Search for: All records

Due to their ability to provide more uniform story drifts with building height, strongback braced frames (SBFs) have been proposed as enhanced-performance structural systems. Conventional design approaches, however, tend to underestimate force demands in strongback elements compared to nonlinear response history analysis (NRHA). To address this gap, alternative methods such as modal pushover analysis (MPA) have been suggested to obtain less computationally intensive estimates of seismic demands. This study presents a statistical assessment of MPA as an estimate of NRHA force demands for an 8-story SBF subjected to 44 far-field ground motion records scaled at the risk-adjusted maximum considered earthquake (MCE𝑟 ) intensity level. Unlike prior studies that compare MPA results to the statistics of the NRHA response, this work treats each ground motion as a separate test to characterize how MPA accounts for record-specific spectral characteristics. Accuracy in estimates of the force demands (i.e., how close the MPA estimates are to the NRHA “truth”) is characterized using root mean square error. Additional comparisons are made across the MPA parameters, such as the number of modes employed, as well as the use of initial versus elongated periods. Results provide a comprehensive statistical assessment of MPA, illustrating that the approach can be sensitive to spectral assumptions and is better suited to aggregated estimates from NRHA. 

Even with strong-column-weak-beam design requirements, story mechanisms have been observed in Moment Resisting Frames (MRF), resulting in concentrated drift demands that can result in severe structural damage to drift-sensitive components. Frame-Spine systems can redistribute demands with building height, but near-elastic higher-mode effects tend to contribute to floor accelerations, affecting damage to acceleration-sensitive nonstructural components. To mitigate this tradeoff, Force-Limiting Connections (FLCs) have been proposed to reduce accelerations through yielding components between the Frame and Spine, thereby limiting the magnitude of the forces. This study examines the sizing and placement of FLCs in a four-story Frame-Spine system using stochastic simulations. The T-shape yielding element dimensions in the FLC were modeled as random variables at each floor, and Monte Carlo simulations were used to explore their effect on drifts and accelerations. Results show the dominant role of the first-story FLC on balancing drifts and accelerations, while upper-story devices offered limited benefit. Design recommendations are provided to constrain first-story yielding element dimensions within effective bounds that reduce peak accelerations relative to the baseline Frame-Spine configuration. 

Concentration of drifts due to story mechanisms can lead to severe structural damage and economic loss. Frame-Spine systems have been proposed to mitigate these effects by redistributing drift demands with building height; however, systems can also exhibit near-elastic higher-mode effects, resulting in forces and floor accelerations that remain largely unreduced by inelastic behavior, thereby adversely affecting acceleration-sensitive nonstructural components and occupants. To address near-elastic higher-mode effects, Force-Limiting Connections (FLCs) have been introduced limiting force transfer between the frame and the spine and reducing acceleration demands through controlled yielding components. This study presents observations from full-scale shake-table testing of a four-story Frame-Spine and a Frame-Spine-FLC specimen at E-Defense. Results highlight higher-mode effects under strong shaking, with emphasis on (1) story shear resisted by the spine, (2) force–deformation behavior of the spine-to-frame connections, and (3) vertical distribution of forces. These findings provide experimental evidence of higher-mode participation in Frame-Spine systems and support the development of improved design guidance and controlling mechanisms. 

According to a new design paradigm called Converging Design, high-level optimization objectives such as resilience and sustainability can be pursued through iterative simulation and feedback. Unlike traditional design processes that prioritize desirable seismic performance at various seismic hazard levels, the Converging Design methodology also considers the long-term ecological impact of construction and functional recovery. This methodology requires navigating competing priorities, which can be pursued through multi-objective optimization (MOO). However, computational costs and incorporating uncertainty in seismic analysis also demand that optimization frameworks use algorithms and analysis resolutions that are appropriate to the decisions being made as the design is refined. While such a framework could be applied to any material, mass timber systems are increasingly attractive as a potential sustainable solution for buildings. In this study, using a Python-based object-oriented program, an automated structural design procedure is developed to evaluate the seismic and sustainability performance of parametrically definable mass timber building configurations. Different geometric classes with Cross-Laminated Timber Rocking Walls are modeled using OpenSees and are automatically designed. Their behavior is then studied to provide insights into the relationship between structural variables and the optimization objectives. The results show a clear trade-off between Seismic Safety (the inverse of risk) and Global Warming Potential due to the construction of different design options, although the nature of this trade-off depends on the desired seismic behavior limit states. The developed software thus enables designers to efficiently explore a range of early design options for mass timber lateral systems and to achieve optimal solutions that balance seismic and sustainability performance. 

Mass timber products are gaining popularity in North America as an alternative to traditional construction materials as part of both the gravity and lateral force-resisting system. However, several knowledge gaps still exist in terms of their expected seismic performance and plausible hybridizations with other materials, e.g. steel energy dissipators. This research explores the potential use of wall spine systems consisting of mass ply panels (MPP) and steel buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) as energy dissipators. The proposed BRB-MPP spine assembly makes up the lateral force-resisting system of a three-story mass-timber building segment that will be tested under cyclic quasi-static loading at Oregon State University. The proposed design methodology follows displacement-based design principles to determine the minimum required stiffness to limit inelastic story drift ratios at the design earthquake level. The MPP spine and BRB-to-MPP connections were capacity designed to resist forces transferred by the BRBs at roof drift ratios beyond the risk-targeted Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCER). This design solution provides an interesting alternative for the design of modern mass timber buildings. The results obtained in the experimental campaign will be used to validate the design methodology and the behavior of the innovative structural system.