Search for: All records

As climatic variation re‐shapes global biodiversity, understanding eco‐evolutionary feedbacks during species range shifts is of increasing importance. Theory on range expansions distinguishes between two different forms: “pulled” and “pushed” waves. Pulled waves occur when the source of the expansion comes from low‐density peripheral populations, while pushed waves occur when recruitment to the expanding edge is supplied by high‐density populations closer to the species' core. How extreme events shape pushed/pulled wave expansion events, as well as trailing‐edge declines/contractions, remains largely unexplored. We examined eco‐evolutionary responses of a marine invertebrate (the owl limpet,Lottia gigantea) that increased in abundance during the 2014–2016 marine heatwaves near the poleward edge of its geographic range in the northeastern Pacific. We used whole‐genome sequencing from 19 populations across >11 degrees of latitude to characterize genomic variation, gene flow, and demographic histories across the species' range. We estimated present‐day dispersal potential and past climatic stability to identify how contemporary and historical seascape features shape genomic characteristics. Consistent with expectations of a pushed wave, we found little genomic differentiation between core and leading‐edge populations, and higher genomic diversity at range edges. A large and well‐mixed population in the northern edge of the species' range is likely a result of ocean current anomalies increasing larval settlement and high‐dispersal potential across biogeographic boundaries. Trailing‐edge populations have higher differentiation from core populations, possibly driven by local selection and limited gene flow, as well as high genomic diversity likely as a result of climatic stability during the Last Glacial Maximum. Our findings suggest that extreme events can drive poleward range expansions that carry the adaptive potential of core populations, while also cautioning that trailing‐edge extirpations may threaten unique evolutionary variation. This work highlights the importance of understanding how both trailing and leading edges respond to global change and extreme events. 

ABSTRACT Coastal organisms live in a dynamic environment where a myriad of environmental stressors, including climate change, ocean acidification, and human harvesting, act on variable spatio‐temporal scales. Each of these stressors may impose unique selective forces on a population, shaping a species' adaptive potential and its ability to persist under future climatic conditions. Genomic investigations of adaptive responses to environmental and anthropogenic disturbances remain rare, especially in marine systems. Here, we use whole genome sequencing data from the owl limpet,Lottia gigantea, and outlier detection methods to pinpoint signals of selection (1) across long‐standing environmental gradients spanning the species' distribution, (2) at the poleward edge of the species' range where it experienced a recent expansion, and (3) between sites vulnerable to or protected from human size‐selective harvesting within California. Loci associated with environmental gradients across the entire range show the strongest differentiation at the southern end of the species' range, potentially driven by adaptation to sea surface temperature and pH. Additionalad‐hocoutlier analyses revealed a distinct set of loci potentially under selection in the expanded range, with different functional roles than the range‐wide outliers. Despite demographic models suggesting that protection from harvesting has a positive impact on the abundance of large individuals, we did not find strong signals of selection or changes in genetic diversity between sites differing in harvesting vulnerability. Our findings suggest that range‐wide environmental selective signals established over longer time scales are distinct from those imposed by climatic anomalies at finer spatio‐temporal scales. We found that climatic variation has a stronger selective imprint than human harvesting, and thus conservation interventions should consider prioritizing the maintenance of climate‐related adaptive potential. Understanding how climatic trends and anomalies interact with anthropogenic pressures will allow us to make more informed decisions to sustain the evolutionary capacity ofL. giganteaand other key coastal species.