skip to main content

Explore Research Products in the NSF-PAR

  • NSF Public Access
  • Search Results
  • In silico binding affinity prediction for metabotropic glutamate receptors using both endpoint free energy methods and a machine learning-based scoring function
Title: In silico binding affinity prediction for metabotropic glutamate receptors using both endpoint free energy methods and a machine learning-based scoring function
Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) play an important role in regulating glutamate signal pathways, which are involved in neuropathy and periphery homeostasis. mGluR4, which belongs to Group III mGluRs, is most widely distributed in the periphery among all the mGluRs. It has been proved that the regulation of this receptor is involved in diabetes, colorectal carcinoma and many other diseases. However, the application of structure-based drug design to identify small molecules to regulate the mGluR4 receptor is limited due to the absence of a resolved mGluR4 protein structure. In this work, we first built a homology model of mGluR4 based on a crystal structure of mGluR8, and then conducted hierarchical virtual screening (HVS) to identify possible active ligands for mGluR4. The HVS protocol consists of three hierarchical filters including Glide docking, molecular dynamic (MD) simulation and binding free energy calculation. We successfully prioritized active ligands of mGluR4 from a set of screening compounds using HVS. The predicted active ligands based on binding affinities can almost cover all the experiment-determined active ligands, with only one ligand missed. The correlation between the measured and predicted binding affinities is significantly improved for the MM-PB/GBSA-WSAS methods compared to the Glide docking method. More importantly, we have identified hotspots for ligand binding, and we found that SER157 and GLY158 tend to contribute to the selectivity of mGluR4 ligands, while ALA154 and ALA155 could account for the ligand selectivity to mGluR8. We also recognized other 5 key residues that are critical for ligand potency. The difference of the binding profiles between mGluR4 and mGluR8 can guide us to develop more potent and selective modulators. Moreover, we evaluated the performance of IPSF, a novel type of scoring function trained by a machine learning algorithm on residue–ligand interaction profiles, in guiding drug lead optimization. The cross-validation root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) are much smaller than those by the endpoint methods, and the correlation coefficients are comparable to the best endpoint methods for both mGluRs. Thus, machine learning-based IPSF can be applied to guide lead optimization, albeit the total number of actives/inactives are not big, a typical scenario in drug discovery projects.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1955260
NSF-PAR ID:
10432632
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Volume:
24
Issue:
30
ISSN:
1463-9076
Page Range / eLocation ID:
18291 to 18305
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; ; ; ( , Journal of Cheminformatics)
    null (Ed.)
    Abstract In this study, we developed a novel algorithm to improve the screening performance of an arbitrary docking scoring function by recalibrating the docking score of a query compound based on its structure similarity with a set of training compounds, while the extra computational cost is neglectable. Two popular docking methods, Glide and AutoDock Vina were adopted as the original scoring functions to be processed with our new algorithm and similar improvement performance was achieved. Predicted binding affinities were compared against experimental data from ChEMBL and DUD-E databases. 11 representative drug receptors from diverse drug target categories were applied to evaluate the hybrid scoring function. The effects of four different fingerprints (FP2, FP3, FP4, and MACCS) and the four different compound similarity effect (CSE) functions were explored. Encouragingly, the screening performance was significantly improved for all 11 drug targets especially when CSE = S 4 (S is the Tanimoto structural similarity) and FP2 fingerprint were applied. The average predictive index (PI) values increased from 0.34 to 0.66 and 0.39 to 0.71 for the Glide and AutoDock vina scoring functions, respectively. To evaluate the performance of the calibration algorithm in drug lead identification, we also imposed an upper limit on the structural similarity to mimic the real scenario of screening diverse libraries for which query ligands are general-purpose screening compounds and they are not necessarily structurally similar to reference ligands. Encouragingly, we found our hybrid scoring function still outperformed the original docking scoring function. The hybrid scoring function was further evaluated using external datasets for two systems and we found the PI values increased from 0.24 to 0.46 and 0.14 to 0.42 for A2AR and CFX systems, respectively. In a conclusion, our calibration algorithm can significantly improve the virtual screening performance in both drug lead optimization and identification phases with neglectable computational cost. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; ( , Briefings in Bioinformatics)
    null (Ed.)
    Abstract Structure-based virtual screenings (SBVSs) play an important role in drug discovery projects. However, it is still a challenge to accurately predict the binding affinity of an arbitrary molecule binds to a drug target and prioritize top ligands from an SBVS. In this study, we developed a novel method, using ligand-residue interaction profiles (IPs) to construct machine learning (ML)-based prediction models, to significantly improve the screening performance in SBVSs. Such a kind of the prediction model is called an IP scoring function (IP-SF). We systematically investigated how to improve the performance of IP-SFs from many perspectives, including the sampling methods before interaction energy calculation and different ML algorithms. Using six drug targets with each having hundreds of known ligands, we conducted a critical evaluation on the developed IP-SFs. The IP-SFs employing a gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) algorithm in conjunction with the MIN + GB simulation protocol achieved the best overall performance. Its scoring power, ranking power and screening power significantly outperformed the Glide SF. First, compared with Glide, the average values of mean absolute error and root mean square error of GBDT/MIN + GB decreased about 38 and 36%, respectively. Second, the mean values of squared correlation coefficient and predictive index increased about 225 and 73%, respectively. Third, more encouragingly, the average value of the areas under the curve of receiver operating characteristic for six targets by GBDT, 0.87, is significantly better than that by Glide, which is only 0.71. Thus, we expected IP-SFs to have broad and promising applications in SBVSs. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ( , Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics)
    Methods which accurately predict protein – ligand binding strengths are critical for drug discovery. In the last two decades, advances in chemical modelling have enabled steadily accelerating progress in the discovery and optimization of structure-based drug design. Most computational methods currently used in this context are based on molecular mechanics force fields that often have deficiencies in describing the quantum mechanical (QM) aspects of molecular binding. In this study, we show the competitiveness of our QM-based Molecules-in-Molecules (MIM) fragmentation method for characterizing binding energy trends for seven different datasets of protein – ligand complexes. By using molecular fragmentation, the MIM method allows for accelerated QM calculations. We demonstrate that for classes of structurally similar ligands bound to a common receptor, MIM provides excellent correlation to experiment, surpassing the more popular Molecular Mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area (MM/PBSA) and Molecular Mechanics Generalized Born Surface Area (MM/GBSA) methods. The MIM method offers a relatively simple, well-defined protocol by which binding trends can be ascertained at the QM level and is suggested as a promising option for lead optimization in structure-based drug design. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ( , Nucleic Acids Research)
    Abstract

