Search for: All records

Seismic waves with different propagation and oscillation directions can exhibit different velocities when going through a medium with some directional properties; this phenomenon is called seismic anisotropy. Seismic anisotropy observed beneath eastern North America is often attributed to present-day flow in the upper mantle. The mantle flow causes shear waves oscillating in the direction of flow (e.g., in the direction of North America plate motion) to travel faster than those that travel in other directions. However, this pattern does not hold true for some regions along the Appalachian orogen, suggesting that past tectonic events can result in long-lived, ‘frozen-in’ anisotropy in the lithosphere, which modifies the predicted anisotropic behavior beneath these regions. In this study, we investigate sources of seismic anisotropy beneath southern New England using a method based on directionally dependent variations of P-wave to S-wave conversions at interfaces with contrasts in anisotropy. This method can separate signals caused by different anisotropic features and constrain the depth distribution of anisotropy. Within the crust there are multiple features that may be correlated with stratification in the Hartford Basin, faults in the Taconic thrust belt, shear zones formed during Salinic/Acadian terrane accretion events, and orogen-parallel crustal flow in the Acadian orogenic plateau. We apply a Bayesian inversion method to obtain quantitative constraints on the direction and strength of intra-crustal anisotropy beneath the Hartford Basin. In the upper mantle, we identify a fossil shear zone possibly formed during oblique subduction of Rheic Ocean lithosphere. We also find evidence for a plate motion-parallel flow zone in the asthenosphere that is likely disturbed by mantle upwelling near the southern margin of the Northern Appalachian Anomaly in the eastern part of the study area. 

We present results of integrated 40Ar/39Ar geochronology and microstructural analyses of samples from Taconic thrust faults of the northern New England Appalachians that provide evidence for reactivation during the Acadian, Neo-Acadian, and Alleghenian orogenies. 40Ar/39Ar ages c. 420 Ma from western frontal thrusts of the Green Mountains and Berkshire Massif have been interpreted previously to reflect partial resetting of Taconic ages during Acadian metamorphism. In Massachusetts and southern Vermont, these W-directed thrusts transport Grenville basement and its cover sequences over Cambrian-to-Ordovician phyllites and graphitic schists. Our recent investigations of these faults, however, yield a suite of c. 420 Ma 40Ar/39Ar ages obtained from syn-tectonic mica in mylonites and footwall schist/phyllite that are interpreted, rather, to reflect a pulse of W-directed thrusting. This interpretation that these ages record the timing of deformation is based, in part, on the preservation of quartz and feldspar dislocation creep microstructures (i.e., lack of evidence for static recrystallization), as well as the regional distribution of these data relative to Acadian metamorphic isograds. These results align with recent findings for the timing of formation of the Green Mountain Anticlinorium in northern Vermont, as well as detrital zircon data that require isolation of the Catskill Basin from the Connecticut Valley-Gaspe Basin (CVGB) at the onset of deposition around that time. Mylonites and samples from the adjacent footwall schists and phyllites also locally record evidence for minor to wholesale resetting c. 355 Ma associated with a younger phase of ductile deformation. Further evidence for partial resetting of 40Ar/39Ar ages c. 250 is associated with hematite-rich seams parallel to the mylonitic foliation and cross-cutting fractures. We explore how these age populations relate to those obtained from, for example, the CVGB and Chester and Athens Domes, and their implications for correlating surface geology with results from seismic imaging of the lithospheric and mantle structure in the northern New England Appalachians. 

The New England Appalachians provide a fascinating window into a host of fundamental geological problems. These include the modification of crustal and mantle lithospheric structure via orogenesis, terrane accretion, and continental rifting, the evolution of individual terranes through processes such as channel flow and ductile extrusion, and the causes and consequences of the Northern Appalachian Anomaly (NAA), a prominent geophysical anomaly in the upper mantle. Recent and ongoing deployments of dense seismic arrays in New England are providing images of the crust and upper mantle in unprecedented detail, allowing us to address both new and longstanding science questions. These deployments include the Seismic Experiment for Imaging Structure beneath Connecticut (SEISConn, 2015-2019), the New England Seismic Transects (NEST, 2018-present), and the GEology of New England via Seismic Imaging Studies (GENESIS, 2022-present) arrays. Here we present results from these experiments that are shedding new light on the tectonic evolution of New England and the ways in which structures and processes in the upper mantle can affect the structure of the overlying lithosphere. These include detailed new images of crustal architecture beneath central and southern New England, including a sharp transition from thick (~48 km) crust Laurentia terranes to thin (~32 km) crust beneath Appalachian terranes. The character of this offset beneath the SEISConn and NEST arrays suggests an overlap of two Moho boundaries, forming an overthrust-type structure that may have resulted from reactivation of faults during the compression and shortening associated with the formation of the hypothesized Acadian Altiplano. Beneath SEISConn, there is evidence for multiple relict structures preserved in the lithosphere from past episodes of terrane accretion and suturing, as well as anisotropic layering that constrains the kinematics of past lithospheric deformation events. Beneath the NEST line in central New England, we infer a relatively shallow (~80 km) lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary above the NAA upper mantle geophysical anomaly, providing evidence for lithospheric thinning above a presumed asthenospheric upwelling. Finally, preliminary results suggest layered crustal anisotropy beneath the GENESIS array, perhaps corresponding to a past episode of channel flow in the mid-crust.