to become a good inhibitor of tau oligomerization. Conclusion: VOI goes beyond traditional computational inhibitor screening of amyloid aggregation by directly examining the inhibitory ability of a ligand to tau oligomerization. Comparing with the traditional biochemical assays, tau seeding activities in cells is a better indicator for the outcome of a therapeutic intervention. Our hybrid protocol has been successfully validated. It can effectively and efficiently identify the inhibitors of amyloid oligomerization/aggregation processes, thus, facilitate to the drug development of tau-related neurodegenerative diseases. 

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) play an important role in regulating glutamate signal pathways, which are involved in neuropathy and periphery homeostasis. mGluR4, which belongs to Group III mGluRs, is most widely distributed in the periphery among all the mGluRs. It has been proved that the regulation of this receptor is involved in diabetes, colorectal carcinoma and many other diseases. However, the application of structure-based drug design to identify small molecules to regulate the mGluR4 receptor is limited due to the absence of a resolved mGluR4 protein structure. In this work, we first built a homology model of mGluR4 based on a crystal structure of mGluR8, and then conducted hierarchical virtual screening (HVS) to identify possible active ligands for mGluR4. The HVS protocol consists of three hierarchical filters including Glide docking, molecular dynamic (MD) simulation and binding free energy calculation. We successfully prioritized active ligands of mGluR4 from a set of screening compounds using HVS. The predicted active ligands based on binding affinities can almost cover all the experiment-determined active ligands, with only one ligand missed. The correlation between the measured and predicted binding affinities is significantly improved for the MM-PB/GBSA-WSAS methods compared to the Glide docking method. More importantly, we have identified hotspots for ligand binding, and we found that SER157 and GLY158 tend to contribute to the selectivity of mGluR4 ligands, while ALA154 and ALA155 could account for the ligand selectivity to mGluR8. We also recognized other 5 key residues that are critical for ligand potency. The difference of the binding profiles between mGluR4 and mGluR8 can guide us to develop more potent and selective modulators. Moreover, we evaluated the performance of IPSF, a novel type of scoring function trained by a machine learning algorithm on residue–ligand interaction profiles, in guiding drug lead optimization. The cross-validation root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) are much smaller than those by the endpoint methods, and the correlation coefficients are comparable to the best endpoint methods for both mGluRs. Thus, machine learning-based IPSF can be applied to guide lead optimization, albeit the total number of actives/inactives are not big, a typical scenario in drug discovery projects.