    With the progress of structural biology, the Protein Data Bank (PDB) has witnessed rapid accumulation of experimentally solved protein structures. Since many structures are determined with purification and crystallization additives that are unrelated to a protein's in vivo function, it is nontrivial to identify the subset of protein–ligand interactions that are biologically relevant. We developed the BioLiP2 database (https://zhanggroup.org/BioLiP) to extract biologically relevant protein–ligand interactions from the PDB database. BioLiP2 assesses the functional relevance of the ligands by geometric rules and experimental literature validations. The ligand binding information is further enriched with other function annotations, including Enzyme Commission numbers, Gene Ontology terms, catalytic sites, and binding affinities collected from other databases and a manual literature survey. Compared to its predecessor BioLiP, BioLiP2 offers significantly greater coverage of nucleic acid-protein interactions, and interactions involving large complexes that are unavailable in PDB format. BioLiP2 also integrates cutting-edge structural alignment algorithms with state-of-the-art structure prediction techniques, which for the first time enables composite protein structure and sequence-based searching and significantly enhances the usefulness of the database in structure-based function annotations. With these new developments, BioLiP2 will continue to be an important and comprehensive database for docking, virtual screening, and structure-based protein function analyses.

     
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al ( , Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics)
    Abstract

    In the ligand prediction category of CASP15, the challenge was to predict the positions and conformations of small molecules binding to proteins that were provided as amino acid sequences or as models generated by the AlphaFold2 program. For most targets, we used our template‐based ligand docking program ClusPro ligTBM, also implemented as a public server available athttps://ligtbm.cluspro.org/. Since many targets had multiple chains and a number of ligands, several templates, and some manual interventions were required. In a few cases, no templates were found, and we had to use direct docking using the Glide program. Nevertheless, ligTBM was shown to be a very useful tool, and by any ranking criteria, our group was ranked among the top five best‐performing teams. In fact, all the best groups used template‐based docking methods. Thus, it appears that the AlphaFold2‐generated models, despite the high accuracy of the predicted backbone, have local differences from the x‐ray structure that make the use of direct docking methods more challenging. The results of CASP15 confirm that this limitation can be frequently overcome by homology‐based docking.

     
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email