- Home
- Search Results
- Page 1 of 1
Search for: All records
-
Total Resources2
- Resource Type
-
0000000002000000
- More
- Availability
-
02
- Author / Contributor
- Filter by Author / Creator
-
-
Adams, C (2)
-
Almazán, H (2)
-
Aparicio, B (2)
-
Aranburu, A I (2)
-
Arazi, L (2)
-
Arnquist, I J (2)
-
Auria-Luna, F (2)
-
Ayet, S (2)
-
Azevedo, C_D R (2)
-
Bailey, K (2)
-
Ballester, F (2)
-
Bayo, A (2)
-
Benlloch-Rodríguez, J M (2)
-
Borges, F_I_G M (2)
-
Brodolin, A (2)
-
Byrnes, N (2)
-
Castillo, A (2)
-
Church, E (2)
-
Cid, L (2)
-
Conde, C_A N (2)
-
- Filter by Editor
-
-
& Spizer, S. M. (0)
-
& . Spizer, S. (0)
-
& Ahn, J. (0)
-
& Bateiha, S. (0)
-
& Bosch, N. (0)
-
& Brennan K. (0)
-
& Brennan, K. (0)
-
& Chen, B. (0)
-
& Chen, Bodong (0)
-
& Drown, S. (0)
-
& Ferretti, F. (0)
-
& Higgins, A. (0)
-
& J. Peters (0)
-
& Kali, Y. (0)
-
& Ruiz-Arias, P.M. (0)
-
& S. Spitzer (0)
-
& Sahin. I. (0)
-
& Spitzer, S. (0)
-
& Spitzer, S.M. (0)
-
(submitted - in Review for IEEE ICASSP-2024) (0)
-
-
Have feedback or suggestions for a way to improve these results?
!
Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Abstract We investigate the performance of , a 7.5 GPU-accelerated photon propagation tool compared with a single-threaded simulation. We compare the simulations using an improved model of the gaseous time projection chamber. Performance results suggest that improves simulation speeds by between$$58.47\pm {0.02}$$ and$$181.39\pm {0.28}$$ times relative to a CPU-only simulation and these results vary between different types of GPU and CPU. A detailed comparison shows that the number of detected photons, along with their times and wavelengths, are in good agreement between and .more » « lessFree, publicly-accessible full text available August 1, 2026
-
Martínez-Vara, M; Mistry, K; Pompa, F; Jones, B_J P; Martín-Albo, J; Sorel, M; Adams, C; Almazán, H; Álvarez, V; Aparicio, B; et al (, Journal of High Energy Physics)A<sc>bstract</sc> If neutrinoless double beta decay is discovered, the next natural step would be understanding the lepton number violating physics responsible for it. Several alternatives exist beyond the exchange of light neutrinos. Some of these mechanisms can be distinguished by measuring phase-space observables, namely the opening angle cosθamong the two decay electrons, and the electron energy spectra,T1andT2. In this work, we study the statistical accuracy and precision in measuring these kinematic observables in a future xenon gas detector with the added capability to precisely locate the decay vertex. For realistic detector conditions (a gas pressure of 10 bar and spatial resolution of 4 mm), we find that the average$$ \overline{\cos\ \theta } $$ and$$ \overline{T_1} $$ values can be reconstructed with a precision of 0.19 and 110 keV, respectively, assuming that only 10 neutrinoless double beta decay events are detected.more » « lessFree, publicly-accessible full text available July 15, 2026
An official website of the United States government
