Search for: All records

Abstract DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are formed in meiosis, so their repair in the homologous recombination (HR) pathway will lead to crossover formation, which is essential for successful chromosome segregation. HR contains 2 subpathways: synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA) that creates noncrossover and double Holliday junction (dHJ) that generates crossovers. RAD-51 is a protein essential to the formation of all products of HR, as it assembles on the processed DSB, allowing the invasion of the single-stranded DNA into a region of homology. RAD-51 is removed by RAD-54.L after invasion to allow for repair to occur. Here, we investigate a separation of function allele of rad-51, rad-51::FLAG, as compared to 2 other RAD-51 alleles: rad-51::degron and GFP::rad-51. rad-51::FLAG displays slowed repair kinetics, resulting in an accumulation of RAD-51 foci. rad-51::FLAG worms also activate the DSB checkpoint, but to a less extant than that of rad-51 null mutants. In a proximity ligation assay, RAD-54.L and RAD-51 show enriched colocalization in rad-51::FLAG germlines (but not in rad-51::degron), consistent with stalling at the strand invasion step in HR. The defects in RAD-51 disassembly in rad-51::FLAG mutants lead to formation of chromosomal fragments, similar in their magnitude to ones observed in rad-51 or rad-54.L null mutants. However, rad-51::FLAG mutants (unlike a rad-51 null, GFP::rad-51 or rad-54.L null mutants) displayed no defects in the formation of crossover-designated sites (via GFP::COSA-1 localization). Given that rad-51::FLAG worms show checkpoint activation and chromosomal fragments, these results suggest that crossover repair concludes normally, while the noncrossover pathway is perturbed. This is strikingly different from rad-51::degron and GFP::rad-51 strains, which are proficient or deficient in both pathways, respectively. These results suggest that noncrossovers vs crossovers have distinct recombination intermediates and diverge prior to RAD-51 disassembly. 

From bacterial quorum sensing to human language, communication is essential for social interactions. Nematodes produce and sense pheromones to communicate among individuals and respond to environmental changes. These signals are encoded by different types and mixtures of ascarosides, whose modular structures further enhance the diversity of this nematode pheromone language. Interspecific and intraspecific differences in this ascaroside pheromone language have been described previously, but the genetic basis and molecular mechanisms underlying the variation remain largely unknown. Here, we analyzed natural variation in the production of 44 ascarosides across 95 wild Caenorhabditis elegans strains using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry. We discovered wild strains defective in the production of specific subsets of ascarosides ( e.g. , the aggregation pheromone icas#9) or short- and medium-chain ascarosides, as well as inversely correlated patterns between the production of two major classes of ascarosides. We investigated genetic variants that are significantly associated with the natural differences in the composition of the pheromone bouquet, including rare genetic variants in key enzymes participating in ascaroside biosynthesis, such as the peroxisomal 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase, daf-22 , and the carboxylesterase cest-3 . Genome-wide association mappings revealed genomic loci harboring common variants that affect ascaroside profiles. Our study yields a valuable dataset for investigating the genetic mechanisms underlying the evolution of chemical communication. 

Abstract Accumulation of DNA–RNA hybrids in the form of R-loops can result in replication–transcription conflict that leads to the formation of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). Using null mutants for the two Caenorhabditis elegans genes encoding for RNaseH1 and RNaseH2, we identify novel effects of R-loop accumulation in the germline. R-loop accumulation leads, as expected, to replication stress, followed by the formation of DSBs. A subset of these DSBs are irreparable. However, unlike irreparable DSBs generated in other systems, which trigger permanent cell cycle arrest, germline irreparable DSBs are propagated to oocytes. Despite DNA damage checkpoint activation in the stem cell niche, the signaling cannot be sustained and nuclei with irreparable DNA damage progress into meiosis. Moreover, unlike other forms of DNA damage that increase germline apoptosis, R-loop-generated DSBs remain undetected by the apoptotic checkpoint. This coincides with attenuation of ATM/ATR signaling in mid-to-late meiotic prophase I. These data altogether indicate that in the germline, DSBs that are generated by R-loops can lead to irreparable DSBs that evade cellular machineries designed for damage recognition. These studies implicate germline R-loops as an especially dangerous driver of germline mutagenesis.