Search for: All records

Abstract Global environmental change is causing a decline in biodiversity with profound implications for ecosystem functioning and stability. It remains unclear how global change factors interact to influence the effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning and stability. Here, using data from a 24-year experiment, we investigate the impacts of nitrogen (N) addition, enriched CO₂(eCO₂), and their interactions on the biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationship (complementarity effects and selection effects), the biodiversity-ecosystem stability relationship (species asynchrony and species stability), and their connections. We show that biodiversity remains positively related to both ecosystem productivity (functioning) and its stability under N addition and eCO₂. However, the combination of N addition and eCO₂diminishes the effects of biodiversity on complementarity and selection effects. In contrast, N addition and eCO₂do not alter the relationship between biodiversity and either species asynchrony or species stability. Under ambient conditions, both complementarity and selection effects are negatively related to species asynchrony, but neither are related to species stability; these links persist under N addition and eCO₂. Our study offers insights into the underlying processes that sustain functioning and stability of biodiverse ecosystems in the face of global change. 

ABSTRACT Biodiversity promotes ecosystem productivity and stability, positive impacts that often strengthen over time. But ongoing global changes such as rising atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO₂) levels and anthropogenic nitrogen (N) deposition may modulate the impact of biodiversity on ecosystem productivity and stability over time. Using a quarter‐century grassland biodiversity‐global change experiment we show that diversity increasingly enhanced productivity over time irrespective of global change treatments. In contrast, the positive influence of diversity on ecosystem stability strengthened over time under ambient conditions but weakened to varying degrees under global change treatments, largely driven by a greater reduction in species asynchrony under global changes. Thus, over 25 years, CO₂and N enrichment gradually eroded some of the positive effects of biodiversity on ecosystem stability. As elevated CO₂, N eutrophication, and biodiversity loss increasingly co‐occur in grasslands globally, our results raise concerns about their potential joint detrimental effects on long‐term grassland stability. 

Abstract Global changes such as nitrogen (N) enrichment and elevated carbon dioxide (CO₂) are known to exacerbate biodiversity loss in grassland ecosystems. They do so by modifying processes whose strength may vary at different spatial scales. Yet, whether and how global changes impact plant diversity at different spatial scales remains elusive.We collected data on species presence and cover at a high resolution in the third decade of a long‐term temperate grassland biodiversity—global change experiment. Based on the data, we constructed species—area relationships across three spatial orders of magnitude (from 0.01 to 3.24 m²) and compared them for the different global change treatments.We found that N enrichment, both under ambient and elevated CO₂levels, decreased species richness across almost all spatial scales, with proportional decreases being largest at the smallest spatial scales. Elevated CO₂also reduced richness at both ambient and enriched N supply rates but did so proportionally across all spatial scales. Suppression of diversity was stronger at all scales for diversity indices that include relative abundances than for species richness. Taken together, these results suggest that CO₂and N are re‐organizing this grassland system by increasingly favouring, at fine scales, a small subset of dominant species.Synthesis: Our results highlight the role of spatial scales in influencing biodiversity loss, especially when it is driven by anthropogenic resource changes that might influence species interactions differently across spatial scales. 

Abstract Plant functional groups (FGs) differ in their response to global changes, although species within those groups also vary in such responses. Both species and FG responses to global change are likely influenced by species interactions such as inter‐specific competition and facilitation, which are prevalent in species mixtures but not monocultures. As most studies focus on responses of plants growing in either monocultures or mixtures, but rarely both, it remains unclear how interspecific interactions in diverse ecological communities, especially among species in different FGs, modify FG responses to global changes. To address these issues, we leveraged data from a 16‐species, 24‐year perennial grassland experiment to examine plant FG biomass responses to atmospheric CO₂, and N inputs at different planted diversity. FGs differed in their responses to N and CO₂treatments in monocultures. Such differences were amplified in mixtures, where N enrichment strongly increased C3 grass success at ambient CO₂and C4 grass success at elevated CO₂. Legumes declined with N enrichment in mixtures at both CO₂levels and increased with elevated CO₂in the initial years of the experiment. Our results suggest that previous studies that considered responses to global changes in monocultures may underestimate biomass changes in diverse communities where interspecific interactions can amplify responses. Such effects of interspecific interactions on responses of FGs to global change may impact community composition over time and consequently influence ecosystem functions. 

Abstract Fire and herbivory interact to alter ecosystems and carbon cycling. In savannas, herbivores can reduce fire activity by removing grass biomass, but the size of these effects and what regulates them remain uncertain. To examine grazing effects on fuels and fire regimes across African savannas, we combined data from herbivore exclosure experiments with remotely sensed data on fire activity and herbivore density. We show that, broadly across African savannas, grazing herbivores substantially reduce both herbaceous biomass and fire activity. The size of these effects was strongly associated with grazing herbivore densities, and surprisingly, was mostly consistent across different environments. A one‐zebra increase in herbivore biomass density (~100 kg/km²of metabolic biomass) resulted in a ~53 kg/ha reduction in standing herbaceous biomass and a ~0.43 percentage point reduction in burned area. Our results indicate that fire models can be improved by incorporating grazing effects on grass biomass.