Search for: All records

A financial network is a web of contracts between firms. Each firm wants the best possible contracts. However, a contract between two firms requires the cooperation of both firms. This contest between cooperation and competition is studied in “Incentive-Aware Models of Financial Networks” by Akhil Jalan, Deepayan Chakrabarti, and Purnamrita Sarkar. They show how contract negotiations lead to a stable network where no firm wants to change contract sizes. In this network, the size of any contract depends on the beliefs of all firms, not just the contract’s two parties. Minor news about one firm can affect these beliefs, causing drastic changes in the network. Moreover, under realistic settings, a regulator cannot trace the source of such changes. This research illustrates the importance of firms’ beliefs and their implications for network stability. The insights could inform regulatory strategies and financial risk management. 

We consider the problem of clustering data sets in the presence of arbitrary outliers. Traditional clustering algorithms such as k-means and spectral clustering are known to perform poorly for data sets contaminated with even a small number of outliers. In this paper, we develop a provably robust spectral clustering algorithm that applies a simple rounding scheme to denoise a Gaussian kernel matrix built from the data points and uses vanilla spectral clustering to recover the cluster labels of data points. We analyze the performance of our algorithm under the assumption that the “good” data points are generated from a mixture of sub-Gaussians (we term these “inliers”), whereas the outlier points can come from any arbitrary probability distribution. For this general class of models, we show that the misclassification error decays at an exponential rate in the signal-to-noise ratio, provided the number of outliers is a small fraction of the inlier points. Surprisingly, this derived error bound matches with the best-known bound for semidefinite programs (SDPs) under the same setting without outliers. We conduct extensive experiments on a variety of simulated and real-world data sets to demonstrate that our algorithm is less sensitive to outliers compared with other state-of-the-art algorithms proposed in the literature. Funding: G. A. Hanasusanto was supported by the National Science Foundation Grants NSF ECCS-1752125 and NSF CCF-2153606. P. Sarkar gratefully acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation Grants NSF DMS-1713082, NSF HDR-1934932 and NSF 2019844. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.2317 . 

In this article, we advance divide-and-conquer strategies for solving the community detection problem in networks. We propose two algorithms that perform clustering on several small subgraphs and finally patch the results into a single clustering. The main advantage of these algorithms is that they significantly bring down the computational cost of traditional algorithms, including spectral clustering, semidefinite programs, modularity-based methods, likelihood-based methods, etc., without losing accuracy, and even improving accuracy at times. These algorithms are also, by nature, parallelizable. Since most traditional algorithms are accurate, and the corresponding optimization problems are much simpler in small problems, our divide-and-conquer methods provide an omnibus recipe for scaling traditional algorithms up to large networks. We prove the consistency of these algorithms under various subgraph selection procedures and perform extensive simulations and real-data analysis to understand the advantages of the divide-and-conquer approach in various settings. 

Community detection, which focuses on clustering nodes or detecting communities in (mostly) a single network, is a problem of considerable practical interest and has received a great deal of attention in the research community. While being able to cluster within a network is important, there are emerging needs to be able to \emph{cluster multiple networks}. This is largely motivated by the routine collection of network data that are generated from potentially different populations. These networks may or may not have node correspondence. When node correspondence is present, we cluster networks by summarizing a network by its graphon estimate, whereas when node correspondence is not present, we propose a novel solution for clustering such networks by associating a computationally feasible feature vector to each network based on trace of powers of the adjacency matrix. We illustrate our methods using both simulated and real data sets, and theoretical justifications are provided in terms of consistency.