skip to main content


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Nelakuditi, Srihari"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Free, publicly-accessible full text available December 1, 2025
  2. Free, publicly-accessible full text available June 3, 2025
  3. Abstract Study Objectives

    Evaluate wrist-placed accelerometry predicted heartrate compared to electrocardiogram (ECG) heartrate in children during sleep.

    Methods

    Children (n=82, 61% male, 43.9% Black) wore a wrist-placed Apple Watch Series 7 (AWS7) and ActiGraph GT9X during a polysomnogram. 3-Axis accelerometry data was extracted from AWS7 and the GT9X. Accelerometry heartrate estimates were derived from jerk (the rate of acceleration change), computed using the peak magnitude frequency in short time Fourier Transforms of Hilbert transformed jerk computed from acceleration magnitude. Heartrates from ECG traces were estimated from R-R intervals using R-pulse detection. Lin’s Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC), mean absolute error (MAE) and mean absolute percent error (MAPE) assessed agreement with ECG estimated heartrate. Secondary analyses explored agreement by polysomnography sleep stage and a signal quality metric.

    Results

    The developed scripts are available on Github. For the GT9X, CCC was poor at -0.11 and MAE and MAPE were high at 16.8 (SD=14.2) beats/minute and 20.4% (SD=18.5%). For AWS7, CCC was moderate at 0.61 while MAE and MAPE were lower at 6.4 (SD=9.9) beats/minute and 7.3% (SD=10.3%). Accelerometry estimated heartrate for AWS7 was more closely related to ECG heartrate during N2, N3 and REM sleep than lights on, wake, and N1 and when signal quality was high. These patterns were not evident for the GT9X.

    Conclusions

    Raw accelerometry data extracted from AWS7, but not the GT9X, can be used to estimate heartrate in children while they sleep. Future work is needed to explore the sources (i.e., hardware, software, etc.) of the GT9X’s poor performance.

     
    more » « less
    Free, publicly-accessible full text available May 3, 2025
  4. Yamada, Yosuke (Ed.)

    The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the raw accelerometry output from research-grade and consumer wearable devices compared to accelerations produced by a mechanical shaker table. Raw accelerometry data from a total of 40 devices (i.e., n = 10 ActiGraph wGT3X-BT, n = 10 Apple Watch Series 7, n = 10 Garmin Vivoactive 4S, and n = 10 Fitbit Sense) were compared to reference accelerations produced by an orbital shaker table at speeds ranging from 0.6 Hz (4.4 milligravity-mg) to 3.2 Hz (124.7mg). Two-way random effects absolute intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) tested inter-device reliability. Pearson product moment, Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), absolute error, mean bias, and equivalence testing were calculated to assess the validity between the raw estimates from the devices and the reference metric. Estimates from Apple, ActiGraph, Garmin, and Fitbit were reliable, with ICCs = 0.99, 0.97, 0.88, and 0.88, respectively. Estimates from ActiGraph, Apple, and Fitbit devices exhibited excellent concordance with the reference CCCs = 0.88, 0.83, and 0.85, respectively, while estimates from Garmin exhibited moderate concordance CCC = 0.59 based on the mean aggregation method. ActiGraph, Apple, and Fitbit produced similar absolute errors = 16.9mg, 21.6mg, and 22.0mg, respectively, while Garmin produced higher absolute error = 32.5mg compared to the reference. ActiGraph produced the lowest mean bias 0.0mg (95%CI = -40.0, 41.0). Equivalence testing revealed raw accelerometry data from all devices were not statistically significantly within the equivalence bounds of the shaker speed. Findings from this study provide evidence that raw accelerometry data from Apple, Garmin, and Fitbit devices can be used to reliably estimate movement; however, no estimates were statistically significantly equivalent to the reference. Future studies could explore device-agnostic and harmonization methods for estimating physical activity using the raw accelerometry signals from the consumer wearables studied herein.

     
    more » « less
    Free, publicly-accessible full text available March 29, 2025
  5. mmWave signals form a critical component of 5G and next-generation wireless networks, which are also being increasingly considered for sensing the environment around us to enable ubiquitous IoT applications. In this context, this paper leverages the properties of mmWave signals for tracking 3D finger motion for interactive IoT applications. While conventional vision-based solutions break down under poor lighting, occlusions, and also suffer from privacy concerns, mmWave signals work under typical occlusions and non-line-of-sight conditions, while being privacy-preserving. In contrast to prior works on mmWave sensing that focus on predefined gesture classification, this work performs continuous 3D finger motion tracking. Towards this end, we first observe via simulations and experiments that the small size of fingers coupled with specular reflections do not yield stable mmWave reflections. However, we make an interesting observation that focusing on the forearm instead of the fingers can provide stable reflections for 3D finger motion tracking. Muscles that activate the fingers extend through the forearm, whose motion manifests as vibrations on the forearm. By analyzing the variation in phases of reflected mmWave signals from the forearm, this paper designs mm4Arm, a system that tracks 3D finger motion. Nontrivial challenges arise due to the high dimensional search space, complex vibration patterns, diversity across users, hardware noise, etc. mm4Arm exploits anatomical constraints in finger motions and fuses them with machine learning architectures based on encoder-decoder and ResNets in enabling accurate tracking. A systematic performance evaluation with 10 users demonstrates a median error of 5.73° (location error of 4.07 mm) with robustness to multipath and natural variation in hand position/orientation. The accuracy is also consistent under non-line-of-sight conditions and clothing that might occlude the forearm. mm4Arm runs on smartphones with a latency of 19 ms and low energy overhead. 
    more » « less
  6. We propose MiShape, a millimeter-wave (mmWave) wireless signal based imaging system that generates high-resolution human silhouettes and predicts 3D locations of body joints. The system can capture human motions in real-time under low light and low-visibility conditions. Unlike existing vision-based motion capture systems, MiShape is privacy non-invasive and can generalize to a wide range of motion tracking applications at-home. To overcome the challenges with low-resolution, specularity, and aliasing in images from Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) mmWave systems, MiShape designs deep learning models based on conditional Generative Adversarial Networks and incorporates the rules of human biomechanics. We have customized MiShape for gait monitoring, but the model is well adaptive to any tracking applications with limited fine-tuning samples. We experimentally evaluate MiShape with real data collected from a COTS mmWave system for 10 volunteers, with diverse ages, gender, height, and somatotype, performing different poses. Our experimental results demonstrate that MiShape delivers high-resolution silhouettes and accurate body poses on par with an existing vision-based system, and unlocks the potential of mmWave systems, such as 5G home wireless routers, for privacy-noninvasive healthcare applications. 
    more » « less