Search for: All records

The waste generated by the brewing industry, particularly brewer’s spent grain (BSG) and wastewater, presents challenges for sustainable management practices. While BSG is traditionally utilized as cattle feed, this option is not universally accessible. This study considered the environmental impact of a novel, laboratory-based process for converting BSG into biochar that also utilizes brewing wastewater, as compared to disposing of BSG and cleaning chemical wastewater. The study employed a carbon footprint assessment approach to quantify the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with each disposal method, using one unprocessed kg of BSG as the functional unit. The results indicated that landfilling BSG generated approximately 3 kg CO2 equivalent (CO2e) per kg of unprocessed BSG, whereas biochar production reduced emissions to 1.18 kg CO2e per kg of BSG. The study concluded that diverting BSG from landfills to biochar production presents a viable strategy for minimizing environmental impacts associated with BSG disposal. However, several factors must be considered in the development of a biochar production facility, including biochar transportation. These elements may contribute more GHG emissions than landfilling if not properly designed. 

Restoration of coastal dunes following tropical storm events often requires renourishment of sand substrate dredged from offshore sources, although dredging has well‐described negative ecological impacts and high economic costs. As a potential solution, recycled glass sand (cullet) made from crushed glass bottles has been proposed as a potential replacement for dredging. However, glass sand substrates may have limited ability to provide support to coastal plant communities due to the absence of native soil microbial communities. To explore the potential use of glass sand as a substrate for dune plants in the Northern Gulf of Mexico, we compared the growth of Sea oats (Uniola paniculata), Beach morning‐glory (Ipomoea imperati), and Railroad vine (I. pes‐caprae) in glass sand to growth in live beach sand. To determine if inoculation of glass sand with native soil microbial communities improved survival, growth, and biomass production, we also tested plant growth in glass sand with native microbial amendments. Overall, we found no difference in the survival of the three dune species across three soil treatments and weak differences in plant growth and biomass production across our soil substrates. Our results suggest that glass sand substrates may be a viable option for coastal dune restoration, with limited differences between live beach sand, glass sand, and glass sand inoculated with native soil microbes. Restoration and replenishment of coastal dunes using glass sand as a substrate following tropical storms or sea‐level rise may allow coastal managers to reduce the economic and ecological damage associated with offshore sediment dredging. 

Genetic screens in Drosophila melanogaster have long been used to identify genes found in a variety of developmental, cellular, and behavioral processes. Here we describe the characterization and mapping of a mutation identified in a conditional screen for genetic regulators of cell growth and cell division. Within a Flp/FRT system, mutant G.3.2 results in a reduction of mutant tissue and a rough eye phenotype. We find that G.3.2 maps to the gene cnk, providing further support that cnk is a critical gene in Drosophila eye development. This mutant was characterized, mapped and sequenced by undergraduate students within the Fly-CURE consortium.