Search for: All records

Abstract Within Earth's critical zone, weathering processes influence landscape evolution and hillslope hydrology by creating porosity in bedrock, transforming it into saprolite and eventually soil. In situ weathering processes drive much of this transformation while preserving the rock fabric of the parent material. Inherited rock fabric in regolith makes the critical zone anisotropic, affecting its mechanical and hydrological properties. Therefore, quantifying and studying anisotropy is an important part of characterising the critical zone, yet doing so remains challenging. Seismic methods can be used to detect rock fabric and infer mechanical and hydrologic conductivity anisotropy across landscapes. We present a novel way of measuring seismic anisotropy in the critical zone using Rayleigh and Love surface waves. This method leverages multi‐component surface seismic data to create a high‐resolution model of seismic anisotropy, which we compare with a nuclear magnetic resonance log measured in a nearby borehole. The two geophysical data sets show that seismic anisotropy and porosity develop at similar depths in weathered bedrock and both reach their maximum values in saprolite, implying that in situ weathering enhances anisotropy while concurrently generating porosity in the critical zone. We bolster our findings with in situ measurements of seismic and hydrologic conductivity anisotropy made in a 3 m deep soil excavation. Our study offers a fresh perspective on the importance of rock fabric in the development and function of the critical zone and sheds new insights into how weathering processes operate. 

Physical, chemical, and biological processes create and maintain the critical zone (CZ). In weathered and crystalline rocks, these processes occur over 10–100 s of meters and transform bedrock into soil. The CZ provides pore space and flow paths for groundwater, supplies nutrients for ecosystems, and provides the foundation for life. Vegetation in the aboveground CZ depends on these components and actively mediates Earth system processes like evapotranspiration, nutrient and water cycling, and hill slope erosion. Therefore, the vertical and lateral extent of the CZ can provide insight into the important chemical and physical processes that link life on the surface with geology 10–100 s meters below. In this study, we present 3.9 km of seismic refraction data in a weathered and crystalline granite in the Laramie Range, Wyoming. The refraction data were collected to investigate two ridges with clear contrasts in vegetation and slope. Given the large contrasts in slope, aspect, and vegetation cover, we expected large differences in CZ structure. However, our results suggest no significant differences in large-scale (>10 s of m) CZ structure as a function of slope or aspect. Our data appears to suggest a relationship between LiDAR-derived canopy height and depth to fractured bedrock where the tallest trees are located over regions with the shallowest depth to fractured bedrock. After separating our data by the presence or lack of vegetation, higher P-wave velocities under vegetation is likely a result of higher saturation. 

Fractures in Earth's critical zone influence groundwater flow and storage and promote chemical weathering. Fractured materials are difficult to characterize on large spatial scales because they contain fractures that span a range of sizes, have complex spatial distributions, and are often inaccessible. Therefore, geophysical characterizations of the critical zone depend on the scale of measurements and on the response of the medium to impulses at that scale. Using P-wave velocities collected at two scales, we show that seismic velocities in the fractured bedrock layer of the critical zone are scale-dependent. The smaller-scale velocities, derived from sonic logs with a dominant wavelength of ~0.3 m, show substantial vertical and lateral heterogeneity in the fractured rock, with sonic velocities varying by 2,000 m/s over short lateral distances (~20 m), indicating strong spatial variations in fracture density. In contrast, the larger-scale velocities, derived from seismic refraction surveys with a dominant wavelength of ~50 m, are notably slower than the sonic velocities (a difference of ~3,000 m/s) and lack lateral heterogeneity. We show that this discrepancy is a consequence of contrasting measurement scales between the two methods; in other words, the contrast is not an artifact but rather information—the signature of a fractured medium (weathered/fractured bedrock) when probed at vastly different scales. We explore the sample volumes of each measurement and show that surface refraction velocities provide reliable estimates of critical zone thickness but are relatively insensitive to lateral changes in fracture density at scales of a few tens of meters. At depth, converging refraction and sonic velocities likely indicate the top of unweathered bedrock, indicative of material with similar fracture density across scales.