Search for: All records

Abstract We study the simplicial coalgebra of chains on a simplicial set with respect to three notions of weak equivalence. To this end, we construct three model structures on the category of reduced simplicial sets for any commutative ring $$R$$. The weak equivalences are given by: (1) an $$R$$-linearized version of categorical equivalences, (2) maps inducing an isomorphism on fundamental groups and an $$R$$-homology equivalence between universal covers, and (3) $$R$$-homology equivalences. Analogously, for any field $${\mathbb{F}}$$, we construct three model structures on the category of connected simplicial cocommutative $${\mathbb{F}}$$-coalgebras. The weak equivalences in this context are (1′) maps inducing a quasi-isomorphism of dg algebras after applying the cobar functor, (2′) maps inducing a quasi-isomorphism of dg algebras after applying a localized version of the cobar functor, and (3′) quasi-isomorphisms. Building on a previous work of Goerss in the context of (3)–(3′), we prove that, when $${\mathbb{F}}$$ is algebraically closed, the simplicial $${\mathbb{F}}$$-coalgebra of chains defines a homotopically full and faithful left Quillen functor for each one of these pairs of model categories. More generally, when $${\mathbb{F}}$$ is a perfect field, we compare the three pairs of model categories in terms of suitable notions of homotopy fixed points with respect to the absolute Galois group of $${\mathbb{F}}$$. 

In multiplayer collaborative games, players need to coordinate their actions and synchronize their efforts effectively to succeed as a team; thus, individual differences can impact teamwork and gameplay. This article investigates the effects of cognitive styles on teams engaged in collaborative gaming activities. Fifty-four individuals took part in a mixed-methods user study; they were classified as field-dependent (FD) or independent (FI) based on a field-dependent–independent (FD-I) cognitive-style-elicitation instrument. Three groups of teams were formed, based on the cognitive style of each team member: FD-FD, FD-FI, and FI-FI. We examined collaborative gameplay in terms of team performance, cognitive load, communication, and player experience. The analysis revealed that FD-I cognitive style affected the performance and mental load of teams. We expect the findings to provide useful insights on understanding how cognitive styles influence collaborative gameplay. 

In multiplayer games, players need to coordinate action to succeed. This paper investigates the effect of cognitive styles on performance of dyads engaged in collaborative gaming activities. 24 individuals took part in a mixed methods user-study; they were classified as field dependent (FD) or independent (FI) based on a cognitive style elicitation instrument. Three groups of teams were formed, based on the cognitive style of each team member: FD-FD, FD-FI, FI-FI. We examined performance in terms of game completion time, cognitive load, and player experience. The analysis revealed that FD-FI cognitive style had an effect on the performance and the mental load. We expect the findings to provide useful insight for practitioners and researchers on improving team collaboration in different contexts, such as learning, eSports, and disaster response.