Search for: All records

Abstract This computational study explores the copper (I) chloride catalyzed synthesis of (E)‐1‐(2,2‐dichloro‐1‐phenylvinyl)‐2‐phenyldiazene (2Cl‐VD) from readily available hydrazone derivative and carbon tetrachloride (CCl₄).2Cl‐VDhas been extensively utilized to synthesize variety of heterocyclic organic compounds in mild conditions. The present computational investigations primarily focus on understanding the role of copper (I) andN¹,N¹,N²,N²‐tetramethylethane‐1,2‐diamine (TMEDA) in this reaction, TMEDA often being considered a proton scavenger by experimentalists. Considering TMEDA as a ligand significantly alters the energy barrier. In fact, it is only 8.3 kcal/mol higher compared to the ligand‐free (LF) route for the removal of a chlorine atom to form the radical·CCl₃but the following steps are almost barrierless. This intermediate then participates in attacking the electrophilic carbon in the hydrazone. Crucially, the study reveals that the overall potential energy surface is thermodynamically favorable, and the theoretical turnover frequency (TOF) value is higher in the case of Cu(I)‐TMEDA complex catalyzed pathway. 

ABSTRACT Access to benzofuran‐2(3H)‐one derivatives from readily available substrates under mild conditions is crucial in the pharmaceutical and plastics industries. We identified (Z)‐3‐(2‐phenylhydrazineylidene)benzofuran‐2(3H)‐one (P) during the recrystallization of (E)‐2‐(2,2‐dichloro‐1‐(phenyldiazenyl)vinyl)phenol using a 96% ethanol solution. The mechanism of the unexpected substrate conversion leading toPis investigated using density functional calculations. The computations revealed that ethanol is required to initiate the reaction viaTS1E, which involves a concerted deprotonation of ethanol by the basic diaza group of the substrate and an ethoxy group attacking the electrophilic center (Cl₂C), with an energy barrier of 28.3 kcal/mol. The resulting intermediate (I1E) is calculated to be unstable and can yield a cyclic chloroacetal adduct with a lower energy barrier of 2.2 kcal/mol via the ring‐closure transition state (TS2E). In the absence of water, the next steps are impossible because water is required to cleave the ether bond, yieldingP. A small amount of water (4% of the recrystallization solvent) can promote further transformation ofI2Evia the transition statesTS3E(∆G^‡ = 11.1 kcal/mol) andTS4E(∆G^‡ = 10.5 kcal/mol). A comparison of the ethanol/water‐ and only water‐promoted free energy profiles shows that the presence of ethanol is crucial for lowering the energy barriers (by about 5 kcal/mol) for the initial two steps leading to the cyclic chloroacetal (I2E), whereas water is then required to initiate product formation.