Search for: All records

Narrative planning is the process of generating sequences of actions that form coherent and goal-oriented narratives. Classical implementations of narrative planning rely on heuristic search techniques to offer structured story generation but face challenges with scalability due to large branching factors and deep search requirements. Large Language Models (LLMs), with their extensive training on diverse linguistic datasets, excel in understanding and generating coherent narratives. However, their planning ability lacks the precision and structure needed for effective narrative planning. This paper explores a hybrid approach that uses LLMs as heuristic guides within classical search frameworks for narrative planning. We compare various prompt designs to generate LLM heuristic predictions and evaluate their performance against h+, hmax, and relaxed plan heuristics. Additionally, we analyze the ability of relaxed plans to predict the next action correctly, comparing it to the LLMs’ ability to make the same prediction. Our findings indicate that LLMs rarely exceed the accuracy of classical planning heuristics. 

Narrative planning generates a sequence of actions which must achieve the author's goal for the story and must be composed only of actions that make sense for the characters who take them. A causally necessary action is one that would make the plan impossible to execute if it were left out. We hypothesize that action sequences which are solutions to narrative planning problems are more likely to feature causally necessary actions than those which are not solutions. In this paper, we show that prioritizing sequences with more causally necessary actions can lead to solutions faster in ten benchmark story planning problems